<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with IanBuruma</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/IanBuruma</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'IanBuruma' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:37:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:37:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The appeal of authoritarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64812/The%2Dappeal%2Dof%2Dauthoritarianism</link>
		<description> Ian Buruma reviews &lt;em&gt;World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism&lt;/em&gt;, by senior neo-conservative &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20590&quot;&gt;Norman Podhoretz&lt;/a&gt;, in the New York Review of Books. &lt;em&gt;The key to Podhoretz&apos;s politics seems to me to lie right there: the longing for power, for toughness, for the Shtarker [strong man] who doesn&apos;t give a damn about anyone or anything, and hatred of the contemptible, cowardly liberals with their pandering ways and their double standards. Since Podhoretz, himself a bookish man, can never be a Shtarker, his government must fill that role, and not give a damn about anyone or anything.&lt;/em&gt; One comment by Buruma echoes a similar observation in Hannah Arendt&apos;s &lt;em&gt;The Origins of Totalitarianism&lt;/em&gt;: he suggests that one reason for the prominence of Jewish neo-conservatives, despite the fact that most American Jews are liberals, may be the &quot;traditional appeal of strong, benevolent empires, from the monarchy of Franz Joseph to George W. Bush&apos;s republic, as shields against bigots, racists, and tyrants&quot;.

Buruma notes that Podhoretz is a foreign policy advisor to Giulani.

Who still supports Bush at this point? Buruma describes how they feel: &lt;blockquote&gt;... criticism of the Bush administration has indeed become more common as the war in Iraq has degenerated into bloody chaos. Much of Podhoretz&apos;s book reads like the heartfelt cry of a lonely man who feels increasingly abandoned by pretty much everyone. For not only are the hard left anti-Americans and the hard right isolationists undermining Bush&apos;s noble mission, but as Podhoretz describes it, the cause is opposed by conservative &quot;realists,&quot; because they are coldhearted anti-idealists, by Democrats, because they are antiwar, and by &quot;liberal internationalists,&quot; because they trust international institutions more than American power. Only George Bush and those unconditionally loyal to him are still on board. What&apos;s more, for Podhoretz they are the only source of truth.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/09/books/review/Beinart-t.html&quot;&gt;Peter Beinart&lt;/a&gt; reviews Podhoretz and Ledeen in the New York Times.

More sympathetic reviews by &lt;a href=&quot;http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2VlZjRjYzRlYTllNDA2YzY2ZTFhOWUyNDU4NjA0ZTU=&quot;&gt;William Buckley Jr.&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://pajamasmedia.com/2007/09/world_war_iv_with_the_wrong_ro.php&quot;&gt;Roger Simon&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64812</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:37:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>authoritarianism</category>
		<category>IanBuruma</category>
		<category>neoconservatism</category>
		<category>NormanPodhoretz</category>
		<dc:creator>russilwvong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


