<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with IQ</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/IQ</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'IQ' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:03:00 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:03:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Two men with big hair and the nature of IQ</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86729/Two%2Dmen%2Dwith%2Dbig%2Dhair%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dnature%2Dof%2DIQ</link>
		<description> Behind the growing Steven Pinker vs. Malcolm Gladwell feud (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/books/review/Pinker-t.html?_r=1&quot;&gt;Pinker criticizes Gladwell&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://gladwell.typepad.com/gladwellcom/2009/11/pinker-on-what-the-dog-saw.html&quot;&gt;Gladwell snarkily replies&lt;/a&gt;) is a debate over the value of IQ, specifically, and intelligence, broadly, in success. Recent research has generally shown&lt;a href=&quot;http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/iq-and-acheivement-pinker-is-kinda-right-and-kinda-wrong/&quot;&gt; little link between intelligence and success within fields&lt;/a&gt;, and that there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://psychologymatters.apa.org/iqtesting.html&quot;&gt;multiple kinds of intelligences&lt;/a&gt; that drive achievement. On the other hand, &lt;a href=&quot;http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2009/01/psychometrics-links.html&quot;&gt;scholars of psychometrics claim the opposite&lt;/a&gt;, showing that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/01/iq-academic-achievement.php&quot;&gt;IQ at an early age can predict achievement&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2009/11/do-advanced-education-and-challenging.html&quot;&gt;no amount of study will help&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&amp;q=cache:QjG7tauuiA4J:muse.jhu.edu/demo/merrill-palmer_quarterly/v047/47.1sternberg.pdf+iq+predictive&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESgmYld9BfERMyFm8seoI47aBO0526LoQKdd1otNzRAi4e3pKKC9BBZpgCpa7KP7L6fTpFRXcjnFvkBxRtD6HE9I6-qu0s4Q9JNJ5BKUZEv0A-fror0_W75MR3QZLGg631Cp2ize&amp;sig=AFQjCNHlp9RNtslxArshSzkUFRkOW48JdA&quot;&gt;Maybe everyone is right, with enough caveats&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86729</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:03:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>pinker</category>
		<dc:creator>blahblahblah</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>iQ Font</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83412/iQ%2DFont</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://designyoutrust.com/2009/07/17/iq-font-when-driving-becomes-writing/&quot;&gt;Cars + fonts = the iQ font.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83412</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:47:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>fonts</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>iqfont</category>
		<dc:creator>billysumday</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Islam, modernity and democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80854/Islam%2Dmodernity%2Dand%2Ddemocracy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3a7d0dfc-24b7-11de-8bb2-00144feabdc0.html"&gt;Is the west thwarting Arab plans for reform?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Few Muslims now invest much hope in the democratic western powers (essentially the US, Britain and France) that back the rulers who oppress them, even if, against the odds, they still admire &#8220;western&#8221; values, science and culture. There is no endemic or intrinsic conflict between Christians and Muslims. Rather, the root of the problem is that a majority of Muslims is convinced that the west &#8211; interested only in a stability based on regional strongmen, the security of Israel and cheap oil &#8211; is engaged in a war against Islam and is bent on denying them the freedoms it claims for itself. That is why it is so self-defeating to collude in tyranny as ostensibly a lesser evil than political Islam.&lt;/i&gt; BONUS
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/4add9230-23d5-11de-996a-00144feabdc0.html&quot; title=&quot;For 22 years, Marilyn vos Savant has been writing a question-and-answer column in a magazine &#8211; an odd choice of career for the record holder of the world&#8217;s highest IQ&quot;&gt;Is a high IQ a burden as much as a blessing?&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80854</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:54:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>savant</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Plastic Brain Outsmarts Experts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72327/Plastic%2DBrain%2DOutsmarts%2DExperts</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=111659&amp;amp;org=NSF"&gt;IQ might not be as static as science originally believed.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72327</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:33:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>socalsamba</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Race and Intelligence, Redux</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67496/Race%2Dand%2DIntelligence%2DRedux</link>
		<description> About a month ago, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/66661/Race-and-Intelligence&quot;&gt;MeFi FPP&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2178122/entry/0/&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; sparked a controversy here on the usefulness of the concepts of IQ and race in determining whether some ethnic groups can be shown to be intrinsically less intelligent than others. Now &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Flynn&quot;&gt;James Flynn&lt;/a&gt;, discoverer of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect&quot;&gt;Flynn effect&lt;/a&gt;, has written a book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=qvBipuypYUkC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=isbn:0521880076&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What is Intelligence?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,  that settles many of the issues of this controversy. In this week&apos;s &lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Gladwell&quot;&gt;Malcolm Gladwell&lt;/a&gt; summarizes Flynn&apos;s arguments succinctly in a review entitled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2007/12/17/071217crbo_books_gladwell&quot;&gt;&quot;None of the Above: What IQ doesn&apos;t tell you about race.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67496</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:51:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flynneffect</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>jamesflynn</category>
