<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with GWB and government</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/GWB+government</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'GWB' and 'government' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:16:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:16:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>It&apos;s leaking all over my democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28997/Its%2Dleaking%2Dall%2Dover%2Dmy%2Ddemocracy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/nation/7023679.htm"&gt;Bush orders officials to stop the leaks.&lt;/a&gt; News of Bush&apos;s order leaked almost immediately.  And speaking of leaks, two U.S. officials are the primary sources of information about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/10/12/MN304430.DTL&quot;&gt;Israel&apos;s Harpoon cruise &lt;/a&gt;missiles &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/348730.html&quot;&gt;which may or may not be used to attack Iran&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28997</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:16:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>leaks</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Department of Justice... Ha!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28691/Department%2Dof%2DJustice%2DHa</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=68&amp;amp;ncid=68&amp;amp;e=2&amp;amp;u=/nyt/20031002/ts_nyt/attorneygeneraliscloselylinkedtoinquiryfigures"&gt;Attorney General Is Closely Linked to Inquiry Figures&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Karl Rove, President Bush (news - web sites)&apos;s top political adviser, whose possible role in the case has raised questions, was a paid consultant to three of Mr. Ashcroft&apos;s campaigns in Missouri, twice for governor and for United States senator, in the 1980&apos;s and 1990&apos;s, an associate of Mr. Rove said on Wednesday.   Jack Oliver, the deputy finance chairman of Mr. Bush&apos;s 2004 re-election campaign, was the director of Mr. Ashcroft&apos;s 1994 Senate campaign, and later worked as Mr. Ashcroft&apos;s deputy chief of staff.&lt;/em&gt;  No wonder &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29560-2003Oct1.html&quot;&gt;69% of Americans&lt;/a&gt; think that an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/000601.html&quot;&gt;independent counsel&lt;/a&gt; should conduct the investigation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28691</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:48:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ashcroft</category>
		<category>AttorneyGeneral</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>DepartmentOfJustice</category>
		<category>DOJ</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>investigation</category>
		<category>JohnAshcroft</category>
		<category>KarlRove</category>
		<category>nepotism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Rove</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>who is this richard perle guy anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24180/who%2Dis%2Dthis%2Drichard%2Dperle%2Dguy%2Danyway</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030317fa_fact"&gt;who is this richard perle guy anyway?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
is anyone else a little concerned with some of his views and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&amp;c=3&amp;s=vest&quot;&gt;associations&lt;/a&gt; being one of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/organizations/foreignpolicy/defense_policy_board.htm&quot;&gt;top advisors&lt;/a&gt; to our current administration?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24180</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:55:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advisor</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>NewYorker</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RichardPerle</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Evil Empire?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23687/The%2DEvil%2DEmpire</link>
		<description> Ronald Reagan used many of the same good vs evil themes we are hearing from the current Administration. However, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/43104.html&quot;&gt;a comparison of his famous Evil Empire Speech with the recent words and actions of the U.S.&lt;/a&gt; makes you wonder if we are becoming what we once fought against.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23687</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:38:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>evilempire</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>ronaldreagan</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19465/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61040-2002Aug25.html"&gt;Administration Says It Can Attack Iraq without Congressional Approval&lt;/a&gt; Not a new story, per se, but this Post article lays out pretty well the arguments behind the administration&apos;s case, one being simply Bush&apos;s role as commander-in-chief. It&apos;s strange how closely this issue reflects earlier attempts by the administration to avoid Congressional and/or public scrutiny (Cheney&apos;s Enron meetings, for example). Why this aversion, and why fight so hard? And I have a sneaking fear that Bush will seek Congressional approval only after invading, and he will bully votes by claiming that reps have a patriotic duty to support a president in a time of war.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19465</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:16:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>risenc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16212/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020409/ap_on_bi_ge/taxes_who_pays_4&amp;amp;printer=1"&gt;I&apos;m curious,&lt;/a&gt; isn&apos;t this exactly opposite of what we&apos;re being told?  I&apos;m always hearing the wealthy are benefitting somehow from GWB&apos;s new tax plan.  I&apos;m certainly no-where near the top 5%, and now I don&apos;t want to be.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16212</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 10:01:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>the_0ne</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14226/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washdc/2002/01/27/bush-welfare.htm"&gt;Bush wants $100M to urge welfare moms to marry&lt;/a&gt; What will he want next $100M to urge Atheists to become Christians.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14226</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:35:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>mothers</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>single</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USAToday</category>
