<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with ID and intelligentdesign</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/ID+intelligentdesign</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'ID' and 'intelligentdesign' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:25:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:25:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Since when does Hollywood shy away from controversy?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85002/Since%2Dwhen%2Ddoes%2DHollywood%2Dshy%2Daway%2Dfrom%2Dcontroversy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6173399/Charles-Darwin-film-too-controversial-for-religious-America.html"&gt;The Producer Cites Religious Controversy.&lt;/a&gt; The Director points to &lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idCATRE58A4GC20090911&quot;&gt;a recessionary trend against &quot;serious&quot; movies&lt;/a&gt;. A new film about Charles Darwin&apos;s life (&quot;&lt;i&gt;Creation&lt;/i&gt;&quot;) is reportedly having difficulty finding a US distributor.  (&lt;small&gt; &lt;i&gt;Creation&lt;/i&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0974014/&quot;&gt;IMDB&lt;/a&gt; / &lt;a href=&quot;http://creationthemovie.com/&quot;&gt;Official Site&lt;/a&gt; / &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BREvUKpZTeU&quot;&gt;Trailer&lt;/a&gt; / Spoiler-laden &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/09/tiff_4_darwin_walks_out_on_gen.html&quot;&gt;review&lt;/a&gt; from Roger Ebert / LA Times &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-ca-creation6-2009sep06,0,1320146.story&quot;&gt;review&lt;/a&gt; // Darwin: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/78076/On-The-Origin-of-Darwin&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/74425/Science-is-an-integral-part-of-culture&quot;&gt;MeFi&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85002</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:25:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>controversy</category>
		<category>creation</category>
		<category>creationism</category>
		<category>darwin</category>
		<category>distribution</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>ID</category>
		<category>intelligentdesign</category>
		<category>manufacturedcontroversy</category>
		<category>movie</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>review</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;If people do not accept our position on creationism, they do not have to watch.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64221/If%2Dpeople%2Ddo%2Dnot%2Daccept%2Dour%2Dposition%2Don%2Dcreationism%2Dthey%2Ddo%2Dnot%2Dhave%2Dto%2Dwatch</link>
		<description> Guess who&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=766&quot;&gt;censoring references to evolution&lt;/a&gt; out of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Life_of_Mammals&quot;&gt;David Attenborough documentaries&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2007/07/broadcaster_defends_editing_ou.php&quot;&gt;That&apos;s right&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextnature.net/?p=1366&quot;&gt;the Dutch&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cloggie.org/wissewords/index.php?entry=/20070730-eo-censors-attenborough.txt&quot;&gt;See the differences&lt;/a&gt;; here&apos;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://evolutie.blog.com/1962396/#cmts&quot;&gt;detailed write-up by a Dutch biologist and documentary enthusiast&lt;/a&gt; comparing the two versions side-by-side &lt;small&gt;(in Dutch)&lt;/small&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64221</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:42:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>attenborough</category>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>christians</category>
		<category>creationism</category>
		<category>davidattenborough</category>
		<category>documentaries</category>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>dutch</category>
		<category>eo</category>
		<category>evangelischeomroep</category>
		<category>evangelism</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>holland</category>
		<category>id</category>
		<category>intelligentdesign</category>
		<category>lifeofmammals</category>
		<category>netherlands</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>thelifeofmammals</category>
		<category>thenetherlands</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...With bows in her hair, And nothing is better than that</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48964/With%2Dbows%2Din%2Dher%2Dhair%2DAnd%2Dnothing%2Dis%2Dbetter%2Dthan%2Dthat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/07/health/07cnd-fat.html/partner/rssnyt?pagewanted=all"&gt;Science is better:&lt;/a&gt; An enormous scientific study has conclusively demonstrated that &quot;diet had no effect&quot; on rates of women getting cancer or heart disease.  Because the study investigated the efficacy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fatfree.com/diets/ornish.html&quot;&gt;overall low fat diets&lt;/a&gt;, rather than the more recently developed &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterranean_diet&quot;&gt;hypothesis that saturated fats are the only pernicious kind&lt;/a&gt;, some leading medical researchers accept these findings but still think there MAY be a direct link between certain diets and major health problems in women, but (and here&apos;s the money shot) &quot;if they did a study like that and it was negative, then I&apos;d have to give up my cherished hypotheses for data.&quot; Now that, my friends, is a heartwarming example of one of the pinnacles of human creativity, the scientific method, which is under so much attack these days&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/48899&quot;&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/48689&quot;&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47747&quot;&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48964</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:23:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>diet</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>id</category>
		<category>intelligentdesign</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>twsf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>keep your science off my children!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42283/keep%2Dyour%2Dscience%2Doff%2Dmy%2Dchildren</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050530fa_fact"&gt;Why &quot;Intelligent Design&quot; Isn&apos;t.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/&quot;&gt;New Yorker&lt;/a&gt; takes an informative look at the &quot;factual&quot; basis for so-called &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design&quot;&gt;&quot;Intelligent Design&quot;&lt;/a&gt; theory, while an all too infrequent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7963494&quot;&gt;victory&lt;/a&gt; is won in Georgia.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42283</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 19:20:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>creationism</category>
		<category>fuckthiscreationistbullshit</category>
		<category>ID</category>
		<category>intelligentdesign</category>
		<category>pseudoscience</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>scrim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13222/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i17/17a00801.htm"&gt;Intelligent Design - Natural Selection guided by God?&lt;/a&gt; Is every facet of evolution guided by God then?  What about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/grendelthedog/parachutepants.html&quot;&gt;fashion or &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bushorchimp.com&quot;&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13222</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:12:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atheism</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>id</category>
		<category>intelligentdesign</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>hellinskira</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12352/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22789.html"&gt;XP demonstrates &quot;Intelligent design.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; You mean they didn&apos;t evolve it with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.santafe.edu/~shalizi/reviews/holland-on-emergence/&quot;&gt;genetic algorithms&lt;/a&gt;?  Boy, I could swear the past versions were composed of randomly generated code fragments.  (Do read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christianity.com/CC/article/0,,PTID2228|CHID100546|CIID1074576,00.html&quot;&gt;original article&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12352</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:11:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ChuckColson</category>
		<category>creationism</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>fundamentalism</category>
		<category>ID</category>
		<category>IntelligentDesign</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>Watergate</category>
		<category>WindowsXP</category>
		<category>WinXP</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>badstone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