		<category>malcolmgladwell</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>thenewyorker</category>
		<dc:creator>ubiquity</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Race and Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66661/Race%2Dand%2DIntelligence</link>
		<description> Among white Americans, the average IQ, as of a decade or so ago, was 103. Among Asian-Americans, it was 106. Among Jewish Americans, it was 113. Among Latino Americans, it was 89. Among African-Americans, it was 85.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2178122/entry/0/&quot;&gt;Was Watson right?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66661</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:45:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>racialintelligence</category>
		<dc:creator>landis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Smart or Stoopid?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58070/Smart%2Dor%2DStoopid</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flashbynight.com/test/&quot;&gt;Are you Smart or Stoopid?&lt;/a&gt;  A quick, entertaining and (for me) reasonably challenging way to determine your level of intelligence.  Be sure to post your score.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58070</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:30:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>test</category>
		<dc:creator>JPowers</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dr Kanazawa.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56095/Dr%2DKanazawa</link>
		<description> I find my interest piqued by some of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/people/s.kanazawa@lse.ac.uk/&quot;&gt;Dr Satoshi Kanazawa&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; ideas. Especially regarding &lt;a href=&quot;http://human-nature.com/ep/articles/ep04120128.html&quot;&gt;The conformist culture of Asia&lt;/a&gt;. But also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodologyInstitute/pdf/SKanazawa/MDE2005.pdf&quot;&gt;The Myth of Racial Discrimination in Pay in the United States&lt;/a&gt;[pdf]. He works hard &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodologyInstitute/whosWho/profiles/s.kanazawa@lse.ac.uk.htm&quot;&gt;thinking&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56095</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:44:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>evolutionary_psychology</category>
		<category>Intelligence</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>Kanazawa</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>Satoshi</category>
		<dc:creator>econous</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Get Smart</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50767/Get%2DSmart</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1723801,00.html"&gt;Get Smart!&lt;/a&gt; Can a few simple exercises really sharpen your mental acuity in 7 short days? According to this BBC program, yes.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50767</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 16:00:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>smart</category>
		<dc:creator>vronsky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>smart_women != married_women; smart_men == married_men</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38304/smartwomen%2Dmarriedwomen%2Dsmartmen%2Dmarriedmen</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1423032_1,00.html&quot;&gt;A high IQ is a hindrance for women wanting to get married while it is an asset for men&lt;/a&gt;, according to a study by four British universities.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The study found the likelihood of marriage increased by 35 per cent for boys for each 16 point increase in IQ. But for girls, there is a 40 per cent drop for each 16-point rise, according to the survey by the universities of Aberdeen, Bristol, Edinburgh and Glasgow. The study is based on the IQs of 900 men and women between their 10th and 40th birthdays. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200501/s1275515.htm&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38304</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 03:09:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>greatbritain</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<dc:creator>airguitar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Check out the big brains on these guys!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35777/Check%2Dout%2Dthe%2Dbig%2Dbrains%2Don%2Dthese%2Dguys</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eintell/index.shtml"&gt;Human Intelligence&lt;/a&gt; is a good site from Indiana University that looks at historical influences and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eintell/hotTopics.shtml&quot;&gt;current controversies&lt;/a&gt; surrounding the study of intelligence. Find out more about topics such as &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eintell/mozarteffect2.shtml&quot;&gt;the Mozart Effect&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, the theory of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eintell/mitheory.shtml&quot;&gt;multiple intelligences&lt;/a&gt;, and the influence of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eintell/birthOrder.shtml&quot;&gt;birth order&lt;/a&gt; on intelligence, and then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eintell/map.shtml&quot;&gt;browse the brains&lt;/a&gt; behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eintell/periodIndex.shtml&quot;&gt;history&lt;/a&gt; of inquiry into human intellect.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35777</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:33:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>intelligencetesting</category>
