<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with FTC</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/FTC</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'FTC' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:43:18 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:43:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Stop lying to the public about their fair use rights</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63448/Stop%2Dlying%2Dto%2Dthe%2Dpublic%2Dabout%2Dtheir%2Dfair%2Duse%2Drights</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070801-ftc-complaint-flags-nfl-mlb-studios-for-overstating-copyright-claims.html"&gt;Tech industry to FTC: stop studios from giving consumers scary, inaccurate copyright warnings.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63448</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:43:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>fairuse</category>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<category>mlb</category>
		<category>movie</category>
		<category>nfl</category>
		<category>studio</category>
		<dc:creator>grobstein</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rule #1: Don&apos;t Post About Yourself Anonymously on the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62862/Rule%2D1%2DDont%2DPost%2DAbout%2DYourself%2DAnonymously%2Don%2Dthe%2DInternet</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118418782959963745.html"&gt;&lt;i&gt;In January 2005&lt;/a&gt; , someone using the name &quot;Rahodeb&quot; went online to a Yahoo stock-market forum and posted this opinion: &quot;No company would want to buy Wild Oats Markets Inc., a natural-foods grocer, at its price then of about $8 a share.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  Who was that random fool?  Why, none other than John Mackey, co-founder and CEO of Whole Foods.  Whole Foods &lt;a href=&quot;http://lighterfootstep.com/whole-foods-wild-oats-merge.html&quot;&gt;purchased Wild Oats&lt;/a&gt; earlier this year for approximately $18.50 a share, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/markets/2007/06/05/wholefoods-wildoats-organics-markets-equities-cx_ra_0605markets24.html&quot;&gt;the FTC has an issue with Whole Foods buying out their competitor&lt;/a&gt;.  Mackey had responded to the FTC&apos;s complaint on his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/blogs/jm/&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;, but has not posted since some of his &lt;i&gt;other&lt;/i&gt; online comments became publicly attached to his name.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62862</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:01:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>wholefoods</category>
		<category>wildoats</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>ThePinkSuperhero</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Unpimp Your Credit Score, Say Yahhhh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50071/Unpimp%2DYour%2DCredit%2DScore%2DSay%2DYahhhh</link>
		<description> In the last few years, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/CreditScores.aspx&quot;&gt;Fair Isaacs&lt;/a&gt;, along with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/credit/index.html&quot;&gt;FTC&lt;/a&gt; have made &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/credit/ycr_free_reports.htm&quot;&gt;considerable&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/fcrasummary.pdf&quot;&gt;effort &lt;/a&gt;in educating us in how our credit scores are derived.  But is the whole system about to change?  In a somewhat quiet  &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060314/20060314005725.html?.v=1&quot;&gt;AP story&lt;/a&gt;, the three major credit bureaus, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.equifax.com&quot;&gt;Equifax&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.transunion.com&quot;&gt;Transunion&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.experian.com/&quot;&gt;Experian&lt;/a&gt;, announced they had agreed on a new common formula for generating your credit scores:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vantagescore.com/&quot;&gt;VantageScore&lt;/a&gt;. [more inside]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50071</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:57:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consumer</category>
		<category>credit</category>
		<category>creditreport</category>
		<category>creditscore</category>
		<category>equifax</category>
		<category>experian</category>
		<category>fico</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>transunion</category>
		<category>vantagescore</category>
		<dc:creator>poppo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FTC imposes $10M fine against ChoicePoint for data breach</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48599/FTC%2Dimposes%2D10M%2Dfine%2Dagainst%2DChoicePoint%2Dfor%2Ddata%2Dbreach</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,108069,00.html"&gt;FTC imposes $10M fine against ChoicePoint for data breach&lt;/a&gt; The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has fined ChoicePoint $10 million for a data breach that allowed identity thieves posing as legitimate businesses to steal social security numbers, credit reports, and other data from nearly 140,000 people. This is the largest fine ever levied by the FTC. ChoicePoint also has to set up a &apos;trust fund&apos; for people victimized by identity thieves. From the article: &apos;As part of its agreement with the FTC, ChoicePoint will also have to submit to comprehensive security audits every two years for the next 20 years.&apos;&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8FCE6T86.htm?campaign_id=apn_home_down&amp;chan=db&quot;&gt;BusinessWeek has additional info.&lt;/a&gt;

