Join 3,555 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)

4 posts tagged with Journalism by aaron.
Displaying 1 through 4 of 4.

Related tags:
+ (174)
+ (126)
+ (79)
+ (67)
+ (65)
+ (61)
+ (54)
+ (52)
+ (44)
+ (40)
+ (34)
+ (34)
+ (32)
+ (29)
+ (29)
+ (28)
+ (28)
+ (28)
+ (27)
+ (27)
+ (26)
+ (25)
+ (24)
+ (24)
+ (21)
+ (21)
+ (21)
+ (21)
+ (21)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (18)
+ (17)
+ (17)
+ (17)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (12)


Users that often use this tag:
zarq (28)
reenum (15)
homunculus (11)
Potomac Avenue (11)
the man of twists ... (11)
mediareport (9)
netbros (9)
Horace Rumpole (9)
mathowie (8)
Postroad (8)
adamvasco (8)
AceRock (8)
kliuless (7)
chunking express (7)
Trurl (7)
owillis (6)
feelinglistless (6)
stbalbach (6)
Blazecock Pileon (6)
The Whelk (6)
insomnia_lj (5)
matteo (5)
dejah420 (5)
ibmcginty (5)
klangklangston (5)
Artw (5)
roomthreeseventeen (5)
IvoShandor (5)
MiguelCardoso (4)
amberglow (4)
aaron (4)
skallas (4)
solistrato (4)
soyjoy (4)
madamjujujive (4)
Kattullus (4)
troutfishing (4)
digaman (4)
four panels (4)
hortense (4)
jeffburdges (4)
Pope Guilty (4)
Joe Beese (4)
gilrain (4)
anemone of the state (4)
joeclark (3)
palegirl (3)
holgate (3)
rcade (3)
semmi (3)
thisisdrew (3)
Tlogmer (3)
boost ventilator (3)
fold_and_mutilate (3)
whir (3)
4easypayments (3)
hoder (3)
timsteil (3)
plep (3)
Gyan (3)

Is this Andrew Sullivan's ass?

Is this Andrew Sullivan's ass? This morning, Jim Romenesko made a questionable publishing decision. He ran a link to an article in last Friday's edition of the newspaper LGNY, in which Michelangelo Signorile makes a very serious allegation: That Andrew Sullivan has been advertising for "bareback" sex online (anal sex w/o condoms). Such actions on Sullivan's part would be seen by many as exceedingly hypocritical given his voluminous writings of a moral conservative bent and his "arrogance toward the ghettoized gay scene" (as Signorile puts it), if not downright dangerous given his HIV+ status.

If true, this brings up plenty of ideological and moral issues, which I'm sure will be discussed in this thread. But that's not why I'm bringing it up here. I'm posting because of the vaguely Kayceeish nature of the whole thing. If you look at Signorile's article, you'll see that all the evidence is circumstantial. Several people who Signorile really really trust say they answered the ads and Sullivan was the guy that showed up when they met. The photos in the ads look like what most people expect Sullivan's body to look like (minus his head, of course). Also, Sullivan hasn't responded to anyone's questions about this, and after all, if the accusations were false wouldn't Sullivan be loudly denying them (wink wink)?

Complicating the whole mess is Signorile's own journalistic history - he made his name during the late '80s-early '90s running gossipy columns outing famous people against their will - and that Romenesko decided to publicize this article in the first place, thus ensuring that every single person in the national media is fully aware of the allegations, true or not. Is this actual proof that Sullivan is guilty of barebacking, or is he being Borked (Kayceed?)? Should it have been publicized like this in the first place, since a mention in Romenesko is the best way to start up a classic pack journalism action short of running a front-page story in The New York Times? Will other media outlets jump on this now and sully Sullivan's reputation, whether the allegations are true or not?
posted by aaron on May 29, 2001 - 41 comments


CueCats Held Hostage!

CueCats Held Hostage! A motley mix of left-wingers and computer geeks plans to march on the offices of the Dallas Morning News this weekend, armed with pet carriers filled with CueCats, in order to protest what they see as pro-GOP slants in the paper's reporting. If the paper doesn't agree to their demands for more left-favorable reporting, the CueCats will be executed! Why CueCats? Because the company that owns the News has been plugging CueCats like crazy. (second item on the page)
posted by aaron on Dec 14, 2000 - 3 comments

"I've been a broadcast journalist for a quarter of a century and I've never seen a slower period ... There is really no comparison in our lifetime." Are we facing The End of News? Will we ever again live in interesting times? (Yes, I know it's a Salon link. But I've been thinking about this for a while.)
posted by aaron on Sep 11, 2000 - 8 comments

Three good pieces from the Sunday Times: New York as viewed through foreign tourist guidebooks (big surprise, the French books are the ones that spend the most time pointing out American inferiority). Jerry Nachman on journalists' overwhelmingly one-sided ideology and their rapidly-decreasing ability to hide it. And Michael Lewis on how TiVo and Replay are going to destroy television as we know it, eek! (And don't miss the videos showing how they blew up the TVs and Kellogg's boxes to get the photographs that accompany the article.)

I don't think the Nachman link will live beyond 11 pm Eastern on Sunday; I couldn't find a longer-lasting link to it. I guess opinion pieces aren't important to the Times.
posted by aaron on Aug 12, 2000 - 11 comments


Page: 1