<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Discrimination and bias</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Discrimination+bias</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Discrimination' and 'bias' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 06:10:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 06:10:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Tacit racism and sexism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/108032/Tacit%2Dracism%2Dand%2Dsexism</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biasproject.org/&quot;&gt;The Implicit Bias &amp;amp; Philosophy International Research Project&lt;/a&gt; brings together philosophers, psychologists, and policy professionals to study unconscious biases against members of stigmatized groups.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biasproject.org/recommended-reading&quot;&gt;recommended reading page&lt;/a&gt; collects recent scholarly articles available for download.  (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/40931/Yes-you-are-biased&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.108032</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 06:10:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>beliefs</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>conscious</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>implicit</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>sexism</category>
		<category>stereotypes</category>
		<category>tacit</category>
		<category>unconscious</category>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The New Jim Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/101981/The%2DNew%2DJim%2DCrow</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laprogressive.com/law-and-the-justice-system/black-men-prison-system/&quot;&gt;&#8220;More African American men are in prison or jail, on probation or parole than were enslaved in 1850, before the Civil War began.&#8221;&lt;/a&gt; That&apos;s what &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Alexander&quot;&gt;Michelle Alexander&lt;/a&gt; told a standing room only house at the Pasadena Main Library this past Wednesday, the first of many jarring points she made in a riveting presentation.

Alexander, currently a law professor at Ohio State, had been brought in to discuss her year-old bestseller, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1595581030/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; More Black Men Now in Prison System than Were Enslaved.&quot; [...]

&#8220;What do we expect them to do?&#8221; she asked, who researched her ground-breaking book while serving as Director of the Racial Justice Project at the ACLU of Northern California. &#8220;Well, seventy percent return to prison within two years, that&#8217;s what they do.&#8221;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04022010/watch.html&quot;&gt;Alexander in a Bill Moyers interview with Bryan Stevenson.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYgxkt6-JNc&amp;feature&quot;&gt;Alexander at Washington Journal&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.101981</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:16:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>jimcrow</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>prisonsystem</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>slavery</category>
		<category>warondrugs</category>
		<dc:creator>TheGoodBlood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Too fat to pass.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86864/Too%2Dfat%2Dto%2Dpass</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/11/20/lincoln"&gt;25 students at Lincoln University may not graduate, because they failed -- to lose weight.&lt;/a&gt; The students are members of &quot;the first graduating class required to either have a BMI below 30 or to take &apos;Fitness for Life,&apos; a one semester class that mixes exercise, nutritional instruction and discussion of the risks of obesity&quot; in order to graduate from Lincoln. In a similar vein, you may remember last year&apos;s piece of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/05/national/main3790418.shtml&quot;&gt;stunt legislation&lt;/a&gt; that would have banned fat people from eating in Mississippi restaurants. The bill did not pass into law.

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://yaleruddcenter.org/what_we_do.aspx?id=10&quot;&gt;Yale University Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity&lt;/a&gt; conducts research on weight bias, and has found that bias against fat people is prevalent in &lt;a href=&quot;http://yaleruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/bias/WeightBiasStudy.pdf&quot;&gt;employment, health care settings, interpersonal relationships, media, and education.&lt;/a&gt; Other scholars have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/128&quot;&gt;recently suggested&lt;/a&gt; that the stigma attached to body size may contribute to diseases thought to be caused by obesity. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86864</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:37:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>fat</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>prejudice</category>
		<dc:creator>Ouisch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>persecution complex? prosecution complex?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58903/persecution%2Dcomplex%2Dprosecution%2Dcomplex</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.firstfreedom.gov/"&gt;The First Freedom Project&lt;/a&gt; --new from the Dept of Justice, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/2/22/104711/204&quot;&gt;announced at the Southern Baptist Convention&lt;/a&gt; along with a call for their help---specifically and only to protect the religious from discrimination against them. Many are not impressed: &lt;i&gt;The administration has often ignored the importance of the no establishment principle by supporting attempts of governments to endorse a religious message, using tax dollars to fund pervasively religious organizations, allowing religious discrimination in hiring for federally funded projects, ...&lt;/i&gt; Legal strategies and actions from groups like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/news/story.aspx?cid=4019&quot;&gt;Alliance Defense Fund&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclj.org/&quot;&gt;ACLJ&lt;/a&gt; are now official DOJ policy, it appears. &lt;i&gt;...In his statement, Gonzales mentioned several cases litigated by ADF and its allies ...&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58903</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:13:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>churchstate</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>faith</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Racial discrimination at ford?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8452/Racial%2Ddiscrimination%2Dat%2Dford</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vny.com/cf/News/upidetail.cfm?QID=195760"&gt;Racial discrimination at ford?&lt;/a&gt; White male managers accuse the Ford Motor Co. of reverse discrimination, claiming they are victims of racial, age and gender bias. 

After reading this article, I&apos;m really at a loss as to where the racism is. They are reviewing all management and ditching those in the worst 5%... 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;... older white managers who received &quot;Cs&quot; after long highly productive careers say they feel they are victims of discrimination.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Golly Pal. You know, the past counts for something but you have to keep producing or you&apos;re gonna get canned. What&apos;s the problem here? This isn&apos;t racism, it&apos;s meritocracy and I&apos;m all for it. If they were giving bonuses to the evaluations based on ethnic background or sex then I could see the gripe. But the article doesn&apos;t say they are so what exactly is wrong with cutting the fat? 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8452</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:18:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>caucasians</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>ethnicity</category>
		<category>Ford</category>
		<category>FordMotors</category>
		<category>jobplace</category>
		<category>meritocracy</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>racialdiscrimination</category>
		<category>racism</category>
		<category>reversediscrimination</category>
		<category>whites</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