Perhaps there might be hope for individual privacy after all. Let&apos;s all keep our fingers crossed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48599</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:41:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>ChoicePoint</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>data</category>
		<category>FederalTradeCommision</category>
		<category>fine</category>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<category>identitytheft</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>mk1gti</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wouldn&apos;t it be nice...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36853/Wouldnt%2Dit%2Dbe%2Dnice</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wemarket4u.net/fatfoe"&gt;Lose &lt;strike&gt;Weight&lt;/strike&gt;Money Fast!&lt;/a&gt; If you click on this link, you&apos;ll go to an apparent sales site for &quot;FatFoe&lt;superscript&gt;TM&lt;/superscript&gt; Eggplant Extract&quot; another &apos;miracle&apos; weight loss aid. But click on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wemarket4u.net/fatfoe/order.htm&quot;&gt;Order Now!&lt;/a&gt; link and you get a lecture from the FTC on how to avoid getting scammed by diet products that are too good to be true, all part of the US Federal agency&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=healthNews&amp;storyID=6762564&amp;section=news&quot;&gt;campaign against diet fraud&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36853</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:10:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>diet</category>
		<category>fakewebsite</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34437/</link>
		<description> &lt;b&gt;&quot;The Federal Trade Commission and Congress must act to prevent Fox News from using the deceptive and misleading trademark &apos;Fair and Balanced.&apos;&quot;&lt;/b&gt; After yesterday&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commoncause.org/news/default.cfm?ArtID=355&quot;&gt;2,700 viewing parties&lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20040719&quot;&gt;Doonsbury&lt;/a&gt; plug, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outfoxed.org/&quot;&gt;Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch&apos;s War on Journalism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000579998&quot;&gt;the #1 selling DVD on Amazon&lt;/a&gt;. At the same time, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moveon.org/fox/&quot;&gt;MoveOn&lt;/a&gt; launches a campaign against the slogan, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/&quot;&gt;AlterNet&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/19265/&quot;&gt;challenges Fox&apos;s trademark&lt;/a&gt;. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/34275&quot;&gt;Previous discussion&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34437</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:53:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>foxnews</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>rupertmurdoch</category>
		<dc:creator>muckster</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Senate AntiSpam Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29118/Senate%2DAntiSpam%2DBill</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/7079710.htm"&gt;Senate approves  S.887 Can-Spam Bill.&lt;/a&gt; Spammers unhappy.FTC to report to Congress with a plan for creating a Do-Not-E-mail registry.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29118</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 04:05:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<dc:creator>elpapacito</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&apos;Do not call&apos; list on hold</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28535/Do%2Dnot%2Dcall%2Dlist%2Don%2Dhold</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2003/09/24/technology/ftc_donotcall/index.htm?cnn=yes"&gt;U.S. court rules FTC overstepped its authority when it set up the list to block telemarketing calls.&lt;/a&gt; Damn.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28535</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:45:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>telemarketers</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<dc:creator>MidasMulligan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Shameless</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27370/Shameless</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/apbiz_story.asp?category=1310&amp;amp;slug=FTC%20Three%20Tenors"&gt;Music labels charged with price-fixing ... again&lt;/a&gt; While their organization is fighting hard to picture potential consumers as de-facto delinquents, the FTC has issued a rulign prohibitng them from &lt;b&gt;agreeing with competitors to fix the prices or restrict the advertising of products they produced independently&lt;/b&gt; .

The labels deny any wrongdoing, as they did with earlier FTC charges of a much larger price-fixing scandal that &lt;b&gt;cost consumers an estimated $480 million&lt;/b&gt; (and was settled by paying 41 suing states $67.4 million in cash and offering $75.7 million in CDs.).

