<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with IntellectualProperty and copyright</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/IntellectualProperty+copyright</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'IntellectualProperty' and 'copyright' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:51:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:51:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Can&apos;t pirate, the IP Czar will eat me</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75654/Cant%2Dpirate%2Dthe%2DIP%2DCzar%2Dwill%2Deat%2Dme</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN03325:@@@L&amp;amp;summ2=m&amp;amp;"&gt;The Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO-IP) Act&lt;/a&gt; has added a whole other dimension to the term &quot;copyright infringement.&quot;  Sponsored by the US entertainment industry, it allows seizure of assets &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; the accused is found guilty and the creation of a new executive branch led by an &quot;Intellectual Property Czar&quot; who would report directly to the President on IP crimes--similar to the Drug Czar of the War on Drugs.  Financial penalties for copyright crimes have increased dramatically.  More information &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95702932&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and a summary of critiques &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080205-white-paper-pro-ip-acts-damage-increases-are-dangerous.html&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;  Is this a useful addition to the War On Copyright Infringement or just more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95697760&quot;&gt;bureaucratic red tape&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75654</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightinfringement</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>ipczar</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>schroedinger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>War on Drugs, War on Terror, War on Leaks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67861/War%2Don%2DDrugs%2DWar%2Don%2DTerror%2DWar%2Don%2DLeaks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/42391/"&gt;Steal this album.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;In the dying days of the music business as we once knew it, record labels are waging war on leaks&#8212;only to discover that many of the saboteurs come from within the industry itself.&quot; It&apos;s easy to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/oink_admin_arrested.php&quot;&gt;arrest a geek&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jammie_Thomas&quot;&gt;lay draconian fines on a single mom;&lt;/a&gt; what happens when their witchhunt leads to their own offices? Animal Collective won&apos;t always be around to &lt;a href=&quot;http://shamelesscomplacency.wordpress.com/category/panda-bear/&quot;&gt;get the culprits off the hook&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.67861</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:55:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<dc:creator>Coherence Panda</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The problem with music, redux.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58347/The%2Dproblem%2Dwith%2Dmusic%2Dredux</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html&quot;&gt;While Courtney&lt;/a&gt; pulled an &lt;a href=&quot;http://negativland.com/albini.html&quot;&gt;Albini&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/culture/1,65688-0.html&quot;&gt;Jeff handed out the bread&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prosoundweb.com/recording/commentary/ck/exc.php&quot;&gt;Are the peasants acting like emperors&lt;/a&gt;, or do they still want something &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.negativland.com/minidis.html&quot;&gt;shiny, aluminum, plastic, and digital&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janisian.com/article-internet_debacle.html&quot;&gt;Debacle&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/July-August-2003/feature_zittrain_julaug03.msp&quot;&gt;cage&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woodpecker.com/writing/essays/royalty-politics.html&quot;&gt;something&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/columns/medialife/6099/&quot;&gt;got&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasfed.org/news/research/2004/04it_anderson.pdf&quot;&gt;give&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(pdf)&lt;/small&gt;. Alternatively, you can just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Sep02/articles/diylabel.asp&quot;&gt;roll your own&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58347</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:16:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>albini</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>artisnotaloafofbread</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightlaw</category>
		<category>courtneylove</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>hole</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>jefftweedy</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>longtail</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>negativland</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>soundonsound</category>
		<category>stevealbini</category>
		<category>thelongtail</category>
		<category>wilco</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>When art is outlawed, only criminals will have brushes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55805/When%2Dart%2Dis%2Doutlawed%2Donly%2Dcriminals%2Dwill%2Dhave%2Dbrushes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.illegal-art.org/index.html"&gt;Illegal Art:&lt;/a&gt; Should artists &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illegal-art.org/articles/index.html&quot;&gt;be allowed&lt;/a&gt; to use copyrighted materials? Where do the First Amendment and &quot;intellectual property&quot; law collide? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.silenttheft.com/intro.htm&quot;&gt;What is art&apos;s future&lt;/a&gt; if the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uslaw.com/library/article/TNPCommercialCol071900.html&quot;&gt;current laws&lt;/a&gt; are allowed to stand?  Questions asked by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stayfreemagazine.org/&quot;&gt;Stay Free!&lt;/a&gt; in their ongoing multimedia exhibit.