		<category>intelligencetheory</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>testing</category>
		<category>theory</category>
		<dc:creator>taz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s the IQ, stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35216/Its%2Dthe%2DIQ%2Dstupid</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/comment/story/0,14259,1291916,00.html"&gt;&quot;Innate intelligence has to do with capability and ignorance to do with variables such as educational opportunity and personal diligence.&lt;/a&gt; But the conundrum remains. Is intellect important in presidents? If Americans can&apos;t solve the question definitively in the matter of John Kerry and George Bush, we damn sure ought to make an educated guess.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35216</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 04:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aptitude</category>
		<category>diligence</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>presidents</category>
		<category>USPresidents</category>
		<dc:creator>acrobat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Big brains, crap design skills.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34550/Big%2Dbrains%2Dcrap%2Ddesign%2Dskills</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gigasociety.org/gigaweb.htm"&gt;Giga Society:&lt;/a&gt; the world&apos;s most exclusive high IQ society, where an IQ of 196 or higher (one in a billion) is required to join. Not quite as cranially-advantaged? Well, there&apos;s always the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oathsociety.com/&quot;&gt;Oath society&lt;/a&gt;, which&apos;ll take you if you&apos;re only one in a thousand (a mere 150 IQ or higher). Big brains and design skills (or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iqsociety.org/intro.htm&quot; title=&quot;WIN organization name (World Intelligence Network) discloses the victorious and celebratory character of this concept facing the new, emergent reality of the intelligence world.&quot;&gt;language ones&lt;/a&gt;, for that matter) don&apos;t mix well, though, it would seem. &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34550</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:22:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>baddesign</category>
		<category>doofi</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Morons for Bush?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32942/Morons%2Dfor%2DBush</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://americanassembler.com/features/iq_state_averages.htm"&gt;2000 Election results ranked by avg statewide IQ.&lt;/a&gt; Shame on me for even posting this here in this slavering den of liberal fervor, but if it&apos;s true, it certainly is kinda fascinating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32942</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 09:37:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>voters</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>let the mefi pissing contest begin!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29194/let%2Dthe%2Dmefi%2Dpissing%2Dcontest%2Dbegin</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iq-test.dk/"&gt;&quot;Check out the big brain on Brett!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; ... A visual IQ test.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29194</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:20:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>iqtest</category>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Money makes you stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25566/Money%2Dmakes%2Dyou%2Dstupid</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/testthenation/results/"&gt;The more you earn, the lower your IQ.&lt;/a&gt; That&apos;s the clear but unexpected result from the second &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/testthenation/results/index.shtml&quot;&gt;National IQ test&lt;/a&gt; broadcast by the BBC.  The test is still online if you are curious.  The first test was discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/17080&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  For a higher IQ, be an unemployed Irish man and drink too much.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25566</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 05:28:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>quiz</category>
		<category>test</category>
		<category>TestTheNation</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>grahamwell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lamont, you dummy!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23953/Lamont%2Dyou%2Ddummy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993451"&gt;Stupidity should be cured, says DNA discoverer.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;People say it would be terrible if we made all girls pretty. I think it would be great.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23953</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:30:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dna</category>
		<category>eugenics</category>
		<category>geneticengineering</category>
		<category>genetics</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>jameswatson</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>watson</category>
		<dc:creator>ColdChef</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>International High IQ Society tests</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21612/International%2DHigh%2DIQ%2DSociety%2Dtests</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.highiqsociety.org/noflash/nonmembers/iqtests.htm"&gt;International High IQ Society tests.&lt;/a&gt; The site gives the impression that these tests are a lot more accurate at judging intelligence (whatever that is) that most of the junk on the web. What do you think? Do we have any &apos;universal geniuses&apos;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21612</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:45:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>genius</category>
