<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with IntellectualProperty and law</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/IntellectualProperty+law</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'IntellectualProperty' and 'law' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:14:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:14:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Who owns The Man?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84156/Who%2Downs%2DThe%2DMan</link>
		<description> The Electronic Frontier Foundation has published a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/08/snatching-rights-playa&quot;&gt;criticism&lt;/a&gt; of Burning Man, LLC&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://tickets2.burningman.com/info.php?i=2386&quot;&gt;Terms and Conditions&lt;/a&gt;, saying that the automatic rights assignment to BMOrg for photos &amp;amp; video taken during the event is &quot;creative lawyering intended to allow the BMO to use the streamlined &#8220;notice and takedown&#8221; process enshrined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to quickly remove photos from the Internet&quot; and that this is corrosive to our freedom of speech.  Burning Man &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.burningman.com/?p=4599#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=snatching-digital-rights-or-protecting-our-culture-burning-man-and-the-eff&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84156</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:14:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>burningman</category>
		<category>eff</category>
		<category>firstamendment</category>
		<category>freedomofspeech</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<dc:creator>scalefree</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Girl fight</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71387/Girl%2Dfight</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barbie.com/&quot;&gt;Barbie&lt;/a&gt; vs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bratz.com &quot;&gt;Bratz&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/05/usa&quot;&gt;Mattel sues MGA&lt;/a&gt;, claiming the Bratz designs were created by a Mattel employee and smuggled to its rival.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71387</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:55:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Barbie</category>
		<category>Bratz</category>
		<category>dolls</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>toys</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Boy Howdy, what a mess</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67084/Boy%2DHowdy%2Dwhat%2Da%2Dmess</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/new-creem-retrospective-outrages-magazines-alums"&gt;You&apos;d think news of a Creem Magazine retrospective book would be greeted with cries of glee.&lt;/a&gt; You&apos;d be wrong. Occasional staff shutterbug Bob Matheu licensed rights to use the name of the beloved, iconoclastic Detroit rock zine years after it ceased to be relevant, but despite occasional &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freewilliamsburg.com/may_2003/creem.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Creem is back&quot;&lt;/a&gt; announcements, only produced a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.creemmagazine.com/index1.php&quot;&gt;website.&lt;/a&gt; But now a Creem &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0061374563/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;book&lt;/a&gt; is on the stands, and surviving &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.observer.com/2007/no-rock-love-gents-try-creem-each-other#comments&quot;&gt;contributors&lt;/a&gt; like Dave Marsh, Sue Whitall, Jaan Uhelszki and publisher&apos;s widow Connie Kramer are none too pleased with the contents. Even less happy, the guys who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scribd.com/doc/500259/complaint1&quot;&gt;invested&lt;/a&gt; most of the money needed to re-secure the rights. But a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.observer.com/2007/no-rock-love-gents-try-creem-each-other&quot;&gt;dust up&lt;/a&gt; at a book signing? Lester would approve. More discussion &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.velvetrope.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&amp;Number=459303&amp;page=1#Post459303&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67084</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:12:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>creem</category>
		<category>criticism</category>
		<category>detroit</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>magazine</category>
		<category>publishing</category>
		<category>robertmatheu</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<category>zine</category>
		<dc:creator>Scram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The problem with music, redux.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58347/The%2Dproblem%2Dwith%2Dmusic%2Dredux</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html&quot;&gt;While Courtney&lt;/a&gt; pulled an &lt;a href=&quot;http://negativland.com/albini.html&quot;&gt;Albini&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/culture/1,65688-0.html&quot;&gt;Jeff handed out the bread&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prosoundweb.com/recording/commentary/ck/exc.php&quot;&gt;Are the peasants acting like emperors&lt;/a&gt;, or do they still want something &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.negativland.com/minidis.html&quot;&gt;shiny, aluminum, plastic, and digital&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janisian.com/article-internet_debacle.html&quot;&gt;Debacle&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/July-August-2003/feature_zittrain_julaug03.msp&quot;&gt;cage&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woodpecker.com/writing/essays/royalty-politics.html&quot;&gt;something&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/columns/medialife/6099/&quot;&gt;got&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasfed.org/news/research/2004/04it_anderson.pdf&quot;&gt;give&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(pdf)&lt;/small&gt;. Alternatively, you can just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Sep02/articles/diylabel.asp&quot;&gt;roll your own&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58347</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:16:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>albini</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>artisnotaloafofbread</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightlaw</category>
		<category>courtneylove</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>hole</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>jefftweedy</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>longtail</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>negativland</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>soundonsound</category>
		<category>stevealbini</category>
		<category>thelongtail</category>
		<category>wilco</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>RIAA+litigation=bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35860/RIAAlitigationbankruptcy</link>
		<description> Being threatened with litigation by the RIAA? There&apos;s always &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/E4C3B28FB081CED286256F1C00177CE3?OpenDocument&amp;Headline=Some+accused+of+music+downloading+turn+to+bankruptcy+&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; solution.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35860</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:39:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<dc:creator>anathema</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ryan Malcolm knows what&apos;s up.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32207/Ryan%2DMalcolm%2Dknows%2Dwhats%2Dup</link>
		<description> In response to Justice Konrad von Finckenstein ruling that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.web-user.co.uk/news/48323.html&quot;&gt;file sharing was legal in Canada&lt;/a&gt; (previously discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/32146&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), Federal Heritage Minister Helene Scherrer has stated that &lt;i&gt;&quot;As minister of Canadian Heritage, I will, as quickly as possible, make changes to our copyright law&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The problem is that Canadian copyright law has been going through a slow and thoughtful reformation process. Since the unveiling of &lt;a href=&quot;http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/incrp-prda.nsf/en/rp01101e.html&quot;&gt;A Framework for Copyright Reform&lt;/a&gt; in 2001, a lot of progress has been made in updating the laws to reflect the needs and concerns of content producers, and the public domain.

Now, however, it seems that all of this work may be bulldozed by Helene Scherrer, who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/EdmontonSun/News/2004/04/03/407037.html&quot;&gt;declared her intentions&lt;/a&gt; at the Juno Awards last night.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32207</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:36:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<dc:creator>Jairus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2223/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=law/View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=ZZZF5AYTO9C&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;cst=1&amp;amp;pc=3&amp;amp;pa=0&amp;amp;s=News&amp;amp;ExpIgnore=true&amp;amp;showsummary=0"&gt;This story is *actually* about Lexis,&lt;/a&gt; who got their case file in the first place by stealing it from West, suing Jurisline, who in turn bought their CD&apos;s and mounted them on a free website, and winning.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Lawyers, in particular, may find this one interesting...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2223</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:59:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>jurisline</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lexis</category>
		<category>lexisnexis</category>
		<category>west</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1773/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cnn.com/LAW/columns/dual.metallica.05.19/"&gt;An interview&lt;/a&gt;  with the lawyers from Napster and Metellica. Good points, both.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1773</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2000 10:30:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>IntellectualProperty</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Metallica</category>
		<category>MP3s</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>Napster</category>
		<category>P2P</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>USlaw</category>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


