<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with GayMarriage and civilrights</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/GayMarriage+civilrights</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'GayMarriage' and 'civilrights' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:30:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:30:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Will the Mormon Church decide who gets married in California?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75903/Will%2Dthe%2DMormon%2DChurch%2Ddecide%2Dwho%2Dgets%2Dmarried%2Din%2DCalifornia</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hcn.org/issues/40.19/prophets-and-politics"&gt;Prophets and politics.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The Mormon Church &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/10/the-mormon-fact.html&quot;&gt;works to ban&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/22/MNJA13MEUP.DTL&quot;&gt;gay marriage in California&lt;/a&gt;, even as gay people in places like Rexburg, Idaho, &lt;a href=&quot;http://mormonsformarriage.com/&quot;&gt;come out of the LDS closet&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75903</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilRights</category>
		<category>CultureWars</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>GayRights</category>
		<category>Homophobia</category>
		<category>Homosexuality</category>
		<category>Marriage</category>
		<category>Mormonism</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Proposition8</category>
		<category>Religion</category>
		<category>SameSexMarriage</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Radical shift?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35176/Radical%2Dshift</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/25/politics/campaign/25cheney.html?hp"&gt;Are the Republicans starting to hedge their bets?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;WASHINGTON, Aug. 24 -In a break with months of Republican efforts to outlaw gay marriage, Vice President Dick Cheney offered a defense of the rights of gay Americans on Tuesday, declaring that &quot;freedom means freedom for everyone&quot; to enter &quot;into any kind of relationship they want to.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35176</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:25:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>gaymarriage</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<dc:creator>lilboo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Post hoc, ergo propter hoc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29891/Post%2Dhoc%2Dergo%2Dpropter%2Dhoc</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=22&amp;amp;art_id=qw1070024761604B225&amp;amp;set_id=1"&gt;Welcome to the Relativist Fallacy.&lt;/a&gt; Conservative blacks in the United States are objecting to recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/US/9605/21/gay.reax/&quot;&gt;comparisons&lt;/a&gt; between the gay marriage and the 1960s civil rights movement, which fought segregation against blacks, arguing that&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lafalce.com/library/family/2002-09-09_pr_miami.shtml&quot;&gt; sexual orientation is a choice&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29891</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:48:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>africanamerican</category>
		<category>black</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>equalrights</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>homosexual</category>
		<dc:creator>the fire you left me</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18503/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/daily/17/gay_marriage_ban.htm"&gt;Massachusetts Legislature kills proposed amendment to ban gay marriage. &lt;/a&gt; Is this a breach of grass roots justice? or the majority&apos;s right to strip rights from a minority should not be put to a popular or legislative vote?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18503</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:53:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>Massachusetts</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USLaw</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>LinemanBear</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2659/</link>
		<description> The new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.takebackvermont.com/&quot;&gt;weblog/site: take back vermont&lt;/a&gt; covers the the recent gay marriage ruling in Vermont and the flap it has caused for some of the more kooky right wing citizens. Many citizens have go so far as to openly display their bigotry by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.takebackvermont.com/manifesto.html&quot;&gt;posting signs in their yards&lt;/a&gt;. The best part about the site? Putting it at the domain of the people that oppose gay marriage, and asking people to deface the signs by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.takebackvermont.com/slogan.html&quot;&gt;adding a &quot;.COM&quot; to them&lt;/a&gt; so they can see a site that asks folks to support the law and all the reasons why it should stand. Simply ingenious.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2659</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2000 13:46:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>gaymarriage</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>TakeBackVermont</category>
		<category>Vermont</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1448/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/2000/bills/house/H-847.HTM"&gt;The same-sex domestic partnerships bill&lt;/a&gt; in Vermont has &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20000425/ts/vermont_gay_marriage.html&quot;&gt;been approved&lt;/a&gt; by the state&apos;s lawmakers. &quot;&lt;i&gt;The continued denial of these legal protections, benefits and responsibilities to a small but vulnerable class of Vermont&apos;s citizens diminishes their humanity, dignity, freedom and independence.&lt;/i&gt;&quot; It&apos;s about damn time, hopefully other states will soon follow suit. Oh, and if you have a problem with this, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/trash/homosexuality.mp3&quot;&gt;listen to this&lt;/a&gt; and let me know why you continue to have problems with it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1448</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:50:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilRights</category>
		<category>CivilUnions</category>
		<category>DomesticPartnership</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>GayRights</category>
		<category>HumanRights</category>
		<category>Marriage</category>
		<category>Sexuality</category>
		<category>Vermont</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1059/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://frc.org/radio/c00c02.html"&gt;An informed view of prop twenty-two.&lt;/a&gt; This may be a bit belated, but it&apos;s astonishing that someone could come up with a comparison like this and actually believe that it had any worth in judgment or persuasion.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1059</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:49:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>CivilUnions</category>
		<category>DomesticPartnership</category>
		<category>FamilyResearchCouncil</category>
		<category>FRC</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>JanetParshall</category>
		<dc:creator>EngineBeak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


