<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with GrandOldParty</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/GrandOldParty</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'GrandOldParty' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 09:34:32 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 09:34:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>GOP No More!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22017/GOP%2DNo%2DMore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43809-2002Nov26.html"&gt;Want to talk about GOP?  Not in the WSJ!&lt;/a&gt; The latest WSJ internal style guide has banned the use of GOP (Grand Old Party) as a reference that too few would be familar with.  Republicans seem to find it amusing, considering their domain name, however.  I&apos;d just been speaking about this to a colleague a few days ago when someone at lunch asked what a GOP was.  Do the other mediums follow suit?  Is this as big a deal as some publications using the term &quot;homicide bomber&quot; instead of &quot;suicide bomber?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22017</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 09:34:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>GrandOldParty</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Republican</category>
		<category>StyleGuide</category>
		<category>WallStreetJournal</category>
		<dc:creator>djspicerack</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


