<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with FEC</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/FEC</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'FEC' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:12:02 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:12:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>What will Friends of Hillary do?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40144/What%2Dwill%2DFriends%2Dof%2DHillary%2Ddo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/The+coming+crackdown+on+blogging/2008-1028_3-5597079.html?part=rss&amp;amp;tag=5596640&amp;amp;subj=news"&gt;The Coming Crackdown on Political Blogging.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;In just a few months... bloggers and news organizations could risk the wrath of the federal government if they improperly link to a campaign&apos;s Web site. Even forwarding a political candidate&apos;s press release to a mailing list...could be punished by fines.&quot;  CNet&apos;s engrossing interview with an FEC commissioner who predicts major turmoil ahead as the government tries to decide if a blog link is a donation. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brookings.edu/dybdocroot/gs/cf/sourcebk01/InternetChap10.pdf&quot;&gt;Brookings paper&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) suggest &quot;Radical changes in modes of communication and forms of political campaigning lie not too distant on the horizon.&quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ironmouth.com/PermaLink.aspx?guid=4ff483b4-df61-4463-9952-e1be620e0b88&quot;&gt;This guy&lt;/a&gt; says it&apos;s all an attempt to undermine campaign finance laws by freaking out bloggers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40144</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:12:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>campaignfinance</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>FEC</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You will NOT criticize the Great Leader!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32107/You%2Dwill%2DNOT%2Dcriticize%2Dthe%2DGreat%2DLeader</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fec.gov/press/press2004/20040312rulemaking.html"&gt;The Republican National Committee&lt;/a&gt; is demanding that the Federal Election Commission issue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fec.gov/register.htm&quot;&gt;new rules&lt;/a&gt; that would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publiccampaign.org/pressroom/pressreleases/release2004/statement02-17-04.htm&quot;&gt;shut down groups&lt;/a&gt; that are in any way critical of President Bush or members of Congress.  Under the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commoncause.org/news/default.cfm?ArtID=282&quot;&gt;proposed rules&lt;/a&gt;, nonprofit organizations that advocate for cancer research, gun and abortion restrictions or rights, fiscal discipline, tax reform, poverty issues, immigration reform, the environment, or civil rights or liberties - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=14670&quot;&gt;all these organizations could be transformed&lt;/a&gt; into political committees if they criticize or commend members of Congress or the President based on their official actions or policy positions.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32107</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:14:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>fec</category>
		<category>rnc</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


