<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Election2000 and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Election2000+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Election2000' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2001 00:51:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2001 00:51:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7821/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45242-2001May18.html"&gt;&lt;b&gt;The truth finally comes about trashing of the White House&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; as earlier reported &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/2001-01-27/News_and_Views/Beyond_the_City/a-97596.asp&quot;&gt;(remember the disinformation?).  &lt;/a&gt;The question now is, will the &lt;i&gt;mainstream&lt;/i&gt; press now cover this with the same fervor as the earlier (false) stories, or was it simply shoddy journalism in the first place to report and print &quot;facts&quot; without doing any background checks?  

Come to think of it, I never did see any photos of all the &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;alleged&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; damages created....

  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7821</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2001 00:51:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ClintonAdministration</category>
		<category>disinformation</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>liabel</category>
		<category>slander</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>Rastafari</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7390/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/cost.htm"&gt;the big book on the election!&lt;/a&gt; Unfortunately, though, Drudge highlited this--and we know his stance--and the Washington Times writer wrote it.  Well, the Times is owned by the Rev Moon organization, and as Consortium News reports, Moon has many money ties to the Bush family, including big money speaking tours by Daddy Bush. Go figure the objectivity of this one.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7390</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2001 07:51:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Drudge</category>
		<category>DrudgeReport</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Moon</category>
		<category>Moonies</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WashingtonTimes</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5721/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/bpihw/20010204/en/election_night_at_cnn_called_debacle_by_panel_1.html"&gt;Election Night at CNN called &apos;debacle&apos; by panel &lt;/a&gt; -- Well thank you, Captain Obvious!  For this they needed a &quot;panel&quot;?  To be fair, though, CNN did announce some changes to its election coverage policies ...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5721</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2001 04:57:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>uselections</category>
		<dc:creator>shauna</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5485/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/5444&quot;&gt;You thought it was just &quot;shenanigans,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; but it turns out to have been a lot more. Outgoing Clinton-Gore Administration staffers &lt;a href=&quot;http://drudgereport.com/wh93a.htm&quot;&gt;committed many acts of vandalism on their way out the door,&lt;/a&gt; including mass destruction of internal wiring, destroyed office equipment, intentionally-reprogrammed phone systems and trash strewn everywhere. It was so bad in the Vice-President&apos;s offices that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mullings.com/01-24-01.htm&quot;&gt;Tipper Gore had to personally call Lynne Cheney to apologize.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5485</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:36:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>shenanigans</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5212/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010111/ts/bush_leadall_dc_171.html"&gt;Apparently, Junior wants to be the &quot;edufication president&quot;... &lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;He said he wanted his administration to be remembered for making America ``a more literate country and a hopefuller country.&apos;&apos;&lt;/i&gt;. Sigh. How do you spell &quot;potatoes,&quot; again?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5212</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:05:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<dc:creator>m.polo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4870/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001217/ts/election_oconnor_dc_1.html"&gt;Justice O&apos;Connor said &apos;&apos;this is terrible,&apos;&apos; when it looked like Gore had won the election&lt;/a&gt; But of course, politics played no role in her decision to hand the election to Bush.  Right?  right?  ?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4870</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>SandraDayOConnor</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Outlawyr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4619/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/LAW/library/documents/election.florida/00836.dec04.pdf"&gt;ELECTION: Supremes remand decision to SCOFL.&lt;/a&gt; He may have balls, but his *luck* is running low.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4619</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2000 13:36:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>florida</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4472/</link>
		<description> The almost &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vny.com/cf/news/upidetail.cfm?QID=139088&quot;&gt;most rediculous item of the day&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;
Because, we will have a civil war over some 2 idiots that can&apos;t even lie to us right.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4472</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 05:18:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4286/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/11/14/corrected.reut/"&gt;After Microsoft and Napster, Boies tackles Bush.&lt;/a&gt; Did anyone catch this?  I noticed this morning on NBC that David Boies, who has represented IBM (versus the DOJ), the Yankees, the DOJ (versus Microsoft), and Napster, is now representing Al Gore.  Wacky stuff.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4286</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2000 13:30:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>DavidBoies</category>
		<category>DOJ</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>ElectionFraud</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>daveadams</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4281/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theonion.com/onion3641/clinton_president_for_life.html"&gt;Viva El Presidente!&lt;/a&gt; I wanted to install myself as El Presidente in a bloody coup.  Guess i&apos;m too late.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4281</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2000 11:02:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Clinton</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>satire</category>
		<category>TheOnion</category>
		<dc:creator>jbelshaw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4266/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/487297.asp"&gt;Presidential candidates may have to play a hand of poker&lt;/a&gt; to determine the winner of New Mexico.  I am not making this up.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4266</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:04:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>newmexico</category>
		<category>poker</category>
		<dc:creator>Succa</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4161/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/"&gt;CNN wants to know&lt;/a&gt; shoud voters in disputed parts of Florida be allowed to vote again. Right now the tide is against it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4161</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 17:10:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>florida</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<category>votecount</category>
		<dc:creator>DragonBoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4153/</link>
		<description> There ARE &lt;a href=http://election.dos.state.fl.us/cgi-bin/ElecRes.exe?mode=results&amp;elecdate=03/12/96&amp;type=PPP&amp;race=PRE&amp;party=REP&amp;district=16&amp;group=0&gt;2,856 people&lt;/a&gt; who WOULD and DID vote for Buchanan once before.  &lt;i&gt;(for people who are whining about there not being 3000 people in Palm Beach who would vote for Buchanan)&lt;/i&gt;
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4153</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 12:56:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Buchanon</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>PalmBeach</category>
		<category>PatBuchanon</category>
		<category>votes</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>jamescblack</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4141/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/elections/palmbeachballot.htm"&gt;Poor user interface elects George W.&lt;/a&gt; The second hole on the right does not correspond to the second candidate on the left (Gore), but rather to the first candidate on the right (Buchanan). While many people will notice this, many others, especially those with poor vision, will not. About 20% of Buchanan&apos;s votes in FL came from the county that used this ballot.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4141</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 06:48:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ballot</category>
		<category>ballotdesign</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>butterfly</category>
		<category>ButterflyBallots</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>IA</category>
		<category>SunSentinel</category>
		<category>UI</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>UX</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4140/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/20001109/A35699-2000Nov8.html"&gt;Missing him already?&lt;/a&gt; His fellow Americans will miss him - more, perhaps, than they realise. They&apos;ll miss the two terms of peace and record prosperity, of course, but they might even miss the psychodrama: an eight-year roller-coaster ride so turbulent that those who followed it become queasy at the recollection. They&apos;ll miss the daily triumphs and disasters of a character of Shakespearean complexity, a President who stirred in Americans passions of love and hatred unseen since the days of John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon - and almost never aroused by a single man. Above all, they will miss his signature feature, one that may well have redefined the presidency itself: an almost eerie gift for empathy.

