<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Iran and oil</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Iran+oil</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Iran' and 'oil' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:47:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:47:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Axis of ChiRan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84024/Axis%2Dof%2DChiRan</link>
		<description> Multi - polarity in Eurasia.
Pepe Escobar on Iran, China and the New Silk Road &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juancole.com/2009/08/escobar-on-iran-china-and-silk-road.html&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDhyj_Wr59Y&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Iran and China just signed a $3 bn. deal for China to help develop Iran&apos;s refinery capacity in Abadan and the Gulf. ( &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/81685/Its-Mine-No-its-Mine&quot;&gt;previous&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; )  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84024</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:47:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>China</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>PepeEscobar</category>
		<category>pipelinestan</category>
		<category>SilkRoad</category>
		<dc:creator>adamvasco</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Economist: The World in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76924/The%2DEconomist%2DThe%2DWorld%2Din%2D2009</link>
		<description> In 2009, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12574162&quot;&gt;a remarkably gifted politician, confronting a remarkably difficult set of challenges&lt;/a&gt;, will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12375981&quot;&gt;have to learn to say &quot;No we can&apos;t&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12574165&quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo will prove a moral minefield&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12574168&quot;&gt;economic recovery will be invisible to the naked eye&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494430&quot;&gt;governments must prepare for the day they stop financial guarantees&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494427&quot;&gt;we will judge our commitment to sustainability&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494436&quot;&gt;scientists should research the causes of religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12499877&quot;&gt;we will all be potential online paparazzi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494445&quot;&gt;English will have more words than any other language&lt;/a&gt; (but it&apos;s meaningless), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494516&quot;&gt;Afghanistan will see a surge of Western (read: American) troops&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494545&quot;&gt;Iran will continue its nuclear quest&lt;/a&gt; while &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494575&quot;&gt;diplomacy lies in shambles&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494593&quot;&gt;the sea floor is the new frontier&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494596&quot;&gt;we should rethink aging&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494470&quot;&gt;(non-)voters will continue to thwart the European project&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494473&quot;&gt;but cheap travel will continue to buoy it&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494503&quot;&gt;though it has some unfinished business to attend to&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494485&quot;&gt;a Nordic defence bond will blossom&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/&quot;&gt;The Economist: The World in 2009&lt;/a&gt;. Previously: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/66976/The-Economist-The-World-in-2008&quot;&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/56666/The-Economist-The-World-in-2007&quot;&gt;2007&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494578&quot;&gt;How did we do&lt;/a&gt; last time around? And what will we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494581&quot;&gt;probably be wrong about&lt;/a&gt; this time?


Guest contributions:

President of Brazil Luiz In&amp;#0225;cio Lula da Silva &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494572&quot;&gt;seeks greater international cooperation and sees a growing global role for the larger emerging economies&lt;/a&gt;.

Queen of Jordan Rania &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494560&quot;&gt;calls for education reform&lt;/a&gt;.

Prime Minister of Australia Kevin Rudd &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494537&quot;&gt;calls upon mid-size powers to be creative and effective with their influence&lt;/a&gt;.

Prime Minister of Spain Jos&amp;#0233; Luis Rodr&amp;#0237;guez Zapatero &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494491&quot;&gt;emphasizes the importance of transparency and solidarity in Europe&lt;/a&gt;.

Prime Minister of Ukraine Yulia Tymoshenko, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494497&quot;&gt;wedged between Russia and the EU, cites historical precedent&lt;/a&gt;.

Former Secretary of State of the United States, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Henry Kissinger &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12574180&quot;&gt;argues America will be less powerful, but will still be the essential nation in creating a new world order&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494497&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Mayor Boris Johnson of London &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494467&quot;&gt; argues against over-regulation&lt;/a&gt;.


Elections to watch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494563&quot;&gt;Brazil, Chile&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494470&quot;&gt;European Parliament&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494476&quot;&gt;Germany&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494534&quot;&gt;Indonesia&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494548&quot;&gt;Israel&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494528&quot;&gt;Japan&lt;/a&gt;.


Also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494494&quot;&gt;Russia will enter its first real difficult years under Putin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494452&quot;&gt;Brown might not make it&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494433&quot;&gt;we won&apos;t ban nukes but we can pretend&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494569&quot;&gt;Ontario will receive economic help from other provinces&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494531&quot;&gt;Australians will grow ever more thirsty&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/theworldin/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12494458&quot;&gt;Britain needs to make stuff again&lt;/a&gt;.


