<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Iraq and usa</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Iraq+usa</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Iraq' and 'usa' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:07:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:07:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Sixth generation warfare: boner pills.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77749/Sixth%2Dgeneration%2Dwarfare%2Dboner%2Dpills</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/25/AR2008122500931.html?nav=rss_nation/special"&gt;The&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7800549.stm&quot;&gt;little&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=12&amp;year=2008&amp;base_name=the_little_blue_pill_goes_to_w&quot;&gt;blue&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/welcomed-with-flowers-sweets-and.html&quot;&gt;pill&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/12/26/viagracounterinsurgency/&quot;&gt;goes &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-woviag1226,0,4106028.story&quot;&gt;to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=axJR3JzAFUhM&amp;refer=home&quot;&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77749</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:07:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>ed</category>
		<category>espionage</category>
		<category>international</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>love</category>
		<category>manipulation</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>viagra</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>mek</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Men love their country, not because it is great, but because it is their own.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69485/Men%2Dlove%2Dtheir%2Dcountry%2Dnot%2Dbecause%2Dit%2Dis%2Dgreat%2Dbut%2Dbecause%2Dit%2Dis%2Dtheir%2Down</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/multimedia/2008/02/gallery_abu_ghraib"&gt;This is how we do it.&lt;/a&gt; [NSFW]  Disturbing new photos from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/05/10/040510fa_fact&quot;&gt;Abu Ghraib&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69485</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:12:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>nsfw</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>plexi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Impeachment Day</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63904/Impeachment%2DDay</link>
		<description> Clinton White House Spokesman Joe Lockhart does stand-up. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themoth.org/artofthestory_impeachmentday&quot;&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt;, or if you prefer there is some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thisamericanlife.com/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=338&quot;&gt;audio &lt;/a&gt;at the 51min mark from This American Life.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63904</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:52:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>BillClinton</category>
		<category>Clinton</category>
		<category>impeachment</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>JoeLockhart</category>
		<category>Lockhart</category>
		<category>MonicaLewinsky</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Russia</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>East Manitoba Regional Junior Kabaddi Champion &apos;94</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59435/Tomorrow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/13710030/leaving_iraq_the_grim_truth/print"&gt;&quot; No matter what happens now&lt;/a&gt; the Islamists will have beaten both of the superpowers -- first the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, and now the United States in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16610767/site/newsweek/&quot;&gt;heart of Islam&lt;/a&gt;. The impact of that in Islamic civilization is going to be enormous. We have made bin Laden a prophet: His organizing concept for Al Qaeda was &quot;The Russians are a lot tougher than the Americans. If we can beat the Russians, then we can eventually beat the Americans.&quot; &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Rolling Stone assembles a panel of military and history experts on the state, and future, of Iraq.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59435</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rape within the US military.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59268/Rape%2Dwithin%2Dthe%2DUS%2Dmilitary</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/07/women_in_military/"&gt;The private war of women soldiers.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Last year, Col. Janis Karpinski caused a stir by publicly reporting that in 2003, three female soldiers had died of dehydration in Iraq, which can get up to 126 degrees in the summer, because they refused to drink liquids late in the day. They were afraid of being raped by male soldiers if they walked to the latrines after dark.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59268</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:31:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>rape</category>
		<category>soldier</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Sticherbeast</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Soldier&apos;s Thoughts.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58436/A%2DSoldiers%2DThoughts</link>
		<description> While there have been many posts on Mefi of blogs written by those affected by the Iraq War, I have not seen this one posted. No matter your stance on the war, your opinion of American soldiers, or the amount of other Iraq war blogs you&apos;ve read, all I ask is that you &lt;a href=&quot;http://misoldierthoughts.blogspot.com/2005/04/memories-of-death.html&quot;&gt;at least&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://misoldierthoughts.blogspot.com/2005/05/it-was-still-dark.html&quot;&gt;read&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://misoldierthoughts.blogspot.com/2005/05/my-thoughts-on-monsters.html&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://misoldierthoughts.blogspot.com/2005/06/sticks-and-stonesbut-words-can-never.html&quot;&gt;few&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://misoldierthoughts.blogspot.com/2005/10/our-walk-through-life.html&quot;&gt;entries&lt;/a&gt;. I&apos;ve used too many words already, when the journal does more than enough to speak for itself. &lt;a href=&quot;http://misoldierthoughts.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;A Soldier&apos;s Thoughts.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0618570519/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;via)&lt;/a&gt; [more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58436</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:52:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>coping</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>family</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>humanity</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>journal</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>love</category>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>soldier</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>writing</category>
		<dc:creator>wander</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who do the troops support?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56065/Who%2Ddo%2Dthe%2Dtroops%2Dsupport</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/110406Z.shtml"&gt;US Military Papers open fire on Rummy.&lt;/a&gt; Tomorrow, the Army Times -- and all other Military Times papers, including Navy and Air Force Times -- will run an editorial calling for Donald Rumsfeld to tender his resignation or be fired, due to his gross incompetence in handling the Iraq quagmire.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56065</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:01:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>lazaruslong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq? Turkey? Ah, who cares, they&apos;re all Ay-rabs anyway...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50464/Iraq%2DTurkey%2DAh%2Dwho%2Dcares%2Dtheyre%2Dall%2DAyrabs%2Danyway</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008026.php"&gt;Baghdad is calm, except it&apos;s neither.&lt;/a&gt; So this guy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kaloogianforcongress.com&quot;&gt;Howard Kaloogian&lt;/a&gt; is running for Congress in California, and he supports the troops. Thinks they&apos;re making all sorts of progress that simply isn&apos;t reported by the evil lib&apos;rul mainstream media, so he went to see Baghdad for himself, and posted a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&amp;address=364x776401#779111&quot;&gt;picture&lt;/a&gt; of a calm Baghdad street - See? No terrorists here!