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55805</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:51:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>illegal</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pink-collar crime</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53562/Pinkcollar%2Dcrime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P!nk"&gt;P!nk,&lt;/a&gt; aka Alecia Moore, aka the hip new face of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illicit.co.nz/news.htm&quot;&gt;copyright infringement&lt;/a&gt;. P!nk&#8217;s latest video, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsYdtP4-5EU&amp;search=pink%20u%20%2B%20ur%20hand&quot;&gt;U + Ur Hand&lt;/a&gt;, [youtube] blatantly appropriates characters created by late New Zealand artist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illicit.co.nz/martinemond/&quot;&gt;Martin Emond&lt;/a&gt; [possibly NSFW]. No permission was sought or granted, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illicit.co.nz/&quot;&gt;Illicit Clothing&lt;/a&gt;, which manage&#8217;s Emond&#8217;s estate, do not feel they have sufficient resources to sue Sony BMG. Nevertheless, they and Emond&#8217;s fans are justifiably &lt;a href=&quot;http://badtaste.deviantart.com/journal/9573157/&quot;&gt;livid&lt;/a&gt;. It is highly unlikely that Emond, who took his own life in 2004, and whose musical tastes went in a very &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danzig_%28band%29&quot;&gt;different direction&lt;/a&gt;, would have felt any different.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53562</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:20:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>pink</category>
		<dc:creator>Soulfather</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gracenote.com announces legal lyrics downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53018/Gracenotecom%2Dannounces%2Dlegal%2Dlyrics%2Ddownloads</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/14/BUG1MJUJOT29.DTL"&gt;An end to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissthisguy.com/&quot;&gt;mondegreens?&lt;/a&gt; It looks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gracenote.com/&quot;&gt;Gracenote&lt;/a&gt;, the company behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mp3-converter.com/faq/cddb.htm&quot;&gt;CDDB&lt;/a&gt; (CD database), is looking to enhance your music-listening experience by providing an expansive and &quot;legitimate&quot; lyrics database &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betanews.com/article/Gracenote_Inks_Deal_to_Offer_Lyrics/1152903017&quot;&gt;in association with major on-line digital music providers&lt;/a&gt;. Will this be the end of the road for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mredkj.com/other/lyrics-illegal2.html&quot;&gt;existing lyrics sites&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53018</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:39:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>gracenote</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>lyrics</category>
		<category>lyricswebsites</category>
		<dc:creator>persona non grata</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Time to Panic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51409/Time%2Dto%2DPanic</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.panic.com/extras/ripoff/"&gt;Panic&lt;/a&gt; -- makers of &quot;Shockingly Good Mac Software&quot; and visually appealing marketing collateral (including their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panic.com&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;) -- have documented the various places their branding has been &lt;strike&gt;honored&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strike&gt;flatteringly borrowed&lt;/strike&gt; ripped-off on the internets. My favorite is the site selling one of their original icons for $199, promising &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panic.com/extras/ripoff/images/ripoffs/rip17-full.jpg&quot;&gt;exclusive ownership&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Is imitation really the sincerest form of flattery?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51409</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 08:37:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>panic</category>
		<category>ripoff</category>
		<dc:creator>pmbuko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Free to stitch, free to bitch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48523/Free%2Dto%2Dstitch%2Dfree%2Dto%2Dbitch</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/41869"&gt;As a followup&lt;/a&gt; to this post about Sew Fast, Sew Easy&apos;s cease and desist orders for using the phrase &quot;Stitch and Bitch&quot; et.al. to a variety of merchants, Yahoo groups, and knitting groups, it seems that a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freetostitchfreetobitch.org/&quot;&gt;boycott&lt;/a&gt; movement is gaining momentum.  They also have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cafepress.com/saynotosfse/&quot;&gt;CafePress store&lt;/a&gt; to support the cause.  Additionally, I think SFSE may have underestimated the enormous growth in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ringsurf.com/netring?ring=knittingblogs;action=list&quot;&gt;knitting blogs&lt;/a&gt; and how &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.knit1crochet2.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;quickly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://youknitwhat.blogspot.com/2006/01/stirring-shit-up.html&quot;&gt;they&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.43things.com/people/progress/Elabeth/374585&quot;&gt;band&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://neoknits.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;together&lt;/a&gt; when given a cause.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48523</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:17:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>knitting</category>
		<category>sfse</category>
		<category>stitchnbitch</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<dc:creator>like_neon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46932/Intellectual%2DProperty%2DProtection%2DAct%2Dof%2D2005</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.technologynewsdaily.com/node/1763"&gt;Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2005.&lt;/a&gt; In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/speeches/2005/ag_speech_051110.html&quot;&gt;speech&lt;/a&gt; given on November 10th, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales introduced &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/law_librarian_blog/files/ipprotectionact05.pdf&quot;&gt;proposed legislation&lt;/a&gt; [pdf] that would go one step further in criminalizing copyright infringement. The RIAA thinks its a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.riaa.com/news/newsletter/111005.asp&quot;&gt;good idea&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46932</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:47:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightinfringement</category>