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/blogs/theworldin2009/&quot;&gt;World in 2009 blog&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76924</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:00:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2009</category>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>arctic</category>
		<category>barackobama</category>
		<category>creditcrisis</category>
		<category>creditcrunch</category>
		<category>cuba</category>
		<category>currentaffairs</category>
		<category>currentevents</category>
		<category>diplomacy</category>
		<category>economist</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>endofyear</category>
		<category>endofyearlists</category>
		<category>english</category>
		<category>eu</category>
		<category>europe</category>
		<category>europeanunion</category>
		<category>facebook</category>
		<category>financialcrisis</category>
		<category>gas</category>
		<category>guantanamo</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>lists</category>
		<category>magiceightball</category>
		<category>myspace</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>nuclearpower</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>nuke</category>
		<category>nukes</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>ocean</category>
		<category>oceanfloor</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>petrol</category>
		<category>petroleum</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>predictions</category>
		<category>presidentobama</category>
		<category>sea</category>
		<category>seabed</category>
		<category>seafloor</category>
		<category>surge</category>
		<category>sustainability</category>
		<category>sustainable</category>
		<category>theeconomist</category>
		<category>thesurge</category>
		<category>theworldin</category>
		<category>theworldin2009</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>world</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Persia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73843/Persia</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/08/iran-archaeology/del-giudice-text"&gt;Persia: Ancient Soul of Iran.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/08/iran-archaeology/iran-photography&quot;&gt;glorious&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/geopedia/Iran_Archaeology&quot;&gt;past&lt;/a&gt; inspires a conflicted nation.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73843</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:05:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Archaeology</category>
		<category>Culture</category>
		<category>CyrusTheGreat</category>
		<category>Democracy</category>
		<category>History</category>
		<category>HumanRights</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>IslamicRevolution</category>
		<category>Mossadegh</category>
		<category>Oil</category>
		<category>Persia</category>
		<category>PersianEmpire</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Religion</category>
		<category>Shah</category>
		<category>Shahnameh</category>
		<category>Shiites</category>
		<category>Theocracy</category>
		<category>Zoroastrianism</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Adding up US subsidies for auto travel with and without the costs of war</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65210/Adding%2Dup%2DUS%2Dsubsidies%2Dfor%2Dauto%2Dtravel%2Dwith%2Dand%2Dwithout%2Dthe%2Dcosts%2Dof%2Dwar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/09/20/delucchi-study-finds-that-us-motorists-do-not-pay-their-way/"&gt;In the U.S., motorists do not pay their way.&lt;/a&gt; The US government spends more on highways and other auto-related expenses than it receives from auto-related taxes, unlike almost every country in Europe. In a recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.its.ucdavis.edu/download_pdf.php?id=1088%20&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[pdf], &lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/people/faculty/delucchi/index.php&quot;&gt;Mark Delucchi&lt;/a&gt; calculates automobile-related costs and revenues in three different ways and concludes the subsidy is around 20-70 cents per gallon or $24-105 billion in 2002.  But what are automobile-related costs, you ask? Largely tucked away in footnotes and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2005/UCD-ITS-RR-96-03(07)_rev2.pdf&quot;&gt;background papers&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[pdf]&lt;/small&gt; are his careful considerations about which expenditures to include and what portion of costs relate directly to automobile oil use, for everything from the highway patrol, to fighting brushfires, to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, to military activity in the Middle East.  Don&apos;t miss Report #15, in which Delucchi and coauthor James Murphy seek to calculate: &#8220;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2004/UCD-ITS-RR-96-03(15)_rev2.pdf&quot;&gt;If the U.S. transportation sector did not use oil, how much would the U.S. federal government reduce its military commitment in the Persian Gulf?&lt;/a&gt;&#8221; &lt;small&gt;[pdf]&lt;/small&gt; (especially Table 15-12, which summarizes much of the paper). &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Iraq+oil&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;] [originally &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/27369&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65210</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:02:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>automobiles</category>
		<category>cars</category>
		<category>gasoline</category>
		<category>gastax</category>
		<category>highways</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>jamesmurphy</category>
		<category>markdelucchi</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>roads</category>
		<category>subsidies</category>
		<category>transit</category>
