<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Dogs and law</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Dogs+law</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Dogs' and 'law' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:47:11 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:47:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>So This Dog Walks into a Bar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58345/So%2DThis%2DDog%2DWalks%2Dinto%2Da%2DBar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap_travel/20070124/ap_tr_ge/travel_brief_pub_pups"&gt;Washington State Legislature to Allow Dogs in Bars.&lt;/a&gt; And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestranger.com/blog/2007/01/your_dog_does_not_pay_taxes&quot;&gt;some people&lt;/a&gt; are just not happy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.horsesass.org/?p=2443&quot;&gt;about it&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schnetzler.com/110Dogs/&quot;&gt;Dogs&lt;/a&gt; in bars. What&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dogfriendly.com/server/newsletters/jul06.shtml&quot;&gt;the big deal&lt;/a&gt;? Is it a health issue? In more civilized places, like Paris, they have been doing it for years - plague free.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58345</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:47:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dinning</category>
		<category>dog-haters</category>
		<category>do-gooders</category>
		<category>dogs</category>
		<category>drinking</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>liberty</category>
		<category>nerf-worlders</category>
		<category>pets</category>
		<dc:creator>tkchrist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19153/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1029171612782"&gt;Over-aggressive trademark enforcers &quot;advised to chill&quot;.&lt;/a&gt; Tommy Hilfiger&apos;s trademark is not infringed by Timmy Holedigger perfume for dogs.  Perhaps this can be used as precedent in responding to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/19133&quot;&gt;silly cease and desist letters.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19153</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:36:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cologne</category>
		<category>designers</category>
		<category>dogs</category>
		<category>fragrance</category>
		<category>hilfiger</category>
		<category>holedigger</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>naturelabs</category>
		<category>parody</category>
		<category>perfume</category>
		<category>pets</category>
		<category>timmyholedigger</category>
		<category>tommyhilfiger</category>
		<category>trademarks</category>
		<dc:creator>kcmoryan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11960/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0110300230oct30.story?coll=chi-news-hed"&gt;Chicagoans ready to pass new dog control laws.&lt;/a&gt; Instead on enforcing current leash laws to curb dog attacks, Chicago is planning to raise fines up to $10,000.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11960</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 05:30:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>animals</category>
		<category>chicago</category>
		<category>dogs</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>leashlaws</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>pets</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11489/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/3rd/001846.html"&gt;BROWN v. MUHLENBERG TOWNSHIP&lt;/a&gt; A municipal law enforcement officer violates the Fourth Amendment when he intentionally and repeatedly shoots a pet without any provocation and with knowledge that it belonged to a family readily available to take
custody.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11489</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:46:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>dogs</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>pets</category>
		<category>police</category>
		<category>shooting</category>
		<dc:creator>espada</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6607/</link>
		<description> San Francisco couple has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/03/27/dog.mauling.arrests/index.html&quot;&gt;charged with murder and manslaughter&lt;/a&gt; from the January 26 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/5929&quot;&gt;fatal mauling&lt;/a&gt; of a neighbor by two dogs they were caring for.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6607</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2001 22:18:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>dogs</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>MarjorieKnoller</category>
		<category>mauling</category>
		<category>murder</category>
		<category>RobertNoel</category>
		<category>SanFrancisco</category>
		<category>SF</category>
		<dc:creator>crushed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5334/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk_politics/newsid_1123000/1123412.stm"&gt;UK Govt. votes to ban hunting in England and Wales.&lt;/a&gt; Browsing the web last night, several national polls were showing that more of the British Public were against a ban than in favour. Will the MPs who turned up to vote but not to debate (not very democratic?) live to regret their decision as the debate turns from animal welfare to civil rights?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5334</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:48:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>animalrights</category>
		<category>animals</category>
		<category>animalwelfare</category>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>dogs</category>
		<category>England</category>
		<category>foxhunt</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>hunting</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>Wales</category>
		<dc:creator>nico</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


