<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Internet and business</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Internet+business</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Internet' and 'business' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:45:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:45:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Google Asks: &quot;What Would Email Look Like, If It Were Invented Today?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85513/Google%2DAsks%2DWhat%2DWould%2DEmail%2DLook%2DLike%2DIf%2DIt%2DWere%2DInvented%2DToday</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sci-tech-today.com/news/Google-Wave-Will-Invite-Previewers/story.xhtml?story_id=13100G0FT467"&gt;Google began inviting&lt;/a&gt; volunteers to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/29/google-wave-starts-rolling-picks-up-over-100000-new-riders/&quot;&gt;public preview test&lt;/a&gt; of their new &lt;a href=&quot;http://wave.google.com/help/wave/about.html&quot;&gt;Wave&lt;/a&gt; web-based collaborative email and document communications platform yesterday, which enables users to &quot;communicate and work together in real time.&quot; Initial &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crunchbase.com/product/google-wave&quot;&gt;reviews&lt;/a&gt; this &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-wave.html&quot;&gt;past May&lt;/a&gt; seemed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/28/google-wave-drips-with-ambition-can-it-fulfill-googles-grand-web-vision/&quot;&gt;positive&lt;/a&gt;.  (&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/82010/Google-Wave-the-next-big-thing-or-a-wash&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;) Features include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ykZYKCK7AM&quot;&gt;real-time collaboration&lt;/a&gt;, (including concurrent editing and control of each &quot;wave&quot; thread,) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sx3Fpw0XCXk&quot;&gt;natural language tools&lt;/a&gt; and a variety of &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/wave/&quot;&gt;APIs&lt;/a&gt; which users can use to embed content in other sites. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_UyVmITiYQ&quot;&gt;Google Wave Developer Preview at Google I/O 2009&lt;/a&gt; (80min video -- an abridged 10 minute version is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Itc4253kjhw&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Wave login page is &lt;a href=&quot;http://wave.google.com/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waveprotocol.org/Home&quot;&gt;Google Wave Federation Protocol&lt;/a&gt; is an open source project for developers. 

The WSJ reports that invites are now &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/10/01/google-wave-invites-for-sale-on-ebay/&quot;&gt;for sale on EBay&lt;/a&gt;.  Something similar happened when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2004/06/63786&quot;&gt; Google launched GMail&lt;/a&gt; in 2004. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85513</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:45:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>api</category>
		<category>beta</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>collaboration</category>
		<category>communication</category>
		<category>developer</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>gmail</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>html5</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>socialmedia</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>testing</category>
		<category>wave</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>web20</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Jerry&apos;s Guide to the World Wide Web</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76640/Jerrys%2DGuide%2Dto%2Dthe%2DWorld%2DWide%2DWeb</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/technology/companies/18yahoo.html?partner=rss&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;Jerry Yang, founder and CEO of Yahoo, has stepped down.&lt;/a&gt; He recently turned down a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-01CorpNewsPR.mspx&quot;&gt;$31 a share offer from Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;, and with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/feb/01/microsoft.technology&quot;&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt; shares hovering around $10, some say &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/3242531/Yahoo-chief-Yang-could-be-forced-out-says-top-analyst.html&quot;&gt;he was forced out&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76640</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:48:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>plexi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Internet is a Copy Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69637/The%2DInternet%2Dis%2Da%2DCopy%2DMachine</link>
		<description> &quot;When copies are free, you need to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/01/better_than_fre.php&quot;&gt;sell things which cannot be copied&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Kevin Kelly (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/67800/True-Films&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) describes eight &quot;generative&quot; values that increase in value as the price tag on making copies goes down. He also has some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/03/1000_true_fans.php&quot;&gt;advice&lt;/a&gt; for creators who want to make money off &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail&quot;&gt;the long tail&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://jonathancoulton.com/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69637</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:51:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>copying</category>
		<category>fans</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>kevinkelly</category>
		<category>longtail</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>technium</category>