		<category>transportation</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>salvia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Much to do about nothing?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61248/Much%2Dto%2Ddo%2Dabout%2Dnothing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=9302"&gt;This opinion piece&lt;/a&gt; in Prospect magazine argues that perhaps the importance of the problems in the Middle East are overblown. Interesting read.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61248</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 10:31:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<dc:creator>zeoslap</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Halliburton Moves Headquarters to Dubai, UAE.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59378/Halliburton%2DMoves%2DHeadquarters%2Dto%2DDubai%2DUAE</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/halliburton-move-headquarters-dubai/story.aspx?guid=%7B71120983%2D5D06%2D416D%2D80D7%2D3B4348F8C514%7D&amp;amp;siteid=yhoo&amp;amp;dist=yhoo"&gt;Halliburton Moves Corporate Headquarters to Dubai, UAE.&lt;/a&gt; Oil services giant Halliburton, parent company of soon to be spun off KBR, and recipient of many no-bid government contracts, is moving its corporate headquarters to Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.  Meanwhile, the US and the UAE are working on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20070312:MTFH99284_2007-03-12_16-51-20_N12413708&amp;type=comktNews&amp;rpc=44&quot;&gt;free trade agreement&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mehrnews.com/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=451199&quot;&gt;The UAE and China are the two largest exporters to Iran&lt;/a&gt;, and some speculate that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/3/11/21830/4591&quot;&gt;the purpose of the move is to open up Iran as a legitimate market for Halliburton,&lt;/a&gt; because as a US firm its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.halliburton.com/news/archive/2004/report.jsp&quot;&gt;acknowledged trade with Iran&lt;/a&gt; is of questionable legality. Among the implications of this corporate move is that the US military will now be heavily dependent on a contractor that is a foreign company.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59378</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:23:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>halliburton</category>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>uae</category>
		<dc:creator>Pastabagel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Poom Time ?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51600/Poom%2DTime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1774162,00.html"&gt;Storm Warning.&lt;/a&gt; Seems like Iran has already started flexing it&apos;s economic muscles-haven&apos;t seen it reported that widely anywhere else, but these &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.middleeastforex.com/index.php?section=215&quot;&gt;two&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;null&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12759654/&quot;&gt;events&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; seem to be connected. Then again, maybe I&apos;ve been spending too much time reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itulip.com/retrospective2006.htm#from_home&quot;&gt;itulip&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51600</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 05:27:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dollar</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<dc:creator>jaksoul</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iran: &#8220;We Have The Oil, Go Fuck Yourself&#8221; America: &#8220;OK&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48479/Iran%2D%3FWe%2DHave%2DThe%2DOil%2DGo%2DFuck%2DYourself%3F%2DAmerica%2D%3FOK%3F</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/23/politics/23iran.html&quot;&gt;Iran may be trying to get nuclear weapons.&lt;/a&gt;  In the process potentially starting a new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,1864693,00.html&quot;&gt;war with Israel&lt;/a&gt;, fun times.  America on the other hand &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sabcnews.com/world/the_middle_east/0,2172,120142,00.html&quot;&gt;isn&apos;t going to do all that much &lt;/a&gt;because Iran controls a&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Oil_watch/Oil_ReservesProducConsump.html&quot;&gt; large amount of the worlds oil&lt;/a&gt;, and with prices already high, they don&apos;t want to spark another &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060119/wl_afp/irannuclearpolitics&quot;&gt;oil crisis&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48479</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:37:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iran</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>stilgar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Regarding Blood And Oil</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41194/Regarding%2DBlood%2DAnd%2DOil</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;Whereas, in the past, national power was thought to reside in the possession of a mighty arsenal and the maintenance of extended alliance systems, it is now associated with economic dynamism and the cultivation of technological innovation. To exercise leadership in the current epoch, states are expected to possess a vigorous domestic economy and to outperform other states in the development and export of high-tech goods. While a potent military establishment is still considered essential to national security, it must be balanced by a strong and vibrant economy. &apos;National security depends on successful engagement in the global economy,&apos; the Institute for National Security Studies observed in a recent Pentagon study.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanempireproject.com/bookpage.asp?ISBN=0805073132&quot; title=&quot;Since September 11 and the commencement of the &apos;war on terror,&apos; the world&apos;s attention has been focused on the relationship between U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and the oceans of crude oil that lie beneath the region&apos;s soil. Klare traces oil&apos;s impact on international affairs since World War II, revealing its influence on the Truman, Eisenhower, Nixon, and Carter doctrines. He shows how America&apos;s own wells are drying up as our demand increases; by 2010, the U.S. will need to import 60% of its oil. And since most of this supply will have to come from chronically unstable, often violently anti-American zones -- the Persian Gulf, the Caspian Sea, Latin America, and Africa -- our dependency is bound to lead to recurrent military involvement.