		<category>criminallaw</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<dc:creator>ND&#xa2;</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Russians going after allofmp3.com?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39854/Russians%2Dgoing%2Dafter%2Dallofmp3com</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/15050&quot;&gt;After&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/37972&quot;&gt;much&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/5381&quot;&gt;discussion&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/4183&quot;&gt;about legality&lt;/a&gt;, within thirty days we will know if &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ifpi.org/site-content/press/20050222.html&quot;&gt;Russian authorities are going to bring criminal charges&lt;/a&gt; against Allofmp3.com for large-scale copyright infringement.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39854</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:52:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>allofmp3.com</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Marvel Battles Role Players</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37007/Marvel%2DBattles%2DRole%2DPlayers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/games/0,2101,65722,00.html"&gt;Marvel Comics sues NCsoft and Cryptic Studios,&lt;/a&gt; the makers of the online game &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cityofheroes.com/&quot;&gt;City of Heroes&lt;/a&gt; for player created content they feel infringes on their copyright.  If Marvel wins the case, all game developers can expect to be held responsible for the behavior of their players.  This case covers similar ground to the proposed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,65255,00.html&quot;&gt;Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act&lt;/a&gt;, which is before a Senate Judiciary Committee.  Introduced to crack down on illegal file sharing on peer-to-peer networks, the bill would hold technology companies liable for manufacturing products that encourage people to infringe copyrights. The language of the bill &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,64297,00.html&quot;&gt;caused an uproar&lt;/a&gt; among technology and consumer advocates who claimed it would kill innovation.  If successful in their lawsuit, would Marvel be able to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbspot.com/News/2004/11/marvel_sues.html&quot;&gt;sue the makers of pens and pencils&lt;/a&gt; for producing products that allow people to create pictures of copyrighted characters?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37007</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:54:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cityofheroes</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>crypticstudios</category>
		<category>induceact</category>
		<category>inducinginfringementofcopyrightsact</category>
		<category>infringement</category>
		<category>innovation</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>marvel</category>
		<category>marvelcomics</category>
		<category>ncsoft</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>peertopeer</category>
		<category>satiricalretor</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<dc:creator>Stuart_R</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ryan Malcolm knows what&apos;s up.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32207/Ryan%2DMalcolm%2Dknows%2Dwhats%2Dup</link>
		<description> In response to Justice Konrad von Finckenstein ruling that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.web-user.co.uk/news/48323.html&quot;&gt;file sharing was legal in Canada&lt;/a&gt; (previously discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/32146&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), Federal Heritage Minister Helene Scherrer has stated that &lt;i&gt;&quot;As minister of Canadian Heritage, I will, as quickly as possible, make changes to our copyright law&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The problem is that Canadian copyright law has been going through a slow and thoughtful reformation process. Since the unveiling of &lt;a href=&quot;http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/incrp-prda.nsf/en/rp01101e.html&quot;&gt;A Framework for Copyright Reform&lt;/a&gt; in 2001, a lot of progress has been made in updating the laws to reflect the needs and concerns of content producers, and the public domain.

Now, however, it seems that all of this work may be bulldozed by Helene Scherrer, who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/EdmontonSun/News/2004/04/03/407037.html&quot;&gt;declared her intentions&lt;/a&gt; at the Juno Awards last night.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32207</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:36:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<dc:creator>Jairus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Artists Rights Coalition</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22890/Artists%2DRights%2DCoalition</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://artistrightscoalition.com&quot;&gt;Artists Rights Coalition&lt;/a&gt; has decided that it is their mission to enforce copyright law. It doesn&apos;t matter whether or not it&apos;s &lt;strong&gt;their&lt;/strong&gt; copyright -- they&apos;re gonna enforce it anyway. An example of the community policing itself or of online vigilantism?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22890</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:11:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<dc:creator>cedar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Selling on ebay as a copyright infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21960/Selling%2Don%2Debay%2Das%2Da%2Dcopyright%2Dinfringement</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.knittingbeyondthehebrides.com/LAF.htm"&gt;Selling a used item as a copyright infringement?&lt;/a&gt; Used knitting patterns are often resold by the original buyer when they&apos;ve used them. &quot;Alice Starmore(R)&quot; is a company that makes patterns and yarns for knitters. Ebay is a big clearinghouse for knitters, and &quot;Alice Starmore(R)&quot; has repeatedly insisted that ANY auction of their yarns or patterns be pulled as the auctions violate their trademark and/or copyrights. So the knitters are getting a defense fund together to claim anti-trust and restraint of trade. Didn&apos;t we sort this all out over selling used books and cd&apos;s already?