		<category>welfare</category>
		<dc:creator>onegoodmove</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14114/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/THE_TALK_OF_THE_TOWN/CONTENT/?020128ta_talk_lemann&quot;&gt;The most sensible take I&apos;ve seen&lt;/a&gt; on Enron and Bush. &lt;i&gt;Once all the fuss has died down&#8212;Congress is currently planning ten separate inquiries&#8212;two good things will probably have come out of the Enron mess. Companies will no longer be allowed to use their pension programs to treat their employees as an especially loyal and malleable class of shareholder; instead, pension funds will have to be diversified. And accounting firms will no longer be allowed to act as paid consultants to the companies they audit, as Arthur Andersen did with Enron.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;New Yorker&lt;/b&gt; link, no registration required.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14114</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:07:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>Enron</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NewYorker</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13189/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52146-2001Dec16.html?referer=email"&gt;He does return favors,&lt;/a&gt; but how does it affect the workers? Eugene Scalia is President Bush&apos;s nominee for Labor Department solicitor. Scalia is one of nine children of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who was a driving force behind the court ruling that stopped the counting of disputed presidential votes in Florida last year.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13189</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2001 08:42:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>scalia</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8917/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37723-2001Jul9.html"&gt;Bush&lt;/a&gt; is at it again. &lt;br&gt;
Is the fact that he is able to get away with things like this an indication of a backlash against the more &lt;i&gt;open&lt;/i&gt; years of Democrats in the White House?&lt;br&gt;
Is this secretly what the American public wants?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8917</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:38:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Army</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<category>deal</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>Salvation</category>
		<category>SalvationArmy</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>TiggleTaggleTiger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7048/</link>
		<description> Affirmative action seems to be taking root in an unlikely place: the Bush White House. &quot;There&apos;s been talk inside and outside the administration about having no more than half the 484 political positions in the cabinet and agencies go to white males and at least 30 percent to women,&quot; Fred Barnes writes in the conservative &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklystandard.com/magazine/mag_6_30_01/barnes_art_6_30_01.asp&quot;&gt;Weekly Standard&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7048</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:17:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AffirmativeAction</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WeeklyStandard</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5798/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0106/ridgeway4.shtml"&gt;Revealing look&lt;/a&gt; at Bush&apos;s policy and cabinet.   Scary.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5798</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:30:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>cabinet</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>VillageVoice</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5559/</link>
		<description> Christian States of America according to President Dubya. Government &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/bush_abortionrights010122.html&quot;&gt;should
                    not fund international family-planning groups&lt;/A&gt;, but &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/bush_faith010128.html&quot;&gt;should
                    fund faith-based programs&lt;/A&gt;. Someone please pinch me so I can
                    wake up and discover this is just a bad dream.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5559</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:21:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5366/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/jan01/privacy19011801.asp"&gt;It&apos;s uncertain how important online privacy is to &lt;/a&gt; President-elect George W. Bush. He indicated a general support for online privacy laws during the presidential campaign without indicating whether he leaned more toward industry self-regulation, technological solutions, legislative solutions, or some combination. A working document drafted by the Bush transition team on &quot;technology proposals&quot; echoes the same undefined support for online privacy. One analyst thinks his transition-appointments indicate a reference for industry self-regulation. 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5366</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:27:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<dc:creator>jhiggy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5068/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://msnbc.com/news/509305.asp"&gt;The Age of Embarrassment&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Bush&#8217;s cabinet choices are an assortment of right-wing ideologues, fat cats, has-beens, wannabees, and plain ol&#8217; opportunists. There&#8217;s not a visionary in the bunch.&quot; Truth? Or &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.com/news/511186.asp&quot;&gt;liberal hysteria&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5068</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2001 16:22:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>cabinet</category>
		<category>condoleezarice</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


