<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with InternationalRelations and war</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/InternationalRelations+war</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'InternationalRelations' and 'war' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:08:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:08:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Annexing Khuzestan -</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49301/Annexing%2DKhuzestan</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gnn.tv/headlines/7365/Annexing_Khuzestan_Battle_Plans_for_Iran"&gt;Battle plans for Iran...&lt;/a&gt; resonates with the sad ring of real possibility.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49301</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:08:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>internationalrelations</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Khuzestan</category>
		<category>speculation</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Muirwylde</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>U.S loses faith in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24724/US%2Dloses%2Dfaith%2Din%2DCanada</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/search/site/story.asp?id=2B543682-C0F2-4105-B7FD-A98AC7035C95"&gt;U.S. loses faith in Canada&lt;/a&gt; &quot;We would be there for Canada, part of our family. And that is why so many in the United States are disappointed and upset that Canada is not fully supporting us now,&quot; says Paul Cellucci, U.S. ambassador to Canada. As pro-US sentiments from prominent Canadian figures are harshly criticized while blatant (and rather tasteless) anti-US remarks go more or less ignored by the government, has the relationship with our longtime friends up north been irreversibly soured?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24724</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2003 23:41:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ambassador</category>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>foreignrelations</category>
		<category>internationalrelations</category>
		<category>paulcellucci</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usambassador</category>
		<category>uscanadarelations</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>swank6</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Israel to conduct killings in the us</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22862/Israel%2Dto%2Dconduct%2Dkillings%2Din%2Dthe%2Dus</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030115-035849-6156r"&gt;From UPI: &lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Israel is embarking upon a more aggressive approach to the war on terror that will include staging targeted killings in the United States and other friendly countries, former Israeli intelligence officials told &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030115-035849-6156r&quot;&gt;United Press International&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;  I am so NOT trolling.  I am simply curious to see what MeFi users have to say about this interesting news item.    </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22862</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:49:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internationalrelations</category>
		<category>Israel</category>
		<category>killings</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>UnitedPressInternational</category>
		<category>UPI</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>pejamo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10850/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.berkshireeagle.com/default.asp?puid=2182&amp;amp;spuid=2182&amp;amp;indx=1108060&amp;amp;article=on"&gt;Love Bomb!&lt;/a&gt; Finally, a creative idea for the &quot;New War.&quot;  Granted, it wouldn&apos;t solve the whole mess, but it might be a step in the right direction.  It sure wouldn&apos;t make us any new enemies.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;A panel of four Williams College professors urged restraint in the so-called war on terrorism Monday, with one of them calling upon America to bomb Afghanistan not with explosives but with food and medical supplies.
Anthropology professor David Edwards, speaking during a public forum at Chapin Hall, said airlifts similar to those provided to West Berlin by the United States and Britain in 1948 and 1949 could prove a public relations coup and an unexpected blow to terrorist Osama bin Ladin, in a country wracked by starvation, civil war and oppression.
&quot;Bin Laden expects us to strike with military force. It&apos;s what he&apos;s prepared for. In dealing with terrorism, you have to do the unexpected,&quot; said Edwards, an expert on Afghanistan who was joined on the panel by political science professors Marc Lynch, Gary Jacobsohn and James McAllister.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10850</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:54:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>aid</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>humanitarian</category>
		<category>InternationalRelations</category>
		<category>psyops</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WarOnTerror</category>
		<dc:creator>martk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6265/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/12817.html"&gt;Bush decides he doesn&apos;t want peace.&lt;/a&gt; resident bush has made it clear to the president of south korea that he will be reversing the previous administration&apos;s policy toward north korea.  so the strides of peace that have been made can easily be wiped away now.  i especially like the reversal of colin powell&apos;s comments from the day before.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6265</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 07:07:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>IHT</category>
		<category>InternationalHeraldTribune</category>
		<category>internationalrelations</category>
		<category>Korea</category>
		<category>NorthKorea</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>SouthKorea</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>bliss322</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