Except that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008029.php&quot;&gt;certain&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/003008.html&quot;&gt;sleuthing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2006/3/28/152755/284/758#c758&quot;&gt;types&lt;/a&gt; found something awfully fishy about that photo...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50464</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:54:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Baghdad</category>
		<category>dirtytricks</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>HowardKaloogian</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>Istanbul</category>
		<category>photo</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>kgasmart</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Don&apos;t Bomb Us.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47007/Dont%2DBomb%2DUs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/"&gt;Don&apos;t Bomb Us.&lt;/a&gt; In response to credible reports that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16397937&amp;amp;method=full&amp;amp;siteid=94762&amp;amp;headline=exclusive--bush-plot-to-bomb-his-arab-ally-name_page.html&quot;&gt;Bush wanted to bomb al-Jazeera&apos;s HQ in allied Qatar&lt;/a&gt; (discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46896&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46967&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; on MeFi), Al Jazeera staffers start their own English-language blog. Their site contains remembrances of their &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/2005/11/tayseer-allouni-colleague-friend-and.html&quot;&gt;fallen colleagues&lt;/a&gt;, firsthand &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/2005/11/that-dreadful-night-in-bagdad.html&quot;&gt;accounts of US attacks&lt;/a&gt; on their offices, links to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20051212/scahill&quot;&gt;relevant&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=1198&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level.php?cat=CultureAndMedia&amp;amp;loid=8.0.232620063&amp;amp;par=&quot;&gt;controversy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/23885066@N00/&quot;&gt;Flickr photosets&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/23885066@N00/sets/1442137/&quot;&gt;protests calling for an official investigation&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/07256105-B2FC-439A-B255-D830BB238EA1.htm&quot;&gt;al Jazeera&apos;s code of ethics&lt;/a&gt;. Also, a quick note to Tony Blair: &quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/2005/11/mr-blair-will-you-take-our-call.html&quot;&gt;P.S. Thanks for talking Mr. Bush out of bombing our offices!&lt;/a&gt;&quot; Not surprisingly, their blog is generating &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/2005/11/that-dreadful-night-in-bagdad.html#c113289154945221855&quot;&gt;some comments&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47007</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:59:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>al-Jazeera</category>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Qatar</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>UnitedKingdom</category>
		<category>unitedstatesofamerica</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>edverb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fighting the Liberal Media Bias</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46896/Fighting%2Dthe%2DLiberal%2DMedia%2DBias</link>
		<description> In 2001 America &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1654107.stm&quot;&gt;destroyed &lt;/a&gt;the Kabul offices of al-Jazeera with two smartbombs; officials said it was an accident. In 2003 America &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2928153.stm&quot;&gt;destroyed&lt;/a&gt; the Baghdad offices of al-Jazeera with missiles; officials said it was an accident. Now, two British civil servants are on trial for leaking a memo revealing that Bush intended to bomb al-Jazeera...&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16397937&amp;method=full&amp;siteid=94762&amp;headline=exclusive--bush-plot-to-bomb-his-arab-ally-name_page.html&quot;&gt; at their headquarters in allied Qatar&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46896</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:28:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Qatar</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>UnitedKingdom</category>
		<category>UnitedStatesOfAmerica</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Pretty_Generic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>November 2nd - A day of protest</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46109/November%2D2nd%2DA%2Dday%2Dof%2Dprotest</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.worldcantwait.org"&gt;Take this opportunity to get involved. November 2nd - A day of protest&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9787692/site/newsweek/&quot;&gt;With possible indictments of senior Bush aides this week&lt;/a&gt; Bush has to be feeling the pressure. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/358714p-305660c.html&quot;&gt;Reports&lt;/a&gt; point to a down and disillusioned president.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46109</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:02:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>in</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>president</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Chris_awesome</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Al Gore surprises</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45682/Al%2DGore%2Dsurprises</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/10/06/D8D2IU703.html"&gt;A surprise from Al Gore:&lt;/a&gt; I came here today because I believe that American democracy is in grave danger. It is no longer possible to ignore the strangeness of our public discourse . I know that I am not the only one who feels that something has gone basically and badly wrong in the way America&apos;s fabled &quot;marketplace of ideas&quot; now functions. 

