<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with FOX and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/FOX+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'FOX' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 03:45:11 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 03:45:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Get sexually harassed, get fired.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36304/Get%2Dsexually%2Dharassed%2Dget%2Dfired</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/242845p-208086c.html"&gt;Get sexually harassed, get fired.&lt;/a&gt; Fox News is pushing to fire Andrea Mackris.  The firing will not be &quot;in retaliation for her accusations about the show&apos;s host.&quot;  Now that&apos;s Fair and Balanced!  How is this even legal?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36304</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 03:45:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AndreaMackris</category>
		<category>BillOReilly</category>
		<category>BillO&apos;Reilly</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>employment</category>
		<category>falafel</category>
		<category>firing</category>
		<category>Fox</category>
		<category>FoxNews</category>
		<category>loofas</category>
		<category>NewYorkDailyNews</category>
		<category>NYDailyNews</category>
		<category>SexualHarassment</category>
		<category>TheFactor</category>
		<category>WrongfulTermination</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14298/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.startribune.com/stories/535/1134210.html"&gt;Fox News overtakes CNN in viewership&lt;/a&gt; even though fewer people get Fox News in their households.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14298</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:07:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cable</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>Fox</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>ratings</category>
		<category>viewership</category>
		<dc:creator>mrbula</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13210/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,321552-412,00.shtml"&gt;Geraldo caught lying&lt;/a&gt;  about his exploits in Afghanistan. &lt;i&gt;Rivera reported in a Dec. 6 piece that he &lt;/i&gt;(was)&lt;i&gt; standing on the &quot;hallowed ground&quot; in Afghanistan where &quot;friendly fire took so many of our, our men and the mujahedeen yesterday.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (later) &lt;i&gt;admitted that he was several hundred miles from the site.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

It seemed awfully strange how Geraldo was always where &quot;the action&quot; was in a country that large. What do you think Fox will do about this? Should he be fired?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13210</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:53:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>foxnews</category>
		<category>geraldo</category>
		<category>geraldorivera</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10727/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://fox.com/schedule/showinfo/specials/sp_0207.htm"&gt;Who wants to be a Princess?&lt;/a&gt; Remember &quot;Who wants to marry a Multimillionaire?&quot; Remember how it turned into a big scandal? Remember how Fox promised they wouldn&apos;t do it again? Well, they&apos;re doing it again this coming Monday.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10727</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:14:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>FOX</category>
		<category>realityTV</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8733/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20010701/en/tv_fox_balance_1.html"&gt;Fox News - neither fair nor balanced&lt;/a&gt; My problem with them is not that there&apos;s a &quot;conservative&quot; news network (the more the merrier), its that they pass themselves off as &quot;fair and balanced&quot; when they aren&apos;t.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8733</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2001 19:12:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>foxnews</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8460/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,27611,00.html"&gt;Toss a dog in traffic, go to jail.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;BR&gt;So, what do you suppose a fair punishment should be?  And, consider that dogs, while cute, aren&apos;t people.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8460</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:10:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AnimalAbuse</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CrueltyToAnimals</category>
		<category>dog</category>
		<category>Fox</category>
		<category>FOXNews</category>
		<category>pet</category>
		<dc:creator>dwivian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/640/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/e/AP-Fox-Simpsons.html"&gt;No!!! It&apos;s finally true, Maude Flanders is going to die&lt;/a&gt; in an upcoming simpsons episode. Now I wonder, will they make a big deal out of it and have her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=martyred&quot;&gt;martyred&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.640</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:42:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>flanders</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>groening</category>
		<category>martyrs</category>
		<category>maudeflanders</category>
		<category>simpsons</category>
		<category>thesimpsons</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


