<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with DonaldRumsfeld</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/DonaldRumsfeld</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'DonaldRumsfeld' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:13:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:13:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Onward Christian Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81733/Onward%2DChristian%2DSoldiers</link>
		<description> &quot;In the days surrounding the invasion of Iraq, &lt;a href=&quot;http://men.style.com/gq/features/topsecret&quot;&gt;cover sheets&lt;/a&gt;...began adorning top-secret intelligence briefings produced by [former defense secretary] Donald Rumsfeld&apos;s Pentagon. The sheets juxtaposed war images with inspirational Bible quotes and were delivered by Rumsfeld himself to the White House, where they were read by the man who, after September 11, referred to America&apos;s war on terror as a &apos;crusade.&apos;&quot; &quot;...Rumsfeld has always answered his detractors by claiming that history will one day judge him kindly. But as he waits for that day, a new group of critics&#8212;his administration peers&#8212;are suddenly speaking out for the first time. &lt;a href=&quot;http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_9217&quot;&gt;What they&#8217;re saying? It isn&#8217;t pretty&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81733</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:13:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Crusade</category>
		<category>DefenseSecretary</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Say What?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71002/Say%2DWhat</link>
		<description> From Radio 4&apos;s Broadcasting House: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7350000/newsid_7357300/7357322.stm?bw=nb&amp;mp=wm&amp;news=1&amp;ms3=6&amp;ms_javascript=true&amp;bbcws=2&quot;&gt;The Donald Rumsfeld Soundbites of the Decade&lt;/a&gt;. A collection of statements we do now know we know.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71002</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:33:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>soundbites</category>
		<dc:creator>forallmankind</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>[Obligatory reference to song lyric with Sunshine in it.]</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59473/Obligatory%2Dreference%2Dto%2Dsong%2Dlyric%2Dwith%2DSunshine%2Din%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB142/index.htm"&gt;Same Old Dogs, Same Old Tricks.&lt;/a&gt; In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/14/AR2007031402300.html&quot; title=&quot;rare act of bipartisan cooperation, the House of Representatives passed a group of bills&quot;&gt;rare act of bipartisan cooperation, the House of Representatives passed a group of bills&lt;/a&gt; strengthening the FOIA (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1309/show&quot; title=&quot;HR 1309&quot;&gt;HR 1309&lt;/a&gt;), streamlining access to Presidential Libraries (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h1255/show&quot; blank_ title=&quot;HR 1255&quot;&gt;HR 1255&lt;/a&gt;), and expanding safeguards for whistleblowers (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h985/show&quot; blank_ title=&quot;still in process, HR 985&quot;&gt;still in process, HR 985&lt;/a&gt;), with those that were passed having a veto-proof margin. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gainesville.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070315/WIRE/703150343/-1/news&quot;&gt;White House sharply criticized these acts of transparency&lt;/a&gt; as unconstitutional, a threat on the established separation of Powers,  and as a threat to national security [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/legislative/sap/110-1/hr1309sap-h.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;].  All of which heralds back to an earlier time, that &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.salon.com/politics/feature/2002/06/17/bush_watergate/print.html&quot;&gt;looks&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newswar/preview/documents.html&quot;&gt;vaguely&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/325/v-print/story/124857.html&quot;&gt;familiar&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59473</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:17:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antonscalia</category>
		<category>dickcheney</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>geraldford</category>
		<category>leaks</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>sunshineweek</category>
		<dc:creator>rzklkng</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who do the troops support?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56065/Who%2Ddo%2Dthe%2Dtroops%2Dsupport</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/110406Z.shtml"&gt;US Military Papers open fire on Rummy.&lt;/a&gt; Tomorrow, the Army Times -- and all other Military Times papers, including Navy and Air Force Times -- will run an editorial calling for Donald Rumsfeld to tender his resignation or be fired, due to his gross incompetence in handling the Iraq quagmire.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56065</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:01:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>lazaruslong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How could they DO this to us?  We trusted them!!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38170/How%2Dcould%2Dthey%2DDO%2Dthis%2Dto%2Dus%2DWe%2Dtrusted%2Dthem</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42112"&gt;Let&apos;s Roll !!!&lt;/a&gt; Does Donald Rumsfield contradicting the official US record harm America?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38170</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:50:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<dc:creator>Balisong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Signature Stamping Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38040/Signature%2DStamping%2DMachine</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1377351,00.html"&gt;The automated signature machine would like to express it&apos;s sincerest condolences&lt;/a&gt; ...&quot;Rather than personally signing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoaklandpress.com/stories/122104/opi_20041221004.shtml&quot;&gt;letters of condolence&lt;/a&gt; to the families of service members killed in action, Rumsfeld has been letting office workers affix his signature with a stamping machine.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38040</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>autopen</category>