How many of you, I wonder, have heard a friend or a family member in the last few years remark that it&apos;s almost as if America has entered &quot;an alternate universe&quot;? 

I thought maybe it was an aberration when three-quarters of Americans said they believed that Saddam Hussein was responsible for attacking us on September 11, 2001. But more than four years later, between a third and a half still believe Saddam was personally responsible for planning and supporting the attack.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45682</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:37:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>algore</category>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gore</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Shanachie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Wrong War &amp;amp; Exit Strategy:Civil War &amp;amp; News From Kirkuk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42777/The%2DWrong%2DWar%2Dand%2DExit%2DStrategyCivil%2DWar%2Dand%2DNews%2DFrom%2DKirkuk</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;A distinction between &#8220;old&#8221; and &#8220;new&#8221; wars is vital. &#8220;Old wars&#8221; are wars between states where the aim is the military capture of territory and the decisive encounter is battle between armed forces. &#8220;New wars&#8221;, in contrast, take place in the context of failing states. They are wars fought by networks of state and non-state actors, where battles are rare and violence is directed mainly against civilians, and which are characterised by a new type of political economy that combines extremist politics and criminality... I argue in this article that the United States viewed its invasion of Iraq as an updated version of &#8220;old war&#8221; that made use of new technology. The US failure to understand the reality on the ground in Iraq and the tendency to impose its own view of what war should be like is immensely dangerous and carries the risk of being self-perpetuating. It does not have to be this way. &lt;/small&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opendemocracy.net/articles/ViewPopUpArticle.jsp?id=2&amp;articleId=2591&quot; title=&quot;In early June 2005, it is hard to be optimistic. The insurgency is escalating - more attacks, more casualties, more groups and more names are reported daily. The idea of Bush as a successful wartime leader, pioneering the new technology-intensive form of warfare, helped contribute to his November 2004 election victory; the more hawkish elements of his first administration have been reappointed and promoted. The American pursuit of a moral crusade reinforces the insurgents&#8217; notion of a global jihad. Indeed, the new war in Iraq can increasingly be viewed as the stage for a global new war, which will be hard to contain as the ideas and experiences spread and hard to end because of the bitterness, fear and hate that are mobilised in war... Will reality bring about a questioning of the story of old war and its contemporary relevance? Are other actors - the United Nations, the European Union, together with Iraqi civil society - able, even at this late stage, to develop an alternative strategy: one based on constructive, democratic, forward-thinking principles that could offer a convincing way forward for Iraq&#8217;s people, and might help to avert a global new war?&quot;&gt;Iraq: the wrong war &lt;/a&gt; - Mary Kaldor writes of what was happening in pre-invasion Iraq, what happened thereafter and what the alternatives were. Well, there is always &lt;a href=&quot;http://207.44.245.159/article9099.htm&quot; title=&quot;Against all odds, a national liberation front is emerging in Iraq. Washington hawks may see it coming, but they certainly don&apos;t want it. Many groups in this front have already met in Algiers. The front is opposed to the American occupation and permanent Pentagon military bases; opposed to the privatization and corporate looting of the Iraqi economy; and opposed to the federation of Iraq, ie balkanization... The Bush administration though is pulling no punches with Iraqification. It&apos;s a Pandora&apos;s box: inside one will find the Battle of Algiers, Vietnam, El Salvador, Colombia. All point to the same destination: civil war. This deadly litany could easily go on until 2020 when, in a brave new world of China emerging as the top economy, Sunni Arabs would finally convince themselves to perhaps strike a deal with Shi&apos;ites and Kurds so they can all profit together by selling billions of barrels of oil to the Chinese oil majors. If, of course, there is any semblance of Iraq left at that point.&quot;&gt;Exit strategy: Civil war.&lt;/a&gt;  And on that, note this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/14/AR2005061401828_pf.html&quot; title=&quot;Police and security units, forces led by Kurdish political parties and backed by the U.S. military, have abducted hundreds of minority Arabs and Turkmens in this intensely volatile city and spirited them to prisons in Kurdish-held northern Iraq, according to U.S. and Iraqi officials, government documents and families of the victims. Seized off the streets of Kirkuk or in joint U.S.-Iraqi raids, the men have been transferred secretly and in violation of Iraqi law to prisons in the Kurdish cities of Irbil and Sulaymaniyah, sometimes with the knowledge of U.S. forces. The detainees, including merchants, members of tribal families and soldiers, have often remained missing for months; some have been tortured, according to released prisoners and the Kirkuk police chief.&quot;&gt;Kurdish Officials Sanction Abductions in Kirkuk&lt;/a&gt;--a city from which, I am afraid, we will hear more and more as time goes by.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42777</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:17:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>exitstrategy</category>
		<category>failedstates</category>
		<category>failingstates</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqWar</category>
