<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with GlobalWarming and carbon</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/GlobalWarming+carbon</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'GlobalWarming' and 'carbon' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:08:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:08:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Sucking CO2</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72379/Sucking%2DCO2</link>
		<description> Sucking CO2 out of the air has long been a holy grail for solving global warming; Richard Branson has promised $25m to anyone who succeeds. Of course it&apos;s already been done, but the amount of energy required doesn&apos;t make it net carbon positive. Now a team in Arizona, led by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/lacknerCV.html&quot;&gt;Klaus Lacknet&lt;/a&gt; under the company of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grestech.com/&quot;&gt;Global Research Technologies&lt;/a&gt;, says it has made a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/31/carbonemissions.climatechange&quot;&gt;significant breakthrough&lt;/a&gt; that massively reduces the amount of energy required - the &quot;project has reached the stage where it is quite clear we can do it.&quot;  The planned prototype, which will be finished in two years, will cost $200,000 USD, be smaller than a shipping container and be capable of eliminating around 1 ton of CO2. Even if it works many hurdles remain but it portends a cooler future for air-capture technology.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72379</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:08:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aircapture</category>
		<category>carbon</category>
		<category>carbondioxide</category>
		<category>climatechange</category>
		<category>co2</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Are dead-tree magazines good or bad for the climate?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67803/Are%2Ddeadtree%2Dmagazines%2Dgood%2Dor%2Dbad%2Dfor%2Dthe%2Dclimate</link>
		<description> &quot;So by this analysis &lt;strong&gt;dead-tree magazines have a smaller net carbon footprint than web media.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2007/12/are-dead-tree-m.html&quot;&gt;We cut down trees and put them in the ground. From a climate change perspective, this is a good thing&lt;/a&gt;&quot; explains Chris Anderson, Wired Magazine&apos;s editor-in-chief. While some decry this type of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_footprint&quot;&gt;carbon footprint&lt;/a&gt; accounting as &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/125/viewpoint.html#cheating&quot;&gt;cheating&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://chrislang.org/2007/12/20/the-paper-industry-and-the-business-of-climate-change/&quot;&gt; paper industry has lately been eager to convince the public that they are carbon-neutral.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67803</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:12:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>carbon</category>
		<category>climatechange</category>
		<category>deadtree</category>
		<category>deforestation</category>
		<category>environment</category>
		<category>forests</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<category>greenwash</category>
		<category>magazine</category>
		<category>magazines</category>
		<category>paper</category>
		<category>print</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sequestration</category>
		<category>sustainability</category>
		<category>trees</category>
		<category>whitewash</category>
		<dc:creator>finite</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Carbon emissions database of global electric power plants</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66546/Carbon%2Demissions%2Ddatabase%2Dof%2Dglobal%2Delectric%2Dpower%2Dplants</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://carma.org/&quot;&gt;CARMA&lt;/a&gt;, released &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071114/ap_on_sc/carbon_map;_ylt=AnYhel5PO6wKSHkZCrtmQsGs0NUE&quot;&gt;today&lt;/a&gt;, is a map/database that shows the carbon emissions of more than 50,000 power plants and 4,000 power companies in every country on Earth, showing not only the worst but the best. Find out how much CO2 comes from electricity plants in a particular city, county, congressional district, company, town, ZIP code, or an individual plant.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66546</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:19:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>carbon</category>
		<category>carbonemissions</category>
		<category>climatechange</category>
		<category>electricity</category>
		<category>emissions</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Apocalypse, Schmapocalypse</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45760/Apocalypse%2DSchmapocalypse</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/10/science/10arctic.html?ex=1286596800&amp;amp;en=9f4059694b711260&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss"&gt;Global warming -- the upside:&lt;/a&gt; the entrepreneurs poised to make millions from new ports and shipping lanes in the formerly ice-bound Arctic circle. A fascinating New York Times article on the international land-grab following the news (reported &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18725124.500&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/45474&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;,  whitewashed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/06/20010611-2.html&quot;&gt; here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;i&gt;et. al.&lt;/i&gt;) that the polar ice caps and Siberian permafrost are melting.  Goodbye Gulf Stream, hello Club Med Santa-style -- first SUV to the North Pole wins!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45760</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:24:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arctic</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>carbon</category>
		<category>climate</category>
		<category>Earth</category>
		<category>entrepreneurs</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<category>Kyoto</category>
		<category>Norway</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>polarice</category>
		<category>poles</category>
		<category>Russia</category>
		<category>territory</category>
		<category>weather</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>biolithium crystals</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43026/biolithium%2Dcrystals</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eprida.com/index.html"&gt;Eprida:&lt;/a&gt; using biomass to produce hydrogen, reduce the emissions of coal-fired power plants, and suck CO2 out of the atmosphere, all while improving agricultural productivity.  A new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eprida.com/hydro/&quot;&gt;virtuous&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eprida.com/eprida_flash.html&quot;&gt;cycle&lt;/a&gt; (flash)?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43026</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:18:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>carbon</category>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<dc:creator>alms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