		<category>condolences</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>rumsfield</category>
		<dc:creator>thisisdrew</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Executive Order Along Torture&apos;s Path</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38012/An%2DExecutive%2DOrder%2DAlong%2DTortures%2DPath</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;I have been told that all interrogation techniques previously authorized by the Executive Order are still on the table but that certain techniques can only be used if very high-level authority is granted.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Request for guidance regarding the OGC&apos;s EC regarding detainee abuse, referring to &#8220;interrogation techniques made lawful&#8221; by the &#8220;President&apos;s Executive Order.&#8221;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes  from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/&quot;&gt;Records Released in Response to Torture FOIA Request&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/news/NewsPrint.cfm?ID=17216&amp;c=206&quot; title=&quot;The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and &apos;&apos;sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc.&apos;&apos; The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from &apos;&apos;On Scene Commander--Baghdad&apos;&apos; to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized. &quot;&gt;Smoking Gun ?&lt;/a&gt; asks the ACLU--or just another stepping stone from &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6733558/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot; title=&quot;In a Jan. 25, 2002, memo to Bush, Gonzales said the new war on terror &apos;&apos;renders obsolete Geneva&apos;s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners.&apos;&apos; Some State Department lawyers charge that Gonzales misrepresented so many legal considerations and facts (including hard conclusions by State&apos;s Southeast Asia bureau about the nature of the Taliban) that one lawyer considers the memo to be &apos;&apos;an ethical breach.&apos;&apos; In response, a senior White House official says Gonzales&apos;s memo was only a &apos;&apos;draft&apos;&apos; and just one part of an extensive decision-making process in which all views were aired.&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s Path&lt;/a&gt; ? As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/16/politics/16jag.html?ei=5090&amp;en=5016ee06544b6bc4&amp;ex=1260939600&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;Several former high-ranking military lawyers say they are discussing ways to oppose President Bush&apos;s nomination of Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general, asserting that Gonzales&apos;s supervision of legal memorandums that appeared to sanction harsh treatment of detainees, even torture, showed unsound legal judgment.&quot;&gt;Ex-Military Lawyers Object to Bush Cabinet Nominee&lt;/a&gt;, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/12/17/memo/print.html&quot; title=&quot;Renewed exposure of prisoner abuse, torture and even murder by American military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan is widening already deep divisions between the Pentagon and the intelligence community -- and creating an untenable situation for Donald Rumsfeld, the beleaguered secretary of defense. A recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &apos;&apos;marching orders&apos;&apos; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from the defense secretary himself. In recent days, a coalition of human rights groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights has brought new cases of abuse to public attention. Using the Freedom of Information Act, they have pried thousands of pages of previously secret documents from the Defense Department and other agencies.&quot;&gt;Torture begins at the top&lt;/a&gt;, Joe Conason suggests that a recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &quot;marching orders&quot; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from Defense Secretary Rumsfeld himself and all the while &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5083701-110481,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Fresh allegations about a regime of torture and humiliation inflicted on detainees by their American captors at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay have been made by a Briton still held there, according to Foreign Office documents seen by the Guardian. The claims by Martin Mubanga, from London, are the latest to surface from the prison where the US holds 550 Muslim men it claims are terrorists in conditions that have sparked worldwide condemnation. &quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo torture and humiliation still going on, says shackled Briton&lt;/a&gt;. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38012</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>AlbertoGonzales</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>ExecutiveOrder</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformationAct</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The price of greatness is responsibility.