		<category>MaryKaldor</category>
		<category>presidentbush</category>
		<category>strategy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Why does America hate America so much?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42502/Why%2Ddoes%2DAmerica%2Dhate%2DAmerica%2Dso%2Dmuch</link>
		<description> Rep. John Conyers has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://johnconyers.campaignoffice.com/index.asp?Type=SUPERFORMS&amp;SEC=%7B120FBD30-EC95-47B0-84FA-E2FFC022265C%7D%20&quot;&gt;petition&lt;/a&gt; 
on his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnconyers.campaignoffice.com/&quot;&gt;congressional website&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnconyers.campaignoffice.com/index.asp?Type=SUPERFORMS&amp;SEC=&quot;&gt;urging 
constituents&lt;/a&gt; to sign on to a letter to President Bush requesting he answer 
the questions about the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/&quot;&gt;Downing 
Street Memo&lt;/a&gt;&quot; posed to him by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/14018.html&quot;&gt;89 
Members of Congress&lt;/a&gt;. Going even further, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/42433&quot;&gt;Ralph 
Nader&lt;/a&gt;, and former &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/21/1531214&quot;&gt;United 
States Attorney General Ramsey Clark&lt;/a&gt; among others, are calling for impeachment. 
Recently, Reps. Kucinich &amp;amp; Abercrombie wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/oh10_kucinich/050517usatodayoped.html&quot;&gt;USA 
Today Op-Ed &lt;/a&gt;calling For US withdrawal from Iraq. Meanwhile, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=lang_en&amp;c2coff=1&amp;q=poll%2Bapproval%2Biraq%2Bwar&amp;btnG=Search&quot;&gt;approval 
ratings&lt;/a&gt; for President Bush and the war in Iraq continue to plummet. Does this 
represent a sea change in public opinion and a coming shift in the political landscape?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42502</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 10:09:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DowningStreetMemo</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>JohnConyers</category>
		<category>petition</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>stenseng</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>to export violence to the four corners of the globe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41313/to%2Dexport%2Dviolence%2Dto%2Dthe%2Dfour%2Dcorners%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dglobe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/people/features/11774/index.html"&gt;Now here&apos;s an interesting story.&lt;/a&gt; And well worth the read. It mentions some disturbing facts - he reloads and starts shooting again - but is still sympathetic to our hero. Of course if you compare it with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20050215-091407-8035r.htm&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;...
&quot;nothing to see here folks, keep moving right along!&quot; Oh, and is &quot;frought&quot; a word?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41313</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>crimes</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>murder</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>warcrimes</category>
		<dc:creator>milkwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Regarding Blood And Oil</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41194/Regarding%2DBlood%2DAnd%2DOil</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;Whereas, in the past, national power was thought to reside in the possession of a mighty arsenal and the maintenance of extended alliance systems, it is now associated with economic dynamism and the cultivation of technological innovation. To exercise leadership in the current epoch, states are expected to possess a vigorous domestic economy and to outperform other states in the development and export of high-tech goods. While a potent military establishment is still considered essential to national security, it must be balanced by a strong and vibrant economy. &apos;National security depends on successful engagement in the global economy,&apos; the Institute for National Security Studies observed in a recent Pentagon study.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanempireproject.com/bookpage.asp?ISBN=0805073132&quot; title=&quot;Since September 11 and the commencement of the &apos;war on terror,&apos; the world&apos;s attention has been focused on the relationship between U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and the oceans of crude oil that lie beneath the region&apos;s soil. Klare traces oil&apos;s impact on international affairs since World War II, revealing its influence on the Truman, Eisenhower, Nixon, and Carter doctrines. He shows how America&apos;s own wells are drying up as our demand increases; by 2010, the U.S. will need to import 60% of its oil. And since most of this supply will have to come from chronically unstable, often violently anti-American zones -- the Persian Gulf, the Caspian Sea, Latin America, and Africa -- our dependency is bound to lead to recurrent military involvement.&quot;&gt;Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America&apos;s Growing Petroleum Dependency&lt;/a&gt; by Michael T. Klare, here is an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanempireproject.com/bookexcerpt.asp?ISBN=0805073132&quot; title=&quot;Tampa, Florida, is not one of the places you usually think of as a hub for American relations with the oil kingdoms of the Persian Gulf. It does not, like Houston, play host to any of the giant US. oil companies; it does not, like Washington, D.C., house the State Department and foreign embassies; and it does not, like New York, lay claim to the United Nations and the international news media. But Tampa does have something that none of those other cities can claim: the headquarters of the U.S. Central Command (Centcom), the nerve center for all U.S. military operations in the Persian Gulf region, including those now under way in Afghanistan and Iraq. Centcom forces, operating as they do in the greater Middle East, occupy the front lines in the war against terrorism and play a critical role in efforts to prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction. From its very inception, however, Centcom&apos;s principal task has been to protect the global flow of petroleum. &quot;&gt;excerpt&lt;/a&gt; from the book and here is his most recent article--&lt;a href=&quot;http://antiwar.