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4140</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 01:43:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BillClinton</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>presidency</category>
		<category>TheAge</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>murray_kester</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4136/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://miva.dmregister.com/miva/cgi-bin/miva?news/live/display.mv+direction=showstory&amp;amp;showrec=5"&gt;Bush could ask for Iowa recount / Des Moines Register web site uses something other than ASP/WinNT&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Describes possible moves and legal requirements for a recount in Iowa. Did you know that there&apos;s nothing in the Constitution about voting for president? A new state could come up with some other method of choosing electors!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4136</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 20:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iowa</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4101/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://kenlayne.com/2000/2000_11_05_logarc.html#1301560"&gt;Statistical Dead Heat May Result in Ping Pong Match Tie-Breaker&lt;/a&gt; So says Ken Layne in his tale of obscure lore and presidential politics.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4101</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2000 21:17:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Statistics</category>
		<category>Tie</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>josholalia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4033/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/Assessment/00-11-03/Assessment.asp"&gt;The House: Encumbered by Incumbents&lt;/a&gt; While the big prize is still up for grabs, plenty of pols will stroll into another four years of fun in DC. With a 97% rate of incumbent re-election, in spite of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ficus2000.com/&quot;&gt;Michael Moore&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; best efforts, is it time to separate the presidential and congressional polls, so that there&apos;s a decent debate over the direction of the legislative branch?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4033</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:03:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>incumbents</category>
		<category>reelection</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3911/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/482025.asp"&gt;a GOP group is airing pro-Nader ads in critical battleground states in which he is threatening a gore victory.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;that is all.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3911</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:01:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>BattlegroundStates</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>commercial</category>
		<category>DirtyTricks</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>Green</category>
		<category>MSNBC</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<dc:creator>palegirl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3901/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vny.com/cf/News/upidetail.cfm?QID=131467"&gt;Chernomyrdin to sue George W. Bush&lt;/a&gt; to clear his name and business reputation. While we&apos;re on this, Monica Lewinsky, too, plans to sue Bill Clinton, because she too, wants &apos;to clear her name and business reputation.&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3901</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:14:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>chernomyrdin</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3892/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.speakout.com/votematch/default.asp"&gt;Are you really in favor of who you should be?&lt;/a&gt; Not having seen this in a quick scan, I&apos;ll point you to SpeakOut&apos;s VoteMatch quiz.  It correctly pegged me as a Browne voter, but I was surprised that Bush came in second, Gore fourth, and Nader 7th.  Hmmm...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3892</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:08:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>candidate</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>matching</category>
		<category>quiz</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<category>VoteMatch</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3871/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bushthumbs.com"&gt;thumbs up&lt;/a&gt;  for Bush!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3871</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2000 13:55:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>gluechunk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3846/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001024/pl/campaign_college_dc_3.html"&gt;Win the popular vote, lose the election?&lt;/a&gt; Talk about your constitutional crisis...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3846</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:23:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>electoralcollege</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>popularvote</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3747/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://politics.slate.msn.com/code/chatterbox/chatterbox.asp?Show=10/17/2000&amp;amp;idMessage=6299"&gt;Are Undecided Voters Stupid?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;BR&gt;
Undecided voters &quot;don&apos;t come across as terribly swift...&quot;
&lt;BR&gt;
&quot;If you&apos;re undecided at this point, you&apos;re an idiot.&quot;
&lt;BR&gt;
&quot;These soft voters do not have a coherent set of beliefs.&quot;
&lt;BR&gt;
More inside... 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3747</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:18:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<dc:creator>Tubes</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3731/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mediametrix.com/data/campaign2000.pdf"&gt;Media Metrix with some online election stats.&lt;/a&gt; Nothing particularly useful.  Although it does seem that the web may actually be right leaning?  Require Acrobat Reader  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3731</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:02:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>MediaMetrix</category>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


