<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with FreeAsInBeer</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/FreeAsInBeer</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'FreeAsInBeer' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 11:43:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 11:43:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16838/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gnu.org.pe/resmseng.html"&gt;Peru goes GNU.&lt;/a&gt; And I quote: &lt;i&gt; &quot;You may have heard about this if you watch the free software news, but I just want to repeat it for anyone who hasn&apos;t.  The Peruvian government has introduced legislation requiring government offices to use free software; Microsoft is unhappy; and a member of the Peruvian Congress has written a response which I highly recommend reading, in which he explains in strong terms why it&apos;s out of the question for the government of a democratic nation to use proprietary software.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16838</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 11:43:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>FreeAsInBeer</category>
		<category>FreeAsInSpeech</category>
		<category>FreeSoftware</category>
		<category>GNU</category>
		<category>GPL</category>
		<category>Legislation</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>OpenSource</category>
		<category>Peru</category>
		<dc:creator>BGM</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


