<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with GeorgeBush and government</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/GeorgeBush+government</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'GeorgeBush' and 'government' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:16:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:16:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>It&apos;s leaking all over my democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28997/Its%2Dleaking%2Dall%2Dover%2Dmy%2Ddemocracy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/nation/7023679.htm"&gt;Bush orders officials to stop the leaks.&lt;/a&gt; News of Bush&apos;s order leaked almost immediately.  And speaking of leaks, two U.S. officials are the primary sources of information about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/10/12/MN304430.DTL&quot;&gt;Israel&apos;s Harpoon cruise &lt;/a&gt;missiles &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/348730.html&quot;&gt;which may or may not be used to attack Iran&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28997</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:16:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>leaks</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Department of Justice... Ha!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28691/Department%2Dof%2DJustice%2DHa</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;cid=68&amp;amp;ncid=68&amp;amp;e=2&amp;amp;u=/nyt/20031002/ts_nyt/attorneygeneraliscloselylinkedtoinquiryfigures"&gt;Attorney General Is Closely Linked to Inquiry Figures&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Karl Rove, President Bush (news - web sites)&apos;s top political adviser, whose possible role in the case has raised questions, was a paid consultant to three of Mr. Ashcroft&apos;s campaigns in Missouri, twice for governor and for United States senator, in the 1980&apos;s and 1990&apos;s, an associate of Mr. Rove said on Wednesday.   Jack Oliver, the deputy finance chairman of Mr. Bush&apos;s 2004 re-election campaign, was the director of Mr. Ashcroft&apos;s 1994 Senate campaign, and later worked as Mr. Ashcroft&apos;s deputy chief of staff.&lt;/em&gt;  No wonder &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29560-2003Oct1.html&quot;&gt;69% of Americans&lt;/a&gt; think that an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/000601.html&quot;&gt;independent counsel&lt;/a&gt; should conduct the investigation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28691</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:48:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ashcroft</category>
		<category>AttorneyGeneral</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>DepartmentOfJustice</category>
		<category>DOJ</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>investigation</category>
		<category>JohnAshcroft</category>
		<category>KarlRove</category>
		<category>nepotism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Rove</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>John Dean case for War in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27066/John%2DDean%2Dcase%2Dfor%2DWar%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20030718.html"&gt;John Dean&apos;s analysis of the administrations case for War.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;What I found, in critically examining Bush&apos;s evidence, is not pretty. The African uranium matter is merely indicative of larger problems, and troubling questions of potential and widespread criminality when taking the nation to war. It appears that not only the Niger uranium hoax, but most everything else that Bush said about Saddam Hussein&apos;s weapons was false, fabricated, exaggerated, or phony.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27066</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 01:42:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>cia</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>johndean</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>un</category>
		<category>unitednations</category>
		<category>unscom</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>who is this richard perle guy anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24180/who%2Dis%2Dthis%2Drichard%2Dperle%2Dguy%2Danyway</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030317fa_fact"&gt;who is this richard perle guy anyway?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
is anyone else a little concerned with some of his views and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&amp;c=3&amp;s=vest&quot;&gt;associations&lt;/a&gt; being one of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/organizations/foreignpolicy/defense_policy_board.htm&quot;&gt;top advisors&lt;/a&gt; to our current administration?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24180</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:55:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advisor</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>NewYorker</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RichardPerle</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20071/</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;&quot;One nationally renowned academic ... was recently called by an administration official to talk about serving on an HHS [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] advisory committee.... To the candidate&apos;s surprise, the official asked for the professor&apos;s views on embryo cell research, cloning and physician-assisted suicide. After that, the candidate said, the interviewer told the candidate that the position would have to go to someone else because the candidate&apos;s views did not match those of the administration.&quot;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;