		<dc:creator>ErWenn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No, you got Google in my peanut butter!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56268/No%2Dyou%2Dgot%2DGoogle%2Din%2Dmy%2Dpeanut%2Dbutter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2006/tc20061113_630705.htm?rcampaign_id=bier_tcv.g3a.rssm1113n"&gt;You got chocolate in my Google!&lt;/a&gt; How do you make websites better?  Simple.  Like Peanut Butter Cups, you just take two things that rock and mash them together.  It&apos;s cheap, effective...and really gaining steam.  Here&apos;s &lt;a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2006/tc20061113_459957.htm?campaign_id=bier_tcv.g3a.rssm1113o&gt;one example&lt;/a&gt;, along with &lt;a href=http://www.ProgrammableWeb.com&gt;a list of a ton of others&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56268</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:49:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>mashing</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>PreacherTom</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Friendster : Wallflower at the Web Party</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55546/Friendster%2DWallflower%2Dat%2Dthe%2DWeb%2DParty</link>
		<description> Friendster : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/15/business/yourmoney/15friend.html&quot;&gt;Wallflower at the Web Party&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55546</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:45:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>friendster</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>socialnetworking</category>
		<category>socialnetworks</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>Afroblanco</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Net neutrality: Meet the winner</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52268/Net%2Dneutrality%2DMeet%2Dthe%2Dwinner</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2008-1028_3-6082444.html"&gt;Net neutrality: Meet the winner&lt;/a&gt; As Verizon Communications&apos; executive vice president for public affairs, policy and communications, Tauke has spent the last few months embroiled in a fiery debate over Net neutrality, the concept that broadband providers must be legally required to treat all content equally.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52268</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:07:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>computing</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>lobbies</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>iKarma</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51200/iKarma</link>
		<description> I can&apos;t work out if &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ikarma.com&quot;&gt;iKarma&lt;/a&gt;
is a well-intentioned stab at applying the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2006/03/what_do_we_do_with_social_media.shtml&quot;&gt;power
of social software&lt;/a&gt; to the world of business, or simply a
well-intentioned scrape at the bottom of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://static.flickr.com/8/8032325_9837368a4b_b.jpg&quot;&gt;Web
2.0 barrel.
&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51200</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:41:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>socialsoftware</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>web2.0</category>
		<dc:creator>Jofus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The future of MS, Apple, and Google</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41984/The%2Dfuture%2Dof%2DMS%2DApple%2Dand%2DGoogle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20050512.html"&gt;The future of Google, Apple, and Microsoft.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41984</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 19:13:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>ms</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>Tlogmer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Great Googly Moogly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39108/Great%2DGoogly%2DMoogly</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.techwhack.com/700/google-firefox/"&gt;Forget about P&amp;G and Gilette, how &apos;bout Google &amp; Firefox?&lt;/a&gt; Is Google developing their own browser?  They appear to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=59100216&quot;&gt;hiring&lt;/a&gt; Firefox developers.  Can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=1274&quot;&gt;Googzilla&lt;/a&gt; be far behind?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39108</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>firefox</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>merger</category>
		<category>search_engine</category>
		<dc:creator>fixedgear</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hey Mama.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32804/Hey%2DMama</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/"&gt;Apple iTunes 4.5&lt;/a&gt; was released yesterday, bringing with it several nice new features, such as a live-updating &quot;Party Shuffle&quot; playlist &amp;mdash; as well as not-so-nice features like attaching Music Store links to every artist and album in your library (I turned this off immediately). As for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/&quot; title=&quot;Apple - iTunes - Music Store&quot;&gt;iTunes Music Store&lt;/a&gt; itself, Apple has integrated its QuickTime features of music videos and movie trailers (this is related to music how?), shopper-created &quot;iMixes&quot; and for this month, a new &quot;Free Track of the Day,&quot; a questionable asset being that today&apos;s artist is &lt;a href=&quot;http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?playlistId=7025725&quot; title=&quot;Take Her Away ...Please!&quot;&gt;Avril Lavigne&lt;/a&gt;. ...Perhaps you&apos;d rather have an &lt;a href=&quot;http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?playlistId=2356483&quot; title=&quot;The Meowstro Sings Guster&apos;s &apos;Keep It Together&apos;&quot;&gt;album sung entirely with &quot;meows&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32804</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:39:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apple</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>iTunes</category>
		<category>iTunesMusicStore</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<dc:creator>Down10</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Biz Stratergy MS uses</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27141/Biz%2DStratergy%2DMS%2Duses</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2085668/"&gt;Google: the God that failed?&lt;/a&gt; is the title of the article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/&quot;&gt;MSN Slate&lt;/a&gt;. All of us know Microsoft is working on a new search engine technology. Till date everyone considers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; to be &lt;em&gt;the Guru&lt;/em&gt;. MS obviously doesn&apos;t like that, so what it is doing? Well, the same thing it always does - to survive competition, eliminate it.