Here is an idea: the main culprits of the labels losses, by far, are the rapidly receding sales of ... 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/32048.html&quot;&gt;cassette, LP and vinyl products&lt;/a&gt;. Who&apos;d have thought of that?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27370</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:32:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<category>MusicLabels</category>
		<category>PriceFixing</category>
		<category>RecordLabels</category>
		<dc:creator>magullo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FTC&apos;s National</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24233/FTCs%2DNational</link>
		<description> The Federal Trade Commission&apos;s National &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/donotcall/index.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Do Not Call&quot; Registry&lt;/a&gt;, intended to stop unwanted telemarketing calls, &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;cid=544&amp;u=/ap/20030311/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_do_not_call_2&amp;printer=1&quot;&gt;became law yesterday&lt;/a&gt;. Do telemarketers have a First Amendment right to call you? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-dma.org/&quot;&gt;The Direct Marketing Association&lt;/a&gt;, and industry lobby, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-dma.org/cgi/disppressrelease?article=389&quot;&gt;thinks so&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24233</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:26:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donotcall</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<dc:creator>Steve_at_Linnwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Telemarketers beware ...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22407/Telemarketers%2Dbeware</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/849058.asp?vts=121820020930"&gt;FTC creates national &#8216;do not call&#8217; list&lt;/a&gt; While there have been state lists for quite some time, and some organizations (like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dmaconsumers.org/cgi/offtelephonedave&quot;&gt;DMA&lt;/a&gt;) maintain do-not-call lists requiring members to honor DNC requests, the FCC is now talking about a single, federal list that would require compliance from all telemarketers, and levy fines for non-compliance. Is this the end of telemarketing as we know it today?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22407</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:56:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>donotcalllist</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>regulation</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<dc:creator>MidasMulligan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14911/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/2002/02/15/national0526EST0480.DTL&amp;amp;nl=fix"&gt;Finally, no more Miss Cleo commercials&lt;/a&gt; as the Federal Trade Commission steps into to prosecute late-night TV&apos;s most popular psychic peddler. At first I thought if you dumb enough to call a psychic line, the gov&apos;t shouldn&apos;t be stepping in to block the charges, as the article notes the average call was $60, but they also note misleading &quot;free reading&quot; claims and crooked billing procedures. If you&apos;re making that kind of money, why resort to underhanded business practices? Even more obvious: why didn&apos;t she see this coming and change their ways?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14911</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:41:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>900number</category>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<category>psychic</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14102/</link>
		<description> The Federal Trade Commission is seeking to curtail the activities of telemarketers through the creation of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15842-2002Jan21.html&quot;&gt;national &apos;do-not-call&apos; registry&lt;/a&gt;. But the telemarketing industry says the FTC&apos;s plan would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21678-2002Jan22.html&quot;&gt;violate their First Amendment rights&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14102</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:26:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>donotcall</category>
		<category>federaltradecommission</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>telemarketing</category>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10974/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/170531.html"&gt;Take that Meatfilter.com...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;On Monday, Oct. 1, the FTC plans to announce the beginning of a campaign against scores of Web sites that capitalize on typo variants of popular domain names in order to dupe unsuspecting Internet surfers.&lt;/i&gt; 
I think this is a good thing, but how far can the US government truly influence shady internet practices? Should it even try?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10974</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2001 11:27:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>typos</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<dc:creator>thewittyname</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5454/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/23/technology/23DOUB.html"&gt;FTC ends investigation of DoubleClick&lt;/a&gt; and finds no evidence of wrongdoing. I don&apos;t know about you, but I feel cheated. Don&apos;t forget to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/576&quot;&gt;opt out&lt;/a&gt; of their cookie-bending racket.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5454</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:22:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>doubleclick</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4818/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO55191,00.html"&gt;FTC unanimously approves AOL/Time Warner merger.&lt;/a&gt; With a couple of restraint-avoidance conditions.  Wonder who&apos;s gonna &lt;i&gt;enforce&lt;/i&gt; those...  Aw, crap.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4818</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:43:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ftc</category>
		<category>mergers</category>
		<category>timewarner</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1629/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/000510/jm.html"&gt;Although this story doesn&apos;t sound like much,&lt;/a&gt; the FTC coming down on Time Warner, the effects could be great. Time Warner has agreed to ban their minimum pricing on featured new CDs, admitting that for the last seven years, these compact discs have been artificially overpriced. Do you think making CDs cheaper for the first time in years had anything to do with all the attention mp3s have been getting from consumers?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1629</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2000 11:50:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CD</category>
		<category>CDs</category>
		<category>FTC</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>pricefixing</category>
		<category>TimeWarner</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