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37926/The%2Dprice%2Dof%2Dgreatness%2Dis%2Dresponsibility</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sikhnet.com/sikhnet/discussion.nsf/0/518154AC342D48B987256A8700645956!OpenDocument"&gt;&quot;There is no excuse for superior authority not choosing the most suitable agents for particular duties, and not removing unsuitable agents from particular duties.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; With all the talk of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanempireproject.com/&quot;&gt;empires&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ft.com/cms/s/e6271a32-4fc6-11d9-86b3-00000e2511c8.html&quot;&gt;resignations&lt;/a&gt;, a reflection to history turns up a remarkable story about an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.winstonchurchill.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=1&quot;&gt;already remarkable man&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

  A tense time in British India came to a head when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=9031666&quot;&gt;General Reginald Dyer&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s brigade opened fire on an unarmed crowd assembled in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pugmarks.com/gallery/golden/&quot;&gt;Amritsar &lt;/a&gt;with machine guns, killing 379 and wounding over 1500.  Command wanted to relieve him of duty, but patriotic (and imperialist) fervor at home led to a parliamentary debate which was expected to repudiate this decision and honor him.  Enter War Secretary Winston Churchill who defended the Government &lt;a href=&quot;http://lachlan.bluehaze.com.au/churchill/am-man.htm&quot;&gt;so eloquently that the minds and hearts of the entire deliberative body were turned.    &lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37926</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:12:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Amritsar</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>empire</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>India</category>
		<category>ReginaldDyer</category>
		<category>responsibility</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WinstonChurchill</category>
		<dc:creator>allan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who Would Jesus Kill?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36687/Who%2DWould%2DJesus%2DKill</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://conspiracy.hopto.org:6969/stats.html?info_hash=d12108a0126ab8b038d05c843b9bdd201af6e0ad"&gt;Jesus Built My M16 (474.9 MB Music Video torrent)&lt;/a&gt; &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.futurepatriots.com/&quot;&gt;The Future Patriots&lt;/a&gt; were established in 2002 by the Honorable Donald Rumsfeld as a method of training our nation&apos;s youth in the arts of propaganda, fear-mongering, race-baiting, dis-information, and electoral fraud.

We aim to assure that the control of this great nation will never be handed over to the liberal homosexual atheists who threaten our way of life by their very existence.

May these songs profit the Revolution!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36687</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:14:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>futurepatriots</category>
		<category>jesusbuiltmym16</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>rightwing</category>
		<dc:creator>quasistoic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld&apos;s War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36638/Rumsfelds%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/&quot;&gt;Frontline: Rumsfeld&apos;s War&lt;/a&gt;, a PBS/Washington Post joint documentary that aired earlier this week is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/view/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;. It is the inside story of Rumsfeld&apos;s battle to assert civil control over the military.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36638</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:12:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chainofcommand</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Frontline</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>PBS</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld doubts Saddam Laden link</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36029/Rumsfeld%2Ddoubts%2DSaddam%2DLaden%2Dlink</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3715396.stm"&gt;Rumsfeld doubts Saddam Laden link&lt;/a&gt; US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has cast doubt on whether there was ever a relationship between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36029</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:03:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alQaeda</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>SaddamHussein</category>
		<dc:creator>hoder</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Abu Ghraib: Same Service, Under New Management</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33146/Abu%2DGhraib%2DSame%2DService%2DUnder%2DNew%2DManagement</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?fact/040524fa_fact"&gt;Rumsfeld knew.&lt;/a&gt; More revelations from Seymour Hersch at &lt;i&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/i&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33146</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 09:26:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abughraib</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Drunken Temple Boxing! Lion Claw Technique!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33043/Drunken%2DTemple%2DBoxing%2DLion%2DClaw%2DTechnique</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.poe-news.com/forums/sp.php?si=31&amp;amp;fi=000031540&amp;amp;ti=1000648693&amp;amp;pi=1000648722"&gt;Drunken Temple Boxing!&lt;/a&gt; You may have defeated my Southern Hook Palm technique, but can you defeat the 1000 styles of Rumsfeld?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33043</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 09:01:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>joke</category>