The reasons being given by the article are pretty silly and more aimed at &apos;faming down&apos; Google.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27141</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:17:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>engine</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>jayantk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Are you ready?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23006/Are%2Dyou%2Dready</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pir.org"&gt;On Saturday&lt;/a&gt; owners of .org domains will have a new registry, the Public Interest Registry.  After winning the .org registry away from Verisign, PIR (a creation of the Internet Society (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isoc.org/&quot;&gt;ISOC&lt;/a&gt;)) promises to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pir.org/about.html&quot;&gt;more responsive to the non-commercial needs &lt;/a&gt;of Internet users, which is ostensibly what the .org is all about.  Info from ISOC on the bid and other related items &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/bidbackground.shtml&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, some grumbling about ISOC&apos;s methods by the losing bidders &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/1481441&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Will .org return to its roots with this change, or business as usual?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23006</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:47:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.org</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>DNS</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>InternetSociety</category>
		<category>ISOC</category>
		<category>PIR</category>
		<category>PublicInterestRegisty</category>
		<category>registry</category>
		<dc:creator>WolfDaddy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15979/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com:PK%20Interactive%20Receives%20Funding%20from%20idealab@216.150.6.36/Yahoo!%20News%20-%20PK%20Interactive%20receives%20funding%20from%20idealab.htm"&gt;PK Interactive receives funding from idealab&lt;/a&gt; According to the article on Yahoo News, &quot;New York&apos;s PK Interactive, best known as the owner and publisher of popular &quot;dot-com deadpool&quot; site, F---edcompany.com, has received $18 million in private funding from idealab and its existing investors, Chase Capital Partners, Flatiron Partners and TechFund Capital.&quot;

Sort of a strange turn of events, no?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15979</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 05:46:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>capital</category>
		<category>fuckedcompany</category>
		<category>idealab</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>pkinteractive</category>
		<dc:creator>ph00dz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13231/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://americanpressinstitute.org/news.cfm?id=523"&gt;What is the future of online news. &lt;/a&gt; Will subscription eventually win through? Is there a viable business model that will allow independent publishers (such as Salon) to survive, or will we see further media consolidation? Where does blogging fit into this spectrum?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13231</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:24:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>impact</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>speculation</category>
		<dc:creator>RobertLoch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12997/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pub54.ezboard.com/fkalidiscussionfrm1.showMessage?topicID=12.topic"&gt;Kali.net&lt;/a&gt; (once one of the world&apos;s largest Internet gaming networks) is created. Makes money. BeTech buys Kali to impress investors. BeTech stops paying for upkeep. ISPs get peeved. No more Kali. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kali.net&quot;&gt;Or is there?&lt;/a&gt; Is this a funeral or a phoenix? And is there anything else on the &apos;Net about this? I&apos;m coming up with bupkus.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12997</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2001 09:49:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>entertainment</category>
		<category>gaming</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Kali</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9400/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2001/07/31/pucdsl.DTL"&gt;PacBell seeks to secure a monopoly&lt;/a&gt; Californians urged to contact the PUC to put the brakes on PacBell&apos;s plan to kill the independent ISP.  
