- Given Saddam Hussein's central place in the American Consciousness over the last couple decades and particularly in recent years, I found 60 minutes' interview with FBI interrogator
George Piro pretty fascinating.
"You Don't Understand Our Audience"
--what John Hockenberry (formerly of NBC, now at MIT Media Lab
) learned about network news--good guys and bad guys, the "emotional center", synergy, facts, and why fewer and fewer watch nowadays.
Pentagon Flunky Misplaces 9/11 Talking Points at Starbucks
A Pentagon employee left documents
with talking points to help Donald Rumsfeld deal with questions about 9/11 on Sunday political chat shows. The employee is almost certainly due to get fired, because the documents even included a hand-drawn map to Donald Rumsfeld's house! (Note: documents in pdf file.)
An Editorial from Jane's, 9/11: in search of context and meaning
"Fiction, non-fiction, news, news analysis and opinion... And unfortunately we continually mix and merge these groupings, using them in similar ways and often believing them to contain similar weight and importance." "We now tend to respond to the news rather than attempting to get behind it and create policy."
Arundhati Roy on the tragedy.
The most eloquent and thoughtful essay I've read so far. Coincidentally, about the only good journamlism I've encountered on the subject has been from British and French press.
SNL Producer declares Bush "off limits,"
despite what it says in the link. In the wake of the Bill Maher crucifixion
, Lorne Michaels
has decided to play it safe, according to the paragon of journalism
. Does this mean no airport metal detector skit?
The Washington Post calls it "An Attack on the World."
In addition, the London Times has a graphic
of a world map that shows the number of people killed in last week's attacks from other countries.
Suspects 'caught crashes on camera'
Five men suspected of being involved in the attack on the World Trade Centre set up cameras to record the atrocity.
The Examiner spells it out.
As a newspaper page designer (for a much smaller, tamer paper), I wonder what you all think of the San Francisco Examiner's semi-profane but heartfelt front-page headline. On one hand, it's editorializing, but on the other, it expresses what an awful lot of people are thinking. I think I like it, but I also know it'd never get printed in a lot of papers, including my own.
'Oh my God they are jumping.'
The British press covers the attacks with an emphasis on the people who jumped [graphic photo advisory
]. I noticed the same thing watching BBC World on cable Tuesday -- is the U.S. press showing restraint with images like this?
"I've been a broadcast journalist for a quarter of a century and I've never seen a slower period
... There is really no comparison in our lifetime." Are we facing The End of News? Will we ever again live in interesting times? (Yes, I know it's a Salon link. But I've been thinking about this for a while.)