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=Oil+and+the+Coming+War+With+Iran+-+by+Michael+T.+Klare+and+Tom+Engelhardt&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=13880692&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.antiwar.com%2Fengelhardt%2F%3Farticleid%3D5540&amp;partnerID=16&quot; title=&quot;Before proceeding further, let me state for the record that I do not claim oil is the sole driving force behind the Bush administration&apos;s apparent determination to destroy Iranian military capabilities. No doubt there are many national security professionals in Washington who are truly worried about Iran&apos;s nuclear program, just as there were many professionals who were genuinely worried about Iraqi weapons capabilities... Because Iran occupies a strategic location on the north side of the Persian Gulf, it is in a position to threaten oil fields in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, and the United Arab Emirates, which together possess more than half of the world&apos;s known oil reserves. Iran also sits athwart the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which, daily, 40 percent of the world&apos;s oil exports pass. In addition, Iran is becoming a major supplier of oil and natural gas to China, India, and Japan, thereby giving Tehran additional clout in world affairs. It is these geopolitical dimensions of energy, as much as Iran&apos;s potential to export significant quantities of oil to the United States, that undoubtedly govern the administration&apos;s strategic calculations.&quot;&gt;Oil and the Coming War With Iran&lt;/a&gt;. Well, at least he has been consistent--consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20011105&amp;s=klare&quot; title=&quot;There are many ways to view the conflict between the United States and Osama bin Laden&apos;s terror network: as a contest between Western liberalism and Eastern fanaticism, as suggested by many pundits in the United States; as a struggle between the defenders and the enemies of authentic Islam, as suggested by many in the Muslim world; and as a predictable backlash against American villainy abroad, as suggested by some on the left. But while useful in assessing some dimensions of the conflict, these cultural and political analyses obscure a fundamental reality: that this war, like most of the wars that preceded it, is firmly rooted in geopolitical competition.&quot;&gt;The Geopolitics of War&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20011224&amp;s=klare&quot; title=&quot;The Bush Administration enjoys strong support from Americans and the international community for the campaign against Osama bin Laden. As Richard Falk suggests in this issue [&apos;In Defense of &apos;Just War&apos; Thinking&apos;], a war limited to the destruction of Al Qaeda can be considered a just and proportionate response to the September 11 terror attacks. But a larger effort, aimed at any number of states and individuals with no apparent connection to September 11, must not be viewed in that light. Such a campaign should be denounced as a dangerous example of &apos;mission creep,&apos; intended to further the ambitions of certain strategists and politicians in Washington while exposing US soldiers and the American people to additional bouts of deadly violence. &quot;&gt;Wars Without End&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20021007&amp;s=klare&quot; title=&quot;As the United States gears up for an invasion of Iraq, the great unanswered question continues to be: Why is the Bush Administration so determined to topple a government that has been effectively contained by American power for eleven years? The White House has offered several reasons to justify an attack on Iraq--Saddam Hussein is on the verge of obtaining nuclear weapons; an invasion is needed to prevent the transfer of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons to international terrorists, and so on. Another factor, however, may be of equal importance--oil. Two key concerns underlie the Administration&apos;s thinking: First, the United States is becoming dangerously dependent on imported petroleum to meet its daily energy requirements, and, second, Iraq possesses the world&apos;s largest reserves of untapped petroleum after Saudi Arabia.&quot;&gt;Oiling the Wheels of War&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20050425&amp;s=klare&quot; title=&quot;As the Defense Department begins to look beyond the war in Iraq, a major priority will be to commence a systematic realignment of US forces and bases abroad. This massive undertaking will result in a substantial reduction of American forces in Germany and South Korea, and the establishment of new facilities in Eastern Europe, the Caspian Sea basin, Southeast Asia and Africa. Tens of thousands of troops (and their dependents) now stationed abroad will be redeployed to the United States, while fresh contingents will be sent to areas that have never before housed a permanent US military presence. These steps are largely justified in terms of military effectiveness--to eliminate obsolete cold war facilities and ease the transport of American troops to likely scenes of conflict. Underlying the planning, however, is a new approach to combat and a fresh calculus of the nation&apos;s geopolitical interests.