<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with JudicialWatch</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/JudicialWatch</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'JudicialWatch' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:20:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:20:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>...action has been coordinated with VP&apos;s office...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52336/action%2Dhas%2Dbeen%2Dcoordinated%2Dwith%2DVPs%2Doffice</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Documents_suggest_Army_lied_about_Cheney_0615.html"&gt;&quot;I am copying you on this crap since I honestly believe the competitive procurement will never happen.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; --a multi-billion-dollar no-bid contract to KBR/Halliburton announced only after the fact, Cheney&apos;s extensive involvement, the attempted coverup of that involvement, lies, and you. &lt;i&gt;Embarrassment is not sufficient cause for exemption&lt;/i&gt; from the Freedom of Information Act, no matter how much some may wish. &lt;a href=&quot;http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:WwBLj5dMO8AJ:www.house.gov/appropriations_democrats/pdf/2006-3-8-truman-committee-final.pdf+%2260+minutes%22+KBR+Cheney&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=9&amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt;...Appearing on NBC&#8217;s Meet the Press in September 2003 Cheney stated,
&#8220;I have absolutely no influence of, involvement of, knowledge of in any way, shape or form of contracts led by the [Army] Corps of Engineers or anybody else in the Federal Government.&#8221;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52336</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:20:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>Feith</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Halliburton</category>
		<category>House</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>JudicialWatch</category>
		<category>KBR</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>VP</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>White</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Watchdog&apos;s Bark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27068/Watchdogs%2DBark</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.b_PR.shtml"&gt;Watchdog&apos;s Bark&lt;/a&gt; Judicial Watch, the group that&apos;s been suing for access to Cheney&apos;s Energy Task Force notes, finally gets some docs, and guess what? Way back in 2001, Cheney, et al, were looking at maps of Iraqi oil fields. Is this the bookend clue, that coupled with Rumsfields 9/12 comments about going after Iraq, starts to shed real light on the administrations foreign policy objectives?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27068</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:30:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>dickcheney</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>judicialwatch</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<dc:creator>tellmenow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