		<category>martialarts</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<dc:creator>kirkaracha</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Pentagon Papers: The First Time as Tragedy, the Second Time As Farce</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32132/The%2DPentagon%2DPapers%2DThe%2DFirst%2DTime%2Das%2DTragedy%2Dthe%2DSecond%2DTime%2DAs%2DFarce</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&amp;amp;b=42125"&gt;Pentagon Flunky Misplaces 9/11 Talking Points at Starbucks&lt;/a&gt; A Pentagon employee left &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7BE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7D/01pp.pdf&quot;&gt;documents&lt;/a&gt; with talking points to help Donald Rumsfeld deal with questions about 9/11 on Sunday political chat shows.  The employee is almost certainly due to get fired, because the documents even included a hand-drawn map to Donald Rumsfeld&apos;s house!    (Note: documents in pdf file.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32132</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:29:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>starbucks</category>
		<dc:creator>jonp72</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Did I stutter?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31824/Did%2DI%2Dstutter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7bE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7d/RUMSFELDDENY4.WMV"&gt;Rumsfeld waffles on &lt;i&gt;Face the Nation&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; when asked about the &quot;immediate threat&quot; argument in favor of war with Iraq. Link is Windows Media video.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

This to me is a gregarious example of how semantics and linguistic framing has been used to manipulate the American public, and one clear moment of this questionable tactic breaking down.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Interesting how he tries to blame it on the media and &quot;folklore&quot;, and then segues right into noncommittal doublespeak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://joi.ito.com/&quot;&gt;Joi Ito&lt;/a&gt; (text available), via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanprogress.org/AccountTempFiles/cf/%7BE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7D/040315.HTM&quot;&gt;Center for American Progress.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31824</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>doublespeak</category>
		<category>ImmediateThreat</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>linguisticframing</category>
		<category>Rummy</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>loquacious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Finding art in the oddest places : genius</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31742/Finding%2Dart%2Din%2Dthe%2Doddest%2Dplaces%2Dgenius</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.stuffedpenguin.com/rumsfeld/lyrics.htm"&gt;The poetry of Donald Rumsfeld, set to music&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Unknown&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  

&quot;As we know, &lt;br&gt;
There are known knowns.&lt;br&gt; 
There are things we know we know.&lt;br&gt; 
We also know&lt;br&gt; 
There are known unknowns.&lt;br&gt; 
That is to say&lt;br&gt; 
We know there are some things&lt;br&gt; 
We do not know.&lt;br&gt; 
But there are also unknown unknowns,&lt;br&gt; 
The ones we don&apos;t know&lt;br&gt; 
We don&apos;t know.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt; 
[Department of Defense news briefing
Feb. 12, 2002] :  Now, imagine it set to music and sung aloud by a classically trained female singer with a beautiful voice.  [ Mp3 clips available at main link ] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iconservatives.org.uk/poetry_of_donald_rumsfeld.htm&quot;&gt;Some conservatives consider it a homage&lt;/a&gt;, while I find it beautiful, compelling, and disorienting.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31742</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>poetry</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld, you killed my brother. Now you must pay.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31435/Rumsfeld%2Dyou%2Dkilled%2Dmy%2Dbrother%2DNow%2Dyou%2Dmust%2Dpay</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.poe-news.com/features.php?feat=31845"&gt;Rumsfeld&apos;s fighting technique is unstoppable.&lt;/a&gt; [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airbag.ca/&quot;&gt;airbag&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31435</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>fighting</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>martialarts</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>techniques</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Saddam Hussein Sourcebook</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30383/Saddam%2DHussein%2DSourcebook</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB107/"&gt;Several newly declassified documents&lt;/a&gt; have been added to the National Security Archive&apos;s &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/special/iraq/index.htm&gt;Saddam Hussein Sourcebook&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, including a &lt;a href=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB107/iraq07.pdf&gt;State Department cable to special envoy Donald Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) for his second meeting with Saddam Hussein (months after the infamous &lt;a href=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/index.htm&gt;handshake meeting&lt;/a&gt;,) in which Rumsfeld conveyed the Reagan administration&apos;s undiminished support for Hussein despite their public condemnation of his use of chemical weapons.  (It also mentions but seems unconcerned with Hussein&apos;s support for Abu Nidhal.)  Another document describes &lt;a href=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB107/iraq11.pdf&gt;Bechtel&apos;s intention to do business with Iraq&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) through non-US sources in case of US sanctions.  [More analysis at &lt;a href=http://www.juancole.com/2003_12_01_juancole_archive.html#107190754281829381&gt;Juan Cole&lt;/a&gt;.]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30383</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:12:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>hussein</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>saddam</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<category>sourcebook</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Crikey</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29339/Crikey</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=263937"&gt;Has Rumsfield Lost His Mojo?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Time &lt;/em&gt;was first to break the&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/printout/0,8816,526352,00.html&quot;&gt; story&lt;/a&gt;, but now the world is listening.  Can it be?  Has Rumsfield truly, really, devastatingly lost his mojo?  And is he just &lt;a href=&quot;http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/world/story/0,4386,217640,00.html&quot;&gt;pretending to not know what it means&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29339</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:58:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>mojo</category>
		<category>time</category>
		<dc:creator>_sirmissalot_</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq Lacked Atom Whack</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29205/Iraq%2DLacked%2DAtom%2DWhack</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;At least four times in the fall of 2002, the president and his advisers invoked the specter of a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/07/bush.transcript/&quot; title=&quot;Bush: Don&apos;t wait for mushroom cloud&quot;&gt;mushroom cloud&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; and some of them, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, described &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer&quot; title=&quot;According to records made available to The Washington Post and interviews with arms investigators from the United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration&apos;s prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either.&quot;&gt;Iraq&apos;s nuclear ambitions as a threat to the American homeland&lt;/a&gt;... Among the closely held internal judgments of the Iraq Survey Group, overseen by David Kay as special representative of CIA Director George J. Tenet, are that Iraq&apos;s nuclear weapons scientists did no significant arms-related work after 1991, that facilities with suspicious new construction proved benign, and that equipment of potential use to a nuclear program remained under seal or in civilian industrial use. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;So in regards to Iraq&apos;s possession of &lt;em&gt;the one weapon we can be certain causes mass destruction: the atomic bomb&lt;/em&gt;, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.why-war.com/news/2002/10/07/weaponso.html&quot; title=&quot;Aum Shinrikyo employed skilled scientists and spent freely to make&apos;&apos;high grade&apos;&apos; anthrax, which it spread around Tokyo on several occasions. The cult gave up on anthrax after it failed to infect even a single person.&quot;&gt;Gregg&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newagepointofinfinity.com/homeland_security.htm&quot; title=&quot;The British and Germans used one ton of chemical weapons per fatality caused during World War I. The 1995 release of the nerve gas sarin in the Tokyo subways by the Aum Shinrikyo sect killed 12 people, fewer than a small, standard bomb might have killed in that crowded, enclosed area. An estimated 5,000 Kurds died in Saddam Hussein&apos;s chemical attack on Halabja, Iraq, in 1988, but this involved dozens of fighter-bombers making repeated low passes over the town. It&apos;s hard to imagine that terrorists could pull off such a coordinated heavy military maneuver. The image of millions cowering behind plastic sheets as clouds of biological weapons envelop a city owes more to science fiction than reality. The Japanese use of fleas infected with bubonic plague against Chinese cities in World War II was the only successful instance of bioattacks in contemporary warfare. In 1971, &apos;&apos;weaponized&apos;&apos; smallpox was accidentally released from a Soviet plant; three people died. In 1979, an explosion at another Soviet site released a large quantity of weapons-grade anthrax; 68 people died.In 1989, workers at an American government laboratory near Washington were accidentally exposed to Ebola, and it was several days before the mistake was discovered; no one died. A coordinated anthrax attack in the fall of 2001 killed five people, a tiny fraction of the number who died of influenza during the time the nation was terrified by the anthrax letters.&quot;&gt;Easterbrook&lt;/a&gt; put it, the verdict is the unsurprising (and unsurprisingly &lt;em&gt;closely held&lt;/em&gt;) nope, not, zero, zip, nada...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29205</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DavidKay</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Easterbrook</category>