You really shouldn&apos;t mess with people who have a hobby that makes them adept with big metal needles. (BTW Alice Starmore is from the Hebrides, hence the whole &quot;KnittingBeyond...&quot; business.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21960</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:40:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>ebay</category>
		<category>infringement</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<dc:creator>Salmonberry</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Conservative Judge Joins Attack on Expanding Intellectual Property Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21793/Conservative%2DJudge%2DJoins%2DAttack%2Don%2DExpanding%2DIntellectual%2DProperty%2DRights</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1023-966595.html"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Left Gets Nod from Right on Copyright Law&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;/a&gt;   A darling of the conservative movement, federal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/posner-r/&quot;&gt;Judge Richard Posner&lt;/a&gt; criticizes the Sonny Bono Act and attacks the Patent and Trademark Office for granting &quot;very questionable&quot; business method patents at a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aei.org/inv021119.htm&quot;&gt;lecture &lt;/a&gt;organized by the American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://appellateblog.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;How Appealing&lt;/a&gt;)
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21793</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:26:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanEnterpriseInstitute</category>
		<category>BrookingsInstitution</category>
		<category>BusinessMethods</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>CopyrightLaw</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>Patent</category>
		<category>PTO</category>
		<category>PublicDomain</category>
		<category>RichardPosner</category>
		<category>SonnyBonoAct</category>
		<category>USLaw</category>
		<dc:creator>ajr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>700-year-old picture of &apos;Mickey Mouse&apos; found in Austrian church</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21639/700yearold%2Dpicture%2Dof%2DMickey%2DMouse%2Dfound%2Din%2DAustrian%2Dchurch</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_709660.html"&gt;The similarity of the painting to Mickey Mouse is so astounding that the Disney concern could even lose its world-wide copyright licence.&lt;/a&gt; &#xa0; Art historian Eduard Mahlknecht believes the similarity to Mickey is pure coincidence. He told &lt;a href=&quot;http://wcm.krone.at/krone/C00/S15/A7/object_id__1555/hxcms/index.html&quot;&gt;Austrian daily Krone&lt;/a&gt; &quot;St Christopher was often depicted surrounded by various animals and sea-life, and in this case something that resembles Mickey Mouse.

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21639</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:10:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>disney</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20679/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/people/90435_people10.shtml"&gt;It&apos;s not a news link if the news is total fluff.&lt;/a&gt; For your consideration: a suit drawn on stealing the idea to REMAKE a film, then a suit drawn over who saw a SAMPLE first. The debate! Which outweighs, legal chicanery or creative bankruptcy?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20679</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 21:16:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>idea</category>
		<category>ideas</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>property</category>
		<dc:creator>damehex</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20364/</link>
		<description> Comic books, cannibalistic worms, albinos, copyright infringement, and the Blues. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abanet.org/journal/ereport/s27comic.html&quot;&gt;This story&lt;/a&gt; has it all.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20364</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:07:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>comics</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20246/</link>
		<description> Is self-regulation a legitimate approach to protecting copyright on the internet? This question is being debated at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spiked-online.com/sections/technology/debates/copyright/&quot;&gt;Spiked online&lt;/a&gt; which has commissioned responses from a variety of sources and also welcomes comments from readers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20246</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:57:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20193/</link>
		<description> Ever wonder who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20020919.html&quot;&gt;collects information&lt;/a&gt; on DMCA violations?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20193</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:02:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>dmca</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19345/</link>
		<description> The copyright cops are &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954591.html&quot;&gt;lacing up their boots&lt;/a&gt; and plan on making an example out of you.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19345</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:39:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18401/</link>
		<description> More &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1023-943134.html&quot;&gt;attempted monkeying&lt;/a&gt; with the Copyright Act. This proposal by two House legislators one would limit backup copies, while another section would let webcasters off the hook for cached copies. This seems fairly transparent considering now that the webcasting rates &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copyright.gov/carp/webcasting_rates_final.html&quot;&gt;have been set&lt;/a&gt; webcasting may end up in the hands of the larger corporations. Coincidence? I think not.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18401</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 06:54:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15380/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/721268.asp"&gt;Microsoft must include Java with XP and IE.&lt;/a&gt; Sun sues Microsoft for including Java, then sues Microsoft for not including Java.  Fascinating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15380</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2002 11:06:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>Java</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Sun</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>milnak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6936/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.glish.com/archive.asp?file=2001_04_08_archive.xml#3131146"&gt;This link is copyright, Eric Costello... &lt;/a&gt; aka &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glish.com&quot;&gt;Glish&lt;/a&gt;. No, really, he&apos;s serious. Is this really necessary? Comments?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6936</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:26:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>EricCostello</category>
		<category>Glish</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>links</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>silusGROK</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6017/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/nm/20010224/sp/imdf24022001124804a.html"&gt;There is no more heartfelt memorial&lt;/a&gt; than a big car decal with conspicuous &#xae; and &#xa9; symbols on it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6017</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2001 07:36:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>daleearnhardt</category>
		<category>decals</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>memorials</category>
		<category>nascar</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<dc:creator>tregoweth</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


