<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Guardian and language</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Guardian+language</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Guardian' and 'language' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:18:04 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:18:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;I notice the &apos;wank&apos; has remained fairly constant.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80553/I%2Dnotice%2Dthe%2Dwank%2Dhas%2Dremained%2Dfairly%2Dconstant</link>
		<description> &quot;The editor&apos;s guidelines are as follows: First, remember the reader, and respect demands that we should not casually use words that are likely to offend. Second, use such words only when absolutely necessary to the facts of a piece, or to portray a character in an article; there is almost never a case in which we need to use a swearword outside direct quotes. Third, the stronger the swearword, the harder we ought to think about using it.Finally, never use asterisks, which are just a cop-out.&quot; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/apr/03/research-digital-media&quot;&gt;Swearing in The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/twhume/3407112348/&quot;&gt;A chart&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80553</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:18:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chart</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>newspaper</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>swearing</category>
		<category>TheGuardian</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Speaking of sports...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78445/Speaking%2Dof%2Dsports</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/19/baseball-metaphor-media"&gt;The Guardian is knocked for six by American sport references in British media&lt;/a&gt; Creeping cultural imperialism?  The effect of internet media from foreign news outlets?  Or just Guardian handwringing about something no one else notices?  Is British media alone in this trend?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78445</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:35:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>American</category>
		<category>baseball</category>
		<category>British</category>
		<category>cricket</category>
		<category>guardian</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>sports</category>
		<dc:creator>Grrlscout</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>More on arithmetic in the Amazon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36640/More%2Don%2Darithmetic%2Din%2Dthe%2DAmazon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,,1331672,00.html"&gt;More on arithmetic in the Amazon&lt;/a&gt; The 10/15 issue of Science has the official publication of Peter Gordon&apos;s work on numerical cognition among the Pirah&amp;#0227;, and a companion article by Pierre Pica et al. on similar research among another Amazonian tribe, the Munduruk&amp;#0250;. What with the U.S. election and the discovery of H. Floresiensis, this is not getting nearly as a much play as the pre-publication back in August of Peter Gordon&apos;s work.

Brian Butterworth has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,,1331672,00.html&quot;&gt;piece &lt;/a&gt;in the Guardian about both articles, and I&apos;ve put some links, quotes and diagrams &lt;a href=&quot;http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001611.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
Compared to the reports on the Pirah&amp;#0227;, the Munduruk&amp;#0250; people, language, and experiments are all somewhat different, although the conclusions are broadly similar.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36640</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 03:37:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amazon</category>
		<category>Amazonian</category>
		<category>Brazil</category>
		<category>Chomsky</category>
		<category>counting</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>indian</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>Munduruku</category>
		<category>numbers</category>
		<category>NumericalCognition</category>
		<category>PeterGordon</category>
		<category>piraha</category>
		<category>vocabulary</category>
		<category>words</category>
		<dc:creator>myl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Speak Proper!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29057/Speak%2DProper</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,1066667,00.html"&gt;mumbo jumbo...&lt;/a&gt; BBC journalist John Humphrys bemoans the abuses suffered by the English language.  At the risk of becoming a Grumpy Old Man before my time I can&apos;t help but agree with him, in particular about the Management Speak. I recently came across the verb &quot;to hero&quot; which set my teeth on edge. And just what the hell does &quot;to leverage&quot; mean?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29057</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 01:30:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>English</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>JohnHumprys</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<dc:creator>jontyjago</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18876/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,7792,768050,00.html"&gt;blimey charlie the french are getting right hot&lt;/a&gt; under the collar.  There is growing indignation in france at the creeping use of the english language.  Well now it seems that the EU, with an impeccable track record of supporting the french is suddenly ruffling a few feathers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18876</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 03:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>English</category>
		<category>EU</category>
		<category>EuropeanUnion</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>French</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<dc:creator>johnnyboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


