<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with JohnStossel and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/JohnStossel+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'JohnStossel' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:43:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:43:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14758/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://boards.abcnews.go.com/cgi/abcnews/request.dll?LIST&amp;amp;room=stossel"&gt;Social Cruelty in Adults:  Does High School Ever End?&lt;/a&gt; An upcoming ABCNews Special with John Stossel (airing Friday) explores peer pressure, being in the &quot;in crowd&quot;, and the role that popularity plays not only during our years in the groves of academe but also in the professional workplace.  We&apos;ll see John&apos;s report on Friday, but I wish to redirect this discussion to the mefi crowd:  Were you in the &quot;in crowd&quot; during your high school/collegiate years or on the outside looking in?  Did it even matter, and if it did, how and in what way?  Has it played a distinct role in the person who you feel you&apos;ve become?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14758</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:43:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abc</category>
		<category>abcnews</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cruelty</category>
		<category>highschool</category>
		<category>incrowd</category>
		<category>johnstossel</category>
		<category>outsiders</category>
		<category>peerpressure</category>
		<category>popularity</category>
		<dc:creator>iceblink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8709/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/stossel_010629_tamperingwithnature.html"&gt;Humans Good!&lt;/a&gt; Finally...a report on a major TV network that presents (dare I say it?) the truth about progress, technology, and human nature, and eco-terrorists are portrayed in the scathing light of reality.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8709</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:33:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>20-20</category>
		<category>ABCNews</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>EcoTerrorism</category>
		<category>JohnStossel</category>
		<category>Stossel</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>davidmsc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5571/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020Friday_010119_stosselgoestowash.html"&gt;Government waste.&lt;/a&gt; While the report had very &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lp.org/issues/welfare.html&quot;&gt;libertarian&lt;/a&gt; leanings, John Stossel&apos;s special on how royally inept our government is at accomplishing &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt; is an indictment of the entrenched ways of doing things. There &lt;b&gt;must&lt;/b&gt; be some sort of crossroad where liberal social policies can meet with real accountability without bureaucracy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5571</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:48:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bureaucracy</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>johnstossel</category>
		<category>stossel</category>
		<category>waste</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2809/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ewg.org/"&gt;John Stossel Reprimanded but not Fired by ABC&lt;/a&gt;  - It is not exactly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fair.org/media-outlets/stossel.html&quot;&gt;new information&lt;/a&gt; that Stossel has a habit of distorting facts and misleading the public. However, in this case he apparently thought he could get away with fabricating two complete sets of lab results related to food safety. Willingly disseminating false health information strikes me as a serious breach of journalistic ethics. In any case, ABC thinks a slap on the wrist will suffice, and tonight Stossel is expected to make an on-air apology. Will he admit he lied or blame an intern?   
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2809</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 02:52:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABC</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>JohnStossel</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>lying</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<dc:creator>johnb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


