<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with HarryPotter and Potter</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/HarryPotter+Potter</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'HarryPotter' and 'Potter' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:42:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:42:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Harry Potter and Lord Wal-d-mart</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55853/Harry%2DPotter%2Dand%2DLord%2DWaldmart</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no0WqYWdH74"&gt;Harry Potter and Lord Wal-d-mart:&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=http://www.latenightplayers.com&gt;Late Night Players&lt;/a&gt; entertain us this friday: Harry Potter combats the low low prices of Wal-Mart.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55853</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:42:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>funny</category>
		<category>harrypotter</category>
		<category>potter</category>
		<category>sketch</category>
		<category>skit</category>
		<category>walmart</category>
		<dc:creator>cjoh</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sonorus!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29907/Sonorus</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lp.org/lpnews/0309/harrypotter.html"&gt;Harry Potter: The New Atlas Shrugged.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29907</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:06:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>HarryPotter</category>
		<category>Libertarian</category>
		<category>Libertarians</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Potter</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Espoo2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20636/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=entertainmentnews&amp;amp;StoryID=1548633"&gt;The Gospel According to Harry Potter.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.connieneal.com/The-Gospel-According-To-Harry-Potter/From-Connie-Neal.htm&quot;&gt;Connie Neal &lt;/a&gt;thinks that she sees &quot;glimmers of the Gospel&quot; in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scholastic.com/harrypotter/home.asp&quot;&gt;Harry Potter books&lt;/a&gt;.  Not the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2001/151/22.0.html&quot;&gt;most interesting&lt;/a&gt; attempt to counter the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spotlightministries.org.uk/harrypotterarticle.htm&quot;&gt;occult&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucg.org/articles/gn38/family.html&quot;&gt;hysteria&lt;/a&gt; surrounding this book, but sure to stir up some hilarious controversy just the same.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20636</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 08:47:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>Christians</category>
		<category>ConnieNeal</category>
		<category>Gospel</category>
		<category>HarryPotter</category>
		<category>literature</category>
		<category>Potter</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>mikrophon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12464/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/ap/20011118/en/box_office_621.html"&gt;As Harry Potter tops all box office records,&lt;/a&gt; it seems that some parents don&apos;t want their kids to watch the film &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/nm/20011116/en/film-potterschool_1.html&quot;&gt;because some think it promotes witchcraft.&lt;/a&gt; Are separation of church and state arguments valid here, or are the parents a bunch of wet blankets?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12464</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2001 23:38:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>HarryPotter</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<category>Potter</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>witchcraft</category>
		<dc:creator>Rastafari</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2995/</link>
		<description> Aw, for the love of Kee-rist, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2000/SHOWBIZ/Movies/08/23/uk.potter/index.html&quot;&gt;can&apos;t anyone quit screwing with stuff&lt;/a&gt;?
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Columbus plans to shoot parallel versions of the first film -- one for the U.S.
                  market and one for Britain. His plan is to shoot two or three alternate sequences
                  for each film and to give the British film the first novel&apos;s original British title,
                  &quot;Harry Potter and the Philosopher&apos;s Stone.&quot; The American film will be called,
                  &quot;Harry Potter and the Sorcerer&apos;s Stone.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2995</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:01:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>harrypotter</category>
		<category>jkrowling</category>
		<category>movie</category>
		<category>potter</category>
		<category>rowling</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2376/</link>
		<description> While I&apos;m not a fan of Harry Potter books (yet - I&apos;ll get around to checking them out someday soon), I find it interesting to see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2000/books/news/07/06/trouble.harry/index.html&quot;&gt;some folks still strongly oppose the stories of sorcery&lt;/a&gt;, while it seems &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/POLL/results/1129051.content.html&quot;&gt;the average CNN.com reader doesn&apos;t see a problem&lt;/a&gt; with them (the poll is 97-3 as I write this). It seems that every few years, some fiction strikes the fancy of kids, and parents rally against it, even though it piques kids&apos; imaginations and gets them reading. What&apos;s so wrong with Potter books?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2376</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 21:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>fiction</category>
		<category>HarryPotter</category>
		<category>Potter</category>
		<category>sorcery</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


