<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Election2000 and election</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Election2000+election</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Election2000' and 'election' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 07:17:00 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 07:17:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6266/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/events/newsnight/newsid_1174000/1174115.stm"&gt;News about Florida from England&lt;/a&gt; Information from BBC that the US media never picked up.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6266</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 07:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>florida</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6216/</link>
		<description> &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motherjones.com/web_exclusives/special_reports/mojo_400/index.html&quot;&gt;Industry pumped in a record 696 million dollars&lt;/a&gt; to elect George W. Bush and a GOP Congress. The Mother Jones 400 reveals the nation&apos;s top contributors -- and what they expect in return.&apos;
&lt;p&gt;
The donors complain in this article about how much they have to shell out. Are their complaints legitimate? Is this simply the cost of doing business? Is this the way campaigns should be funded?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6216</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2001 07:25:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>american</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>campaigncontributions</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<dc:creator>Sean Meade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4228/</link>
		<description> It turns out before the election, representatives introduced a bi-partisan bill in both the House (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:H.J.RES.113:&quot;&gt;H.J. Res. 113&lt;/a&gt;) and the Senate (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:SJ00056:&quot;&gt;S.J. Res. 56&lt;/a&gt;) to amend the Constitution to replace the electoral college with the direct election of the President and Vice President. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shinybluegrasshopper.com/reform.html&quot;&gt;Contact your reps&lt;/a&gt; to ask them to support the bills. If we&apos;re going to get electoral reform, it will be now.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4228</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2000 18:45:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendment</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>ConstitutionalAmendment</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>ElectoralCollege</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>veruca</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4141/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/elections/palmbeachballot.htm"&gt;Poor user interface elects George W.&lt;/a&gt; The second hole on the right does not correspond to the second candidate on the left (Gore), but rather to the first candidate on the right (Buchanan). While many people will notice this, many others, especially those with poor vision, will not. About 20% of Buchanan&apos;s votes in FL came from the county that used this ballot.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4141</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 06:48:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ballot</category>
		<category>ballotdesign</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>butterfly</category>
		<category>ButterflyBallots</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>IA</category>
		<category>SunSentinel</category>
		<category>UI</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>UX</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4033/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/Assessment/00-11-03/Assessment.asp"&gt;The House: Encumbered by Incumbents&lt;/a&gt; While the big prize is still up for grabs, plenty of pols will stroll into another four years of fun in DC. With a 97% rate of incumbent re-election, in spite of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ficus2000.com/&quot;&gt;Michael Moore&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; best efforts, is it time to separate the presidential and congressional polls, so that there&apos;s a decent debate over the direction of the legislative branch?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4033</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:03:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>incumbents</category>
		<category>reelection</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3892/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.speakout.com/votematch/default.asp"&gt;Are you really in favor of who you should be?&lt;/a&gt; Not having seen this in a quick scan, I&apos;ll point you to SpeakOut&apos;s VoteMatch quiz.  It correctly pegged me as a Browne voter, but I was surprised that Bush came in second, Gore fourth, and Nader 7th.  Hmmm...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3892</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:08:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>candidate</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>matching</category>
		<category>quiz</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<category>VoteMatch</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3048/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42753-2000Aug29.html"&gt;Bush Evades Prime-Time Debates.&lt;/a&gt;   &quot;Gore spokesman Chris Lehane said Bush&apos;s &apos;idea of the perfect debate is on Austin cable access during the Olympic finals women&apos;s gymnastics.&apos;&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3048</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:52:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>debates</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>lbergstr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/357/</link>
		<description> MacOS Rumors is running &lt;a href=&apos;http://macosrumors.com/gates_PAC.html&apos;&gt;an internal Microsoft memo apparently written by Bill Gates himself&lt;/a&gt;. In it, he urges employees to give to the Microsoft Corp. Political Action Committee (MCPAC).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.357</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 1999 17:19:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billgates</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>politicalactioncomittees</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