&quot;&gt;Imperial Reach&lt;/a&gt; from his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/directory/bios/bio.mhtml?id=145&quot; title=&quot;Michael T. Klare, professor of Peace and World Security Studies at Hampshire College and defense correspondent of The Nation, is the author of Resource Wars and, most recently, Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America&apos;s Growing Petroleum Dependency.&quot;&gt;articles&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;em&gt;The Nation&lt;/em&gt; alone. Here is an excerpt from his previous &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkingpeace.com/Lib/lib062.html&quot; title=&quot;The protection of critical raw materials and transit routes has, of course, been a major theme in American security policy for a very long time. In the late 1800s, for example, the nation&apos;s leading naval strategist, Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan, won widespread support for his argument that growing U.S. participation in international trade required the establishment of a large and powerful navy. Similar views were advanced by President Theodore Roosevelt in the early 1900s, and later by key figures in the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Concern over the safety of resource supplies also influenced American strategy during World War II and the immediate postwar period. Only with the outbreak of the Cold War did U.S. strategists diminish their emphasis on resource issues, turning their attention instead to political and military developments in Europe and Asia. &quot;&gt;Resource Wars&lt;/a&gt; and here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GC24Dj01.html&quot; title=&quot;The worldwide decline in new discoveries has profound implications for the global supply of energy and, by extension, the world economy. Given a recent surge in energy demand from China and other rapidly developing countries, the US Department of Energy (DoE) predicts that, for all future energy needs to be satisfied, total world oil output will have to climb by 50% between now and 2025; from, that is, approximately 80 million to 120 million barrels per day. A staggering increase in global production, that extra 40 million barrels per day would be the equivalent of total world daily consumption in 1969. Absent major new discoveries, however, the global oil industry will likely prove incapable of providing all of this additional energy. Without massive new oil discoveries, prices will rise, supplies will dwindle, and the world economy will plunge into recession - or worse.&quot; title=&quot;So while the major stockholders of Exxon, Chevron and the other oil giants may be exulting at the moment, the rest of us should be deeply disturbed by their recent reports. Despite all the optimistic talk from Washington, we are facing a substantial and inescapable threat of global energy scarcity, which can only have dire consequences for our economy and the world&apos;s. Indeed, we are beginning to see hints of that today, with rising prices at the neighborhood gas pump and a perceptible decline in consumer spending. This coming scarcity cannot be wished away, nor can it be erased through drilling in the US&apos;s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, which contains far too little petroleum to make a significant difference even in US oil supplies. Only an ambitious program of energy conservation - entailing the imposition of much higher fuel-efficiency standards for US automobiles - and the massive funding of research and development in, and then the full-scale development of alternative, environmentally friendly fuels can offer hope of averting the disaster otherwise awaiting us.&quot;&gt;Scraping the bottom of the barrel&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fpif.org/papers/03petropol/politics.html&quot; title=&quot;In its pursuit of petroleum, the United States is intruding in the affairs of the oil-supplying nations. In the process, it exposes itself to increased risk of involvement in local and regional conflicts. This reality has already influenced U.S. relations with the major oil-producing nations and is sure to have an even greater impact in the future... Whether or not the administration consciously linked energy with its security policy, Bush undeniable prioritized the enhancement of U.S. power projection at the same time he endorsed increased dependence on oil from unstable areas. As a result, a two-pronged strategy governs U.S. policy toward much of the world. One arm of this strategy is to secure more oil from the rest of the world, and the other is to enhance the capability to intervene. While one of these objectives arises from energy preoccupations and the other from security concerns, the upshot is a single direction for U.S. dominance in the 21st Century. It is this combination of strategies, more than anything else, that will anchor the United States&apos; international relations for years to come.&quot;&gt;Bush-Cheney Energy Strategy: Procuring the Rest of the World&apos;s Oil&lt;/a&gt;. Well, as to his position on current events, I don&apos;t think we need to draw a picture here.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41194</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:27:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>energy</category>
