<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with JakobNielsen and design</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/JakobNielsen+design</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'JakobNielsen' and 'design' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 10:01:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 10:01:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14565/</link>
		<description> Jakob Nielsen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20020203.html&quot;&gt;believes&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/default.htm?fname=%20&amp;fsize=&quot;&gt;Cleartype&lt;/a&gt; can save you $2000/year. Um, yeah, Jakob.&lt;br /&gt;Go just for the experience of seeing the God of Ugly Design say, &quot;We desperately need better-looking computers...&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[link via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typographer.com&quot;&gt;typographer.com&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14565</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2002 10:01:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cleartype</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>jakobnielsen</category>
		<category>typography</category>
		<dc:creator>Su</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9526/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.useit.com"&gt;happy birthday jakob&lt;/a&gt; Though we all like to scream about his pronouncements or catch him when he makes an error in his own rules, it&apos;s time everyone who has a job relating to human factors to acknowledge that Jakob Nielsen&apos;s tireless promoting of usability is very likely the reason our bosses or our clients are willing to consider allowing usability testing. Thanks guy! Wish I could afford to &lt;a href=http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/wishlist/26JQ6PQQHD3T8/ref%3Dwl%5Frm%5Fbdwv/102-9336868-6495352&gt; buy you that rogers and hamerstein collection&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9526</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>birthday</category>
		<category>Denmark</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>JakobNielsen</category>
		<category>usability</category>
		<category>useit</category>
		<dc:creator>christina</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4335/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20001112.html"&gt;Gore good, pull down menus bad.&lt;/a&gt; Jakob no likey drop down menus.  I searched and could find no reference to the newest Alertbox.  It may not necessarily be a hot topic but I have to agree with Mr. Nielsen.  Pull down menus suck especially the ones created by CSS.  Web design should not try to function like an operating system interface or a republican political campaign.&lt;p&gt;Did I include enough politics for this post?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4335</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:30:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Alertbox</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>dropdown</category>
		<category>DropdownMenus</category>
		<category>JakobNielsen</category>
		<category>Nielsen</category>
		<category>usability</category>
		<category>UseIt</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>WebDesign</category>
		<dc:creator>Brilliantcrank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4006/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://anomy.net/useit.competition/"&gt;Redesign useit.com!&lt;/a&gt;  Think Jacob&apos;s site is a bit old school, fix it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4006</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:10:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>contests</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>jakobnielsen</category>
		<category>nielsen</category>
		<category>useit</category>
		<category>useit.com</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2215/</link>
		<description> Let web designers have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/&quot;&gt;Jakob Nielsen&lt;/a&gt; for usability guidance, we Flash designers have our own budding guru of usable Flash on the web at Flazoom.com. The guy behind Flazoom follows up his Cancer piece with some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flazoom.com/news/user_06202000.shtml&quot;&gt;good guidelines for Flash on the web&lt;/a&gt;. 

The best link in the article goes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.halliburton.com/BRS/BRSSRV/BRSSRV_engineering.asp&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, where he asks you to find both uses of Flash on the page. I totally missed the first one, even when I knew what to look for. His use of Flash that just blew me away - hardly any animation, just usefullness.

I&apos;ll stop cheering now...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2215</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 20:40:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>jakobnielsen</category>
		<category>nielsen</category>
		<category>usability</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<dc:creator>DragonBoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/433/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bigempty.com/"&gt;Here&apos;s something interesting,&lt;/a&gt; some real-world user interface guidelines for the web, without the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.useit.com/&apos;&gt;pompousness of that other guy&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.433</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 1999 20:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>jakobnielsen</category>
		<category>photographs</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>timgasperak</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/343/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/991114.html"&gt;Ugh! Jakob Nielsen is at it again,&lt;/a&gt; this time quantifying design conventions for the web. 
This quote of his stands out to me in a bad, bad way: &quot;Therefore, I recommend following the conventions even in those cases where a different design would be better if seen in isolation.&quot; Instead of pointing out the recipie for making a boring, slightly functional site, I wish he&apos;d stress alternatives to the emerging trends in corporate web site design.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.343</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1999 11:54:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>jakobnielsen</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>webdesign</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