&quot;&gt;Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America&apos;s Growing Petroleum Dependency&lt;/a&gt; by Michael T. Klare, here is an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanempireproject.com/bookexcerpt.asp?ISBN=0805073132&quot; title=&quot;Tampa, Florida, is not one of the places you usually think of as a hub for American relations with the oil kingdoms of the Persian Gulf. It does not, like Houston, play host to any of the giant US. oil companies; it does not, like Washington, D.C., house the State Department and foreign embassies; and it does not, like New York, lay claim to the United Nations and the international news media. But Tampa does have something that none of those other cities can claim: the headquarters of the U.S. Central Command (Centcom), the nerve center for all U.S. military operations in the Persian Gulf region, including those now under way in Afghanistan and Iraq. Centcom forces, operating as they do in the greater Middle East, occupy the front lines in the war against terrorism and play a critical role in efforts to prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction. From its very inception, however, Centcom&apos;s principal task has been to protect the global flow of petroleum. &quot;&gt;excerpt&lt;/a&gt; from the book and here is his most recent article--&lt;a href=&quot;http://antiwar.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=Oil+and+the+Coming+War+With+Iran+-+by+Michael+T.+Klare+and+Tom+Engelhardt&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=13880692&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.antiwar.com%2Fengelhardt%2F%3Farticleid%3D5540&amp;partnerID=16&quot; title=&quot;Before proceeding further, let me state for the record that I do not claim oil is the sole driving force behind the Bush administration&apos;s apparent determination to destroy Iranian military capabilities. No doubt there are many national security professionals in Washington who are truly worried about Iran&apos;s nuclear program, just as there were many professionals who were genuinely worried about Iraqi weapons capabilities... Because Iran occupies a strategic location on the north side of the Persian Gulf, it is in a position to threaten oil fields in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, and the United Arab Emirates, which together possess more than half of the world&apos;s known oil reserves. Iran also sits athwart the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which, daily, 40 percent of the world&apos;s oil exports pass. In addition, Iran is becoming a major supplier of oil and natural gas to China, India, and Japan, thereby giving Tehran additional clout in world affairs. It is these geopolitical dimensions of energy, as much as Iran&apos;s potential to export significant quantities of oil to the United States, that undoubtedly govern the administration&apos;s strategic calculations.&quot;&gt;Oil and the Coming War With Iran&lt;/a&gt;. Well, at least he has been consistent--consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20011105&amp;s=klare&quot; title=&quot;There are many ways to view the conflict between the United States and Osama bin Laden&apos;s terror network: as a contest between Western liberalism and Eastern fanaticism, as suggested by many pundits in the United States; as a struggle between the defenders and the enemies of authentic Islam, as suggested by many in the Muslim world; and as a predictable backlash against American villainy abroad, as suggested by some on the left. But while useful in assessing some dimensions of the conflict, these cultural and political analyses obscure a fundamental reality: that this war, like most of the wars that preceded it, is firmly rooted in geopolitical competition.&quot;&gt;The Geopolitics of War&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20011224&amp;s=klare&quot; title=&quot;The Bush Administration enjoys strong support from Americans and the international community for the campaign against Osama bin Laden. As Richard Falk suggests in this issue [&apos;In Defense of &apos;Just War&apos; Thinking&apos;], a war limited to the destruction of Al Qaeda can be considered a just and proportionate response to the September 11 terror attacks. But a larger effort, aimed at any number of states and individuals with no apparent connection to September 11, must not be viewed in that light. Such a campaign should be denounced as a dangerous example of &apos;mission creep,&apos; intended to further the ambitions of certain strategists and politicians in Washington while exposing US soldiers and the American people to additional bouts of deadly violence. &quot;&gt;Wars Without End&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20021007&amp;s=klare&quot; title=&quot;As the United States gears up for an invasion of Iraq, the great unanswered question continues to be: Why is the Bush Administration so determined to topple a government that has been effectively contained by American power for eleven years? The White House has offered several reasons to justify an attack on Iraq--Saddam Hussein is on the verge of obtaining nuclear weapons; an invasion is needed to prevent the transfer of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons to international terrorists, and so on. Another factor, however, may be of equal importance--oil. Two key concerns underlie the Administration&apos;s thinking: First, the United States is becoming dangerously dependent on imported petroleum to meet its daily energy requirements, and, second, Iraq possesses the world&apos;s largest reserves of untapped petroleum after Saudi Arabia.&quot;&gt;Oiling the Wheels of War&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20050425&amp;s=klare&quot; title=&quot;As the Defense Department begins to look beyond the war in Iraq, a major priority will be to commence a systematic realignment of US forces and bases abroad. This massive undertaking will result in a substantial reduction of American forces in Germany and South Korea, and the establishment of new facilities in Eastern Europe, the Caspian Sea basin, Southeast Asia and Africa. Tens of thousands of troops (and their dependents) now stationed abroad will be redeployed to the United States, while fresh contingents will be sent to areas that have never before housed a permanent US military presence. These steps are largely justified in terms of military effectiveness--to eliminate obsolete cold war facilities and ease the transport of American troops to likely scenes of conflict. Underlying the planning, however, is a new approach to combat and a fresh calculus of the nation&apos;s geopolitical interests.