		<category>Iran</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>From The Never Ending Story - The Torture Papers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40410/From%2DThe%2DNever%2DEnding%2DStory%2DThe%2DTorture%2DPapers</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;small&gt;While the proverbial road to hell is paved with good intentions, the internal government memos collected in this publication demonstrate that the path to the purgatory that is Guantanamo Bay, or Abu Ghraib, has been paved with decidedly bad intentions. The policies that resulted in rampant abuse of detainees first in Afghanistan, then at Guantanamo Bay, and later in Iraq, were product of three pernicious purposes designed to facilitate the unilateral and unfettered detention, interrogation, abuse, judgment, and punishment of prisoners: (1) the desire to place the detainees beyond the reach of any court or law; (2) the desire to abrogate the Geneva Convention with respect to the treatment of persons seized in the context of armed hostilities; and (3) the desire to absolve those implementing the policies of any liability for war crimes under U.S. and international law.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Regarding the &lt;a href=&quot;http://scoop.agonist.org/story/2005/2/25/93911/1890&quot; title=&quot;The memoranda that comprise this volume follow a logical sequence: (1) find a location secure not only from attack and infiltration, but also, and perhaps more importantly in light of the December 28, 2001, memo that commences this trail, from intervention by the courts; (2) rescind the U.S.&apos;s agreement to abide by the proscriptions of the Geneva Convention with respect to the treatment of persons captured during armed conflict; and (3) provide an interpretation of the law that protects policy makers and their instruments in the field from potential war crimes prosecution for their acts. The result, as clear from the arrogant rectitude emanating from the memos, was unchecked power, and the abuse that inevitably followed.&quot;&gt;Torture&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/02/15/features/bookwed.html&quot; title=&quot;&apos;The Torture Papers,&apos; the new compendium of government memos and reports chronicling the road to Abu Ghraib and its aftermath, definitively blows such arguments to pieces. In fact, the book provides a damning paper trail that reveals, in uninflected bureaucratic prose, the roots that those terrible images had in decisions made at the highest levels of the Bush administration - decisions that started the torture snowball rolling down the slippery slope of precedent by asserting that the United States need not abide by the Geneva conventions in its war on terror.&quot;&gt;Papers&lt;/a&gt;, which detail &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i20/20a01201.htm#torture&quot; title=&quot;Notable Moments In The Torture Debates&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i20/20a01201.htm&quot; title=&quot;A new collection of government memoranda, some written by professors, shows how officials justified prisoner abuse in the campaign against terrorism &quot;&gt;Paper Trail&lt;/a&gt;, and, then there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://bostonreview.net/BR30.1/deborahstone.html&quot; title=&quot;By some unholy coincidence, the terms &apos;water boarding&apos; and &apos;air hunger&apos; entered my vocabulary in the same week. They came by such different routes, though, that I didn&#8217;t know how they were related until some time later. &quot;&gt;Hungry for Air&lt;/a&gt;: Learning The Language Of Torture, and, of course, there&apos;s &lt;small&gt;( more inside)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40410</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GenevaConvention</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Guantanamo</category>
		<category>GuantanamoBay</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>POWs</category>
		<category>prisoners</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is Iraq really Cuba?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40235/Is%2DIraq%2Dreally%2DCuba</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/tennant/tennant7.html"&gt;Freedom&apos;s Defenders or Politicians&apos; Pawns?&lt;/a&gt; No pretense of protecting Americans&#8217; freedom went into the decision to enter into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/spanishamerican/section4.rhtml&quot;&gt;Spanish-American War&lt;/a&gt;.  It was out-and-out imperialism and nothing more.  Veterans of that war may have helped to liberate   Cuba   ,  Guam  ,  Puerto Rico  , and the   Philippines    from Spanish rule; but those same veterans then turned around and rammed the jackboot of the   U. S.    military into the faces of those they had just liberated.  Hundreds of thousands of Cubans and Filipinos, who had thought they were being freed only to find out they had merely exchanged one colonial master for another, were killed in their own independence-from-Uncle-Sam movements.  When they finally did throw off direct   U. S.    rule, they were then saddled with dictators of Uncle Sam&#8217;s choosing.  No credit for the defense of Americans&#8217; freedom can be granted to veterans of this war.  

Compare to this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/&quot;&gt;Gunning For Saddam&lt;/a&gt;

We report,  you decide indeed...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40235</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:02:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>imperialism</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>PBS</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>SpanishAmericanWar</category>
		<category>StrikeTheRoot</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Elim</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Virgins talkin&apos; about sex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39319/Virgins%2Dtalkin%2Dabout%2Dsex</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/02/03/general.shoot/"&gt;Virgins talk about sex.&lt;/a&gt; Fish gotta swim, birds gotta fly, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/4153541/detail.html&quot;&gt;marines gotta kill the enemy&lt;/a&gt;. I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhymezone.com/r/rhyme.cgi?Word=flippant&amp;typeofrhyme=def&amp;org1=syl&amp;org2=l&quot;&gt;&apos;Flippant&apos;&lt;/a&gt; is an accurate term from the Vice Adm. But most of the flak&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usmc.mil/genbios2.nsf/0/35E4CF7347323B108525680800620EED?opendocument&quot;&gt; this  monk&lt;/a&gt; is catching is from folks who say how killing the enemy &quot;should&quot; be.  He&apos;s been called a &lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=psychopath&quot;&gt;psychopath&lt;/a&gt;, but  it seems to me his emotional investment belies that. 
