<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Java and microsoft</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Java+microsoft</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Java' and 'microsoft' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2002 07:34:28 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2002 07:34:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Microsoft like Tanya Harding</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22124/Microsoft%2Dlike%2DTanya%2DHarding</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/biztech/12/06/microsoft.sun.ap/index.html"&gt;Microsoft akin to Tanya Harding.&lt;/a&gt; So says U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz.  The crowbar wielding, knee popping company is also similar to baseball.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22124</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2002 07:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anticompetitive</category>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>Java</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Sun</category>
		<category>TonyaHarding</category>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15380/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/721268.asp"&gt;Microsoft must include Java with XP and IE.&lt;/a&gt; Sun sues Microsoft for including Java, then sues Microsoft for not including Java.  Fascinating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15380</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2002 11:06:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>Java</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Sun</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>milnak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13307/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t356-s2100934,00.html"&gt;ECMA ratifies C# as standard.&lt;/a&gt; In other news, Microsoft eats Sun&apos;s lunch. As Robert Cringely &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20011101.html&quot;&gt;puts it&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Now Java begins its slow decline as C# becomes dominant. I don&apos;t want it to be this way, but it deserves to be this way.&quot; Does it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13307</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 09:14:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>C#</category>
		<category>ECMA</category>
		<category>Java</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>gazingus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1326/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vnunet.com/News/601971"&gt;MS set to drop support for Java.&lt;/a&gt; Isn&apos;t it great that they are so committed to standards? I wonder if they&apos;ll change Jscript or heck, why not just drop ECMA all together?

ugh.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1326</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:00:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ecma</category>
		<category>java</category>
		<category>javascript</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>standards</category>
		<dc:creator>bryanboyer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


