<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Islam and censorship</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Islam+censorship</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Islam' and 'censorship' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:39:23 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:39:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality of what will likely happen to them.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/91285/This%2Dis%2Dnot%2Da%2Dthreat%2Dbut%2Da%2Dwarning%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dreality%2Dof%2Dwhat%2Dwill%2Dlikely%2Dhappen%2Dto%2Dthem</link>
		<description> The creators of South Park were threatened (or &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/21/muslim-group-says-it-is-warning-not-threatening-south-park-creators/&quot;&gt;warned&lt;/a&gt;&quot;) by &lt;a href=&quot;http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:S0v4mrD31jYJ:www.revolutionmuslim.com/+revolution+muslim&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt;Muslim extremists&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(cached, scroll down for article including photo of dead Theo VanGogh)&lt;/small&gt; not to depict the Prophet Mohammad. Parker and Stone thought they&apos;d be able to air the episode by putting Mohammad in a bear suit, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/south-park-episode-is-altered-after-muslim-groups-warning/?src=mv&amp;ref=homepage&quot;&gt;Comedy Central censored the episode&lt;/a&gt; due to the threats. The clip in question is not hosted at South Park&apos;s website, but exists &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gotchamediablog.com/2010/04/south-park-mohammad-in-bear-suit.html&quot;&gt;elsewhere online.&lt;/a&gt; This is not the first time South Park has dealt with &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsbusters.org/node/4917&quot;&gt;censorship of Mohammad&apos;s image&lt;/a&gt;. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/50835/It-Seems-Today-That-All-You-See-Is-Images-of-Mohammed-and-Sex-On-TV&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2010:site.91285</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:39:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>comedycentral</category>
		<category>extremism</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>mattstone</category>
		<category>muhammad</category>
		<category>southpark</category>
		<category>treyparker</category>
		<dc:creator>desjardins</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You Still Can&apos;t Write About Muhammad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74074/You%2DStill%2DCant%2DWrite%2DAbout%2DMuhammad</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121797979078815073.html"&gt;Asra Q. Nomani&lt;/a&gt; writes in The Wall Street Journal on Sherry Jones&apos;s new historical novel, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jewel_of_Medina&quot;&gt;The Jewel of Medina&lt;/a&gt;&quot; about Aisha, the young wife of the prophet Muhammad. Random House has pulled the book for fears of a political and extremist nature. 

In a statement, Random House said: &quot;We stand firmly by our responsibility to support our authors and the free discussion of ideas, even those that may be construed as offensive by some. However, a publisher must weigh that responsibility against others that it also bears, and in this instance we decided, after much deliberation, to postpone publication for the safety of the author, employees of Random House Inc, booksellers and anyone else who would be involved in distribution and sale of the book.&quot;

Over at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/aug/12/islam&quot;&gt;Guardian&lt;/a&gt;, you can read more about the controversy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74074</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:02:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Censorship</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>JewelofMedina</category>
		<category>Jones</category>
		<category>MediaCensorship</category>
		<category>Muhammad</category>
		<category>Randomhouse</category>
		<category>Sherry</category>
		<dc:creator>Fizz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Jihad Will Be Televised</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71794/The%2DJihad%2DWill%2DBe%2DTelevised</link>
		<description> NewsFilter: Sen. Joe Lieberman (ID - Conn.) &lt;a href=&quot;http://lieberman.senate.gov/newsroom/release.cfm?id=298006&quot;&gt;strikes a decisive blow&lt;/a&gt; against another Islamic terror front group: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxu1LwJk7uA&amp;feature=related&quot;&gt;YouTube&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71794</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:44:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>Lieberman</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Schmidt</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>YouTube</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Allah is not welcome here.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49377/Allah%2Dis%2Dnot%2Dwelcome%2Dhere</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/20/yahoo_upsets_religious/"&gt;I&apos;m sorry Mr. Callahan, your surname may offend Muslims.&lt;/a&gt; Yahoo! has banned the use of the word Allah in all usernames. &lt;a href=&quot;http://quickwired.com/kallahar/stories/2005-Yahoo/yahoo.php&quot;&gt;These names&lt;/a&gt; are still available however. &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49377</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:16:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>allah</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>muslims</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Mijo Bijo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I&apos;m naked under this burka...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42962/Im%2Dnaked%2Dunder%2Dthis%2Dburka</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://flickr.com/groups/topic/47601/"&gt;They hate Flickr for it&apos;s Freedom.&lt;/a&gt; An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.etisalat.co.ae/cgi-bin/search.cgi?Search=Flickr&amp;SearchDescription=1&amp;SearchTitle=1&amp;SearchContents=1&quot;&gt;ISP &lt;/a&gt;(and government controlled monopoly) in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/United-Arab-Emirates&quot;&gt;United Arab Emirates &lt;/a&gt;has decided to ban access to Flickr for it&apos;s citizens, apparently due to the complaints of a couple of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/forums/help/7814/page8/&quot;&gt;UAE expats &lt;/a&gt;in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/fdaitne/20872300/in/pool-uaefans/&quot;&gt;UK &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/chinookfoehn/18583077/&quot;&gt;Canada&lt;/a&gt;.  Of course, said blockage won&apos;t apply to them.  Most interestingly, they blame the rest of the world&apos;s non-flesh-fearing photographers as opposed to their ISP (and by proxy their own oppressive government.)  Now Flickr joins &lt;a href=&quot;http://engadget.com/entry/1234000420041288/&quot;&gt;Skype&lt;/a&gt;, AtomFilms, Friendster, AOL, and anything from Israels top-level domain, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/specialreportsNF.asp?ArticleID=151585&quot;&gt;outlawed content and services &lt;/a&gt;in the UAE (related study &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opennetinitiative.net/studies/uae/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  Well, if they don&apos;t care, why should we?  Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://linkfilter.net/?id=86988&quot;&gt;linkfilter&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42962</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:33:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arab</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>Flickr</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>nude</category>
		<category>nudity</category>
		<category>UAE</category>
		<category>wars</category>
		<dc:creator>rzklkng</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title> &quot;God&apos;s boys on both sides of the Atlantic&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21123/Gods%2Dboys%2Don%2Dboth%2Dsides%2Dof%2Dthe%2DAtlantic</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.americanvalues.org/html/can_we_coexist-press_release.html"&gt; &quot;God&apos;s boys on both sides of the Atlantic&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  It began back in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/15383&quot;&gt;February&lt;/a&gt;. Now, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanvalues.org/html/follow-up.html&quot;&gt;6 letters, 350+ intellectuals &lt;/a&gt;later, the great debate rages on,  though apparently and regrettably now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A8527-2002Oct24?language=printer&quot;&gt;censored in Saudi Arabia&lt;/a&gt;. Pity.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21123</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2002 07:56:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>jihad</category>
		<category>obl</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>saudi</category>
		<category>saudiarabia</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