		<category>highiq</category>
		<category>intelligencequotient</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<dc:creator>Pretty_Generic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18976/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sites.ninemsn.com.au/minisite/testaustralia/"&gt;How smart are you?&lt;/a&gt; Are &lt;a href=&quot;http://sites.ninemsn.com.au/minisite/testaustralia/06082002/haircolour/default.asp&quot;&gt;blondes&lt;/a&gt; really as dumb as people say?  Does an IQ test administered via television/net/SMS have any validity anyway?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18976</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 16:40:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>games</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>realitytv</category>
		<category>tests</category>
		<dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18051/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arts.scotsman.com/headlines_specific.cfm?id=5492&quot; title=&quot;smarter than your average bear, Boo Boo&quot;&gt;Musicians are really smart&lt;/a&gt;. They have larger and more sensitive brains than non-musicians, and their collective IQ is much higher. They have 130% more grey matter in one area of their auditory cortexes. The question of how this explains Ozzy Osbourne nonwithstanding, I&apos;ll  bet if you&apos;re really, really smart, you could be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.menwithouthats.com/talent.html&quot; title=&quot;and bring your own equipment, not a load of crap, like they say on the site.&quot;&gt;one of the new members of Men Without Hats&lt;/a&gt;. Must be very knowledgeable in midi, sequences, and sampling.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18051</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:59:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>musicians</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>iconomy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17080/</link>
		<description> Last night, ninety-five thousand British Internet users took part in &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/testthenation/&quot;&gt;Test The Nation&lt;/a&gt;&apos;, an IQ quiz, broadcast live on BBC television, which attempted to survey the intelligence on the national.  As a simulcast it was only partially successful -- the questions appearing on television sometimes five minutes before appearing on computer, but the results from those who coped with the technology were quite interesting.  Any other UK Mefites take part?  The test is still available for the curious.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17080</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2002 08:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>testthenation</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15587/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992051"&gt;Rejection reduces IQ&lt;/a&gt; &quot;To live in society, people have to have an inner mechanism that regulates their behaviour. Rejection defeats the purpose of this, and people become impulsive and self-destructive. You have to use self-control to analyse a problem in an IQ test, for example - and instead, you behave impulsively&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15587</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:09:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>behavior</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>impulsecontrol</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>newscientist</category>
		<category>rejection</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<dc:creator>zeoslap</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15216/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/02/education/02BOY.html?pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position=bottom"&gt;Genius boy&apos;s mother admits faking his tests.&lt;/a&gt; We&apos;re coming to the end of a very sad story.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15216</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2002 12:38:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>child</category>
		<category>fake</category>
		<category>genius</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>justinchapman</category>
		<category>test</category>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15194/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228test.html"&gt;Take the Wonderlic test.&lt;/a&gt; The Wonderlic is a 50-question &lt;a href=&quot;http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228.html&quot;&gt;IQ test administered by the National Football League&lt;/a&gt; to all prospective draft picks.  Teams use the test results to varying degree, in part to determine the ability of athletes to learn systems and grow as a player.  Interestingly, offensive tackles and centers have the highest average NFL Wonderlic scores. (The test here is a fast 15-question sample; you&apos;ll need a piece of paper to jot down your answers.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15194</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:40:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>football</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>nfl</category>
		<category>testing</category>
		<dc:creator>werty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14038/</link>
		<description> Is intelligence hereditary or environment? A &lt;a href=&quot;http://unisci.com/stories/20021/0117021.htm&quot;&gt;new theory&lt;/a&gt; sees the brain as a plastic mold of potential with the more neuron connections the better [hereditary] and environment stimulation shapes the mold untill maturity. &lt;i&gt; &quot;You could present a person with an IQ of 200 with the appropriate phenomena when they are 20 years old, after the critical learning period, and they would not have the capacity to adapt their brains to the new phenomena&quot;. &lt;/i&gt; People of low IQ perform poorly because their brains do not adapt well to environmental stimulation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14038</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iq</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>theory</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