		<category>GeorgeTenet</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>IraqSurveyGroup</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>mushrooms</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Tenet</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Let&apos;s fire Rumsfeld!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28381/Lets%2Dfire%2DRumsfeld</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.moveon.org/firerumsfeld/"&gt;Let&apos;s fire Rumsfeld!&lt;/a&gt; Moveon wants him fired and so does &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truemajority.com/index.asp?action=10067&quot;&gt;Truemajority.&lt;/a&gt;  Considering the White House has been looking for a fall guy for Iraq for some time now, can the constituents help Bush decide?  I guess we can debate the effectiveness of petitions but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moveon.org/images/dorganlott-big.jpg&quot;&gt;photos like these are just impressive.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28381</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 01:15:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>MoveOn</category>
		<category>MoveOn.org</category>
		<category>petition</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Truemajority</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld made his own intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27006/Rumsfeld%2Dmade%2Dhis%2Down%2Dintelligence</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/16/intelligence/index.html"&gt;Rumsfeld&apos;s personal spy ring&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;The defense secretary couldn&apos;t count on the CIA or the State Department to provide a pretext for war in Iraq. So he created a new agency that would tell him what he wanted to hear.&lt;/em&gt;  Today, &lt;strong&gt;Salon&lt;/strong&gt; also looks into the role played by &lt;a href=&quot;http://salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/16/bolton/index.html&quot;&gt;John Bolton&lt;/a&gt;.  Is investigative journalism now just relegated to the web? [you have to look at an ad, I believe]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27006</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:32:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cia</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>johnbolton</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>for Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26081/for%2DFreedom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&amp;amp;c=StoryFT&amp;amp;cid=1051390432932&amp;amp;p=1012571727088"&gt;Regime Change Bonanza.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/&quot;&gt;Donald&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janes.com/&quot;&gt;Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt; is pushing for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freemedia.at/bitter.htm&quot;&gt;Iran&lt;/a&gt; to be the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iranian.com/AhmadSadri/2002/December/Reform/&quot;&gt;next&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/shirz2.htm&quot;&gt;to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm&quot;&gt;fall&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26081</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 08:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>The Jesse Helms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>U.S. says Iraq may have junked toxic arms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26027/US%2Dsays%2DIraq%2Dmay%2Dhave%2Djunked%2Dtoxic%2Darms</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/cgi-bin/generic.cgi?template=articleprint.tmplh&amp;amp;ArticleId=97762"&gt;U.S. says Iraq may have junked toxic arms&lt;/a&gt; Thus spake Rummy in a speech. We know they have them. If we can not find them it is because they got rid of them. But that still means they had them at one time, right?
Question: what are those top scientists and Bath party members telling their captors wherever they are being held for questioning?  Or is too important to reveal too.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26027</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 09:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>weaponsofmassdestruction</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This just in -- now the mainstream media knows what everyone else does!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25605/This%2Djust%2Din%2Dnow%2Dthe%2Dmainstream%2Dmedia%2Dknows%2Dwhat%2Deveryone%2Delse%2Ddoes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/abs_news_body.asp?section=Opinion&amp;amp;oid=22357"&gt;Did Bush know?&lt;/a&gt; An article in today&apos;s New York Times (link to mirrored site with no reg. req.) pieces together data that the author claims proves that Bush and his inner circle were well-aware that they were using false &quot;evidence&quot; of Iraqi WMD.  Sy Hersh from the &lt;i&gt;New Yorker &lt;/i&gt;is also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030331fa_fact1&quot;&gt;chiming in&lt;/a&gt;, as is Salon&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2003/05/06/kristof/index.html&quot;&gt;Joe Connason&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030519&amp;s=pollitt&quot;&gt;Katha Pollitt &lt;/a&gt;of &lt;i&gt;The Nation&lt;/i&gt;.  A pretty decent subsection of media is finally descending on this story.  If Bush or Powell or Rumsfeld are proven to have been knowingly deceitful, will the American public be even half as angry as the rest of the world?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25605</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2003 12:11:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>colinpowell</category>
		<category>donaldrumsfeld</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>joeconnason</category>
		<category>kathapollitt</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