The overhaul of the U.S. public health advisory committee system begins with politics and ends with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26554-2002Sep16.html&quot;&gt;canning those who disagree with George W. Bush.&lt;/a&gt; The public interest is somehow left out of the process.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20071</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2002 06:38:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>appointments</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HHS</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>PrinceValium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19465/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61040-2002Aug25.html"&gt;Administration Says It Can Attack Iraq without Congressional Approval&lt;/a&gt; Not a new story, per se, but this Post article lays out pretty well the arguments behind the administration&apos;s case, one being simply Bush&apos;s role as commander-in-chief. It&apos;s strange how closely this issue reflects earlier attempts by the administration to avoid Congressional and/or public scrutiny (Cheney&apos;s Enron meetings, for example). Why this aversion, and why fight so hard? And I have a sneaking fear that Bush will seek Congressional approval only after invading, and he will bully votes by claiming that reps have a patriotic duty to support a president in a time of war.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19465</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:16:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>risenc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16212/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020409/ap_on_bi_ge/taxes_who_pays_4&amp;amp;printer=1"&gt;I&apos;m curious,&lt;/a&gt; isn&apos;t this exactly opposite of what we&apos;re being told?  I&apos;m always hearing the wealthy are benefitting somehow from GWB&apos;s new tax plan.  I&apos;m certainly no-where near the top 5%, and now I don&apos;t want to be.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16212</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 10:01:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>the_0ne</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14226/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washdc/2002/01/27/bush-welfare.htm"&gt;Bush wants $100M to urge welfare moms to marry&lt;/a&gt; What will he want next $100M to urge Atheists to become Christians.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14226</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:35:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>mothers</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>single</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USAToday</category>
		<category>welfare</category>
		<dc:creator>onegoodmove</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14114/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/THE_TALK_OF_THE_TOWN/CONTENT/?020128ta_talk_lemann&quot;&gt;The most sensible take I&apos;ve seen&lt;/a&gt; on Enron and Bush. &lt;i&gt;Once all the fuss has died down&#8212;Congress is currently planning ten separate inquiries&#8212;two good things will probably have come out of the Enron mess. Companies will no longer be allowed to use their pension programs to treat their employees as an especially loyal and malleable class of shareholder; instead, pension funds will have to be diversified. And accounting firms will no longer be allowed to act as paid consultants to the companies they audit, as Arthur Andersen did with Enron.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;New Yorker&lt;/b&gt; link, no registration required.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14114</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:07:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>Enron</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NewYorker</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13135/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011214/pl/bush_drugs_1.html"&gt;Bush: Drug users=terrorist lackeys&lt;/a&gt; George W. Bush says if you just quit drugs, terrorism will go away.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13135</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 12:41:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>bushadministration</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>georgebush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>warondrugs</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>brookish</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8917/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37723-2001Jul9.html"&gt;Bush&lt;/a&gt; is at it again. &lt;br&gt;
Is the fact that he is able to get away with things like this an indication of a backlash against the more &lt;i&gt;open&lt;/i&gt; years of Democrats in the White House?&lt;br&gt;
Is this secretly what the American public wants?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8917</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:38:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Army</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>charity</category>
		<category>deal</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>Salvation</category>
		<category>SalvationArmy</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>TiggleTaggleTiger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7048/</link>
		<description> Affirmative action seems to be taking root in an unlikely place: the Bush White House. &quot;There&apos;s been talk inside and outside the administration about having no more than half the 484 political positions in the cabinet and agencies go to white males and at least 30 percent to women,&quot; Fred Barnes writes in the conservative &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklystandard.com/magazine/mag_6_30_01/barnes_art_6_30_01.asp&quot;&gt;Weekly Standard&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7048</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:17:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AffirmativeAction</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WeeklyStandard</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5798/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0106/ridgeway4.shtml"&gt;Revealing look&lt;/a&gt; at Bush&apos;s policy and cabinet.   Scary.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5798</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:30:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>cabinet</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>VillageVoice</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5559/</link>
		<description> Christian States of America according to President Dubya. Government &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/bush_abortionrights010122.html&quot;&gt;should
                    not fund international family-planning groups&lt;/A&gt;, but &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/bush_faith010128.html&quot;&gt;should
                    fund faith-based programs&lt;/A&gt;. Someone please pinch me so I can
                    wake up and discover this is just a bad dream.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5559</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:21:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