Should they be allowed to take their toys and go home or be forced to share?  And, what effect will this have on the future of tech companies if PacBell is able to lock out DSL competition?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9400</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 21:06:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>DSL</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>ISPs</category>
		<category>monopoly</category>
		<category>PacBell</category>
		<dc:creator>sillygit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9393/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/IAR/article/0,,12_857291,00.html"&gt;Scient and iXL Merge&lt;/a&gt; ...and I&apos;m wondering who thinks this is a really good idea. A big part of the problem these &quot;iBusiness&quot; consultancies have is that they&apos;re too big. Remember all those layoffs? It&apos;s in large part because of big overhead, which is a big problem in a tight market. So what problem is being solved by making these two companies into one bigger company?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9393</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:48:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>iXL</category>
		<category>merger</category>
		<category>Scient</category>
		<dc:creator>peterme</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9245/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://snapshot.auerweck.com/"&gt;Snapshots of san francisco:&lt;/a&gt; one man&apos;s view of the san francisco dot-com fiz-out.  (more people should have websites, i can&apos;t get enough.)  -- flash needed  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9245</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:41:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>dotcom</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>sanfrancisco</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>tomato</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8668/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dotcomscoop.com/yahoo.html"&gt;&quot;At some point &lt;/a&gt; Yahoo! will shift emphasis towards a billing relationship, that is as good as fact. What they need to decide, however, is whether to lead with a subscription or ISP model.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8668</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:29:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>businessmodel</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>grambo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8069/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/06/05/internet.consolidation/index.html"&gt;Four sites account for half of Web surfing&lt;/a&gt; &apos;Even more significantly, the number of companies controlling 60 percent of all U.S. surfing time plummeted from 110 to 14, according to Jupiter Media Metrix, which released the survey Monday.&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8069</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2001 12:26:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>rebeccablood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7332/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20010429/tc/buffett_calls_internet_investing_quot_a_big_trap_quot__1.html"&gt;Buffett calls Internet investing &quot;a big trap&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;If only many investors would have listened to Mr. Buffett a few years ago. Today, in Omaha, Buffett said, &quot;But I think the idea that you could take any business idea and turn it into wealth on the Internet is just wrong.&quot; Common sense strikes again.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7332</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:35:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>dotcom</category>
		<category>dotcoms</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>investing</category>
		<category>investors</category>
		<category>warrenbuffet</category>
		<dc:creator>shackbar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7070/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/intl-news/article/0,,6_744511,00.html"&gt;7 Lessons Learned From The Dot-com Fallout&lt;/a&gt;  -- &quot;Some of these are so obvious it&apos;s almost too embarrassing to list them.&quot;  Indeed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7070</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:51:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>dotcom</category>
		<category>dotcombubble</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<dc:creator>shauna</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6295/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/01q1/greathack-1.html"&gt;One million credit card numbers stolen! News at 11!&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fbi.gov/pressrm/pressrel/pressrel01/nipc030801.htm&quot;&gt;FBI&lt;/a&gt; has gone public with a rather dry account of a huge organized attack on ecommerce sites, exploiting security flaws in NT which Microsoft fixed and offered patches for nearly two years ago.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6295</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:20:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>creditcards</category>
		<category>ecommerce</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>NT</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>theft</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5484/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.redherring.com/vc/2001/0124/vc-vcps012401.html"&gt;&quot;Accept our valuation or let Sand Hill put you into Chapter 11.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; This article from Red Herring on bridge financing for cash-strapped dotcoms makes the dire nature of the situation pretty explicit.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5484</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:31:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bubble</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>dotcom</category>
		<category>dotcoms</category>
		<category>financing</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>RedHerring</category>
		<category>SandHill</category>
		<dc:creator>JParker</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5327/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://yahoo.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-4511964.html?pt.yfin.cat_fin.txt.ne"&gt;Welcome to the blob. Please watch your step. &lt;/a&gt; It looks like Viacom&apos;s going to swallow up Yahoo! and all its assorted properties. What does this leave untouched, by partnerships or redistribution deals or what-have-you? Anything? (Who was it again who was predicting that one large company that controlled everything called Omnivox? I remember reading about it somewhere when I was, like, ten or so.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5327</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:56:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>monopoly</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>viacom</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>maura</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


