<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with GreenParty and RalphNader</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/GreenParty+RalphNader</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'GreenParty' and 'RalphNader' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:03:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:03:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Nader&apos;s nadir</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33971/Naders%2Dnadir</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/9020861.htm"&gt;The Green Party rejects Ralph Nader.&lt;/a&gt; On the second ballot at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gp.org/convention/&quot;&gt;Green Party nominating convention&lt;/a&gt; held today in Milwaukee, WI, David Cobb defeated Peter Camajo (Nader&apos;s running mate) for the Green Party nomination, thereby denying Nader automatic placement onto the ballot in 23 states.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33971</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:03:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Milwaukee</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>Wisconsin</category>
		<dc:creator>thewittyname</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21274/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sltrib.com/2002/oct/10272002/nation_w/11119.htm"&gt;Ralph repents? Or something?&lt;/a&gt; The man many Democrats see as just a few steps short of an evil spawn of Satan for being a 2000 election spoiler has issued statements of support for 13 non-Green candidates in tight races. These are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/27/national/27SEAS.html?ex=1036386000&amp;en=9bfef4580871e677&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot;&gt;all Democrats&lt;/a&gt;, including Jean Carnahan (Mo.), Tim Johnson (S.D.) and Tom Strickland (Co.). &quot;I certainly don&apos;t want Republicans controlling Congress,&quot; Nader said. What happened to the &quot;things have to get worse before they get better&quot; theory? Or has the situation in D.C. indeed grown so bad that at least &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; Dems. are turning far enough left for Nader? (Note: He&apos;d thrown support behind Wellstone, even though there&apos;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/nm/20021021/pl_nm/politics_green_dc_1&quot;&gt;Green candidate&lt;/a&gt; for Senate in Minn.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21274</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:40:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Election2002</category>
		<category>endorsement</category>
		<category>Green</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Greens</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>SaltLakeCityTribune</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9924/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.consortiumnews.com/Print/090501.html"&gt;Is Nader Right?&lt;/a&gt; Or is he just fooling himself? I mean, even I can tell the difference between Democrats and Republicans.  Apparently, the best Ralph can ever hope for is to ruin the Democratic party.  If I were a Republican, I&apos;d be donating to the Green party right about now.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9924</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2001 07:03:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<dc:creator>Jart</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4515/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.workingforchange.com/news/article.cfm?ItemId=9898"&gt;What went wrong for Ralph?&lt;/a&gt; Now that the whining and accusations has died down a little, it&apos;s time to finally ask the hard question: &lt;b&gt;So why &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; Ralph Nader do so badly?&lt;/b&gt;. Did his campaign drift too far left? Was Winnona LaDuke the right running mate? Did the Green party help or hurt him?  What did Nader himself do to screw his own campaign. 
  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4515</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:36:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>3rd</category>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>Greens</category>
		<category>hindsight</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>Party</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>review</category>
		<dc:creator>lagado</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4304/</link>
		<description> I know it is cheap and easy to link to Salon, but I imagine this might make interesting conversation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/15/nader/index.html &quot;&gt;&lt;B&gt;We can thank Nader and his supporters for the election mess -- and they&apos;re not even sorry.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&apos;t you idiots know the Democratic party owns your votes? Quit being so selfish.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4304</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:57:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democraticparty</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>thirteen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3920/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://salon.com/politics/feature/2000/10/28/stocks/index.html"&gt;nader&apos;s stock portfolio&lt;/a&gt; &quot;In the financial disclosure form Nader filed on June 14, the Green Party presidential candidate revealed that he owns between $100,000 and $250,000 worth of shares in the Fidelity Magellan Fund. The fund controls 4,321,400 shares of Occidental Petroleum stock.&quot;
Read on for more...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3920</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2000 06:38:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election2000</category>
		<category>green</category>
		<category>greenparty</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>uspresident</category>
		<dc:creator>saralovering</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3805/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://greensforgore.org/"&gt;Greens for Gore&lt;/a&gt; have a voting strategy. If you like Nader, you might want to see what they have in mind.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3805</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2000 19:24:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GreenParty</category>
		<category>GreensForGore</category>
		<category>Nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RalphNader</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>aprilgem</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