&quot;&gt;Imperial Reach&lt;/a&gt; from his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/directory/bios/bio.mhtml?id=145&quot; title=&quot;Michael T. Klare, professor of Peace and World Security Studies at Hampshire College and defense correspondent of The Nation, is the author of Resource Wars and, most recently, Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America&apos;s Growing Petroleum Dependency.&quot;&gt;articles&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;em&gt;The Nation&lt;/em&gt; alone. Here is an excerpt from his previous &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkingpeace.com/Lib/lib062.html&quot; title=&quot;The protection of critical raw materials and transit routes has, of course, been a major theme in American security policy for a very long time. In the late 1800s, for example, the nation&apos;s leading naval strategist, Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan, won widespread support for his argument that growing U.S. participation in international trade required the establishment of a large and powerful navy. Similar views were advanced by President Theodore Roosevelt in the early 1900s, and later by key figures in the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Concern over the safety of resource supplies also influenced American strategy during World War II and the immediate postwar period. Only with the outbreak of the Cold War did U.S. strategists diminish their emphasis on resource issues, turning their attention instead to political and military developments in Europe and Asia. &quot;&gt;Resource Wars&lt;/a&gt; and here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GC24Dj01.html&quot; title=&quot;The worldwide decline in new discoveries has profound implications for the global supply of energy and, by extension, the world economy. Given a recent surge in energy demand from China and other rapidly developing countries, the US Department of Energy (DoE) predicts that, for all future energy needs to be satisfied, total world oil output will have to climb by 50% between now and 2025; from, that is, approximately 80 million to 120 million barrels per day. A staggering increase in global production, that extra 40 million barrels per day would be the equivalent of total world daily consumption in 1969. Absent major new discoveries, however, the global oil industry will likely prove incapable of providing all of this additional energy. Without massive new oil discoveries, prices will rise, supplies will dwindle, and the world economy will plunge into recession - or worse.&quot; title=&quot;So while the major stockholders of Exxon, Chevron and the other oil giants may be exulting at the moment, the rest of us should be deeply disturbed by their recent reports. Despite all the optimistic talk from Washington, we are facing a substantial and inescapable threat of global energy scarcity, which can only have dire consequences for our economy and the world&apos;s. Indeed, we are beginning to see hints of that today, with rising prices at the neighborhood gas pump and a perceptible decline in consumer spending. This coming scarcity cannot be wished away, nor can it be erased through drilling in the US&apos;s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, which contains far too little petroleum to make a significant difference even in US oil supplies. Only an ambitious program of energy conservation - entailing the imposition of much higher fuel-efficiency standards for US automobiles - and the massive funding of research and development in, and then the full-scale development of alternative, environmentally friendly fuels can offer hope of averting the disaster otherwise awaiting us.&quot;&gt;Scraping the bottom of the barrel&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fpif.org/papers/03petropol/politics.html&quot; title=&quot;In its pursuit of petroleum, the United States is intruding in the affairs of the oil-supplying nations. In the process, it exposes itself to increased risk of involvement in local and regional conflicts. This reality has already influenced U.S. relations with the major oil-producing nations and is sure to have an even greater impact in the future... Whether or not the administration consciously linked energy with its security policy, Bush undeniable prioritized the enhancement of U.S. power projection at the same time he endorsed increased dependence on oil from unstable areas. As a result, a two-pronged strategy governs U.S. policy toward much of the world. One arm of this strategy is to secure more oil from the rest of the world, and the other is to enhance the capability to intervene. While one of these objectives arises from energy preoccupations and the other from security concerns, the upshot is a single direction for U.S. dominance in the 21st Century. It is this combination of strategies, more than anything else, that will anchor the United States&apos; international relations for years to come.&quot;&gt;Bush-Cheney Energy Strategy: Procuring the Rest of the World&apos;s Oil&lt;/a&gt;. Well, as to his position on current events, I don&apos;t think we need to draw a picture here.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41194</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:27:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21218/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/iraniraq.htm"&gt;Iran and Iraq: too much there for countries to ignore&lt;/a&gt; If the peaceniks in the U.S. insist that going into Iraq is an attempt to get hold of the oil, then it might equally be said that those nations opposed to an American attack on Iraq also have self-interest in not wanting America to enter Iraq.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21218</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:11:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