So do we then want robots? The civilian issue of why or where or when to fight aside - do we have the right to derogate how a soldier feels about doing his duty?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39319</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 07:07:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>JamesMattis</category>
		<category>LieutenantGeneral</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Smedleyman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Documents: U.S. condoned Iraq oil smuggling</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39279/Documents%2DUS%2Dcondoned%2DIraq%2Doil%2Dsmuggling</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/02/02/iraq.oil.smuggle/"&gt;Documents: U.S. condoned Iraq oil smuggling&lt;/a&gt; Documents obtained by CNN reveal the United States knew about, and even condoned, embargo-breaking oil sales by Saddam Hussein&apos;s regime, and did so to shore up alliances with Iraq&apos;s neighbors.

The oil trade with countries such as Turkey and Jordan appears to have been an open secret inside the U.S. government and the United Nations for years.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39279</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:26:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>embargo</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>japan</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>oilsales</category>
		<category>saddam</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<category>tradeembargo</category>
		<category>turkey</category>
		<category>u.s.</category>
		<category>unitednations</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Thanks for the memories</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39105/Thanks%2Dfor%2Dthe%2Dmemories</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bushflash.com/thanks.html"&gt;Thanks for the memories&lt;/a&gt; ...&quot;I know it&#8217;s a fallacy * That grown men never cry
Baby, that&#8217;s a lie * We had our bed of roses
But forgot that roses die * And thank you so much...&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39105</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:56:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Reagan</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>growabrain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Canadian Lawyers Charge Bush with Torture</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37372/Canadian%2DLawyers%2DCharge%2DBush%2Dwith%2DTorture</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lawyersagainstthewar.org/legalaction/bushcharges.html"&gt;LAWs instructions for starting criminal procedures against Bush&lt;/a&gt; Today in Vancouver, Lawyers Against the War filed torture charges against George W. Bush under the Canadian Criminal Code. The charges were laid by Gail Davidson, co-chair of Lawyers against the War--LAW, under provisions enacted pursuant to the U.N. Torture Convention, ratified by both Canada and the United States.  The charges concern the well known abuses of prisoners held by US Armed Forces in the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba.  The charges were accepted by the Justice of the Peace and referred for a hearing to decide whether Bush should be required to appear for trial.  The Attorney General of Canada&apos;s consent is required within eight days for proceedings to continue, and the question of Bush&apos;s diplomatic immunity will have to be resolved by the court.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37372</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 06:45:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>sunexplodes</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rumsfeld&apos;s War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36638/Rumsfelds%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/&quot;&gt;Frontline: Rumsfeld&apos;s War&lt;/a&gt;, a PBS/Washington Post joint documentary that aired earlier this week is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/view/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;. It is the inside story of Rumsfeld&apos;s battle to assert civil control over the military.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36638</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:12:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chainofcommand</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Frontline</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>PBS</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Yeah, but Oedipus didn&apos;t start a war.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36569/Yeah%2Dbut%2DOedipus%2Ddidnt%2Dstart%2Da%2Dwar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guerrillanews.com/articles/article.php?id=761"&gt;Former Bush ghostwriter confirms Bush had plans for Iraq in 1999.&lt;/a&gt; Herskowitz said that Bush expressed frustration at a lifetime as an underachiever in the shadow of an accomplished father. In aggressive military action, he saw the opportunity to emerge from his father&#8217;s shadow. The moment, Herskowitz said, came in the wake of the September 11 attacks. &#8220;Suddenly, he&#8217;s at 91 percent in the polls, and he&#8217;d barely crawled out of the bunker.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36569</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:26:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>frustration</category>
		<category>herskowitz</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>lifetime</category>
		<category>oedipus</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>underachiever</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>RavinDave</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>We knew this.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36310/We%2Dknew%2Dthis</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/9927782.htm"&gt;Confirming the Obvious:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;A Knight Ridder review of the administration&apos;s Iraq policy and decisions has found that it invaded Iraq without a comprehensive plan in place to secure and rebuild the country... The Bush administration&apos;s failure to plan to win the peace in Iraq was the product of many of the same problems that plagued the administration&apos;s case for war, including wishful thinking, bad information from Iraqi exiles who said Iraqis would welcome American troops as liberators and contempt for dissenting opinions.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; Just in case anyone you know is still pretending this administration had the slightest idea what it was doing after &quot;Mission Accomplished.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36310</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:11:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>KnightRidder</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>jscalzi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


