<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with LDS and Utah</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/LDS+Utah</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'LDS' and 'Utah' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:41:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:41:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20681/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20021009_2218.html"&gt;Sorry, Big Brother.&lt;/a&gt; Appeals court says &lt;a href=&quot;http://lds.org&quot;&gt;Mormon Church&lt;/a&gt; can&apos;t restrict speech on sidewalks of Salt Lake City Plaza. &lt;i&gt;&quot;The city cannot create a &apos;First Amendment-free zone.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; This comes punctually after allegations that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sltrib.com/bagley/Archive.asp?Vol=content&amp;Num=6&quot;&gt;LDS&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sltrib.com/2002/sep/09182002/utah/182280.htm&quot;&gt;security&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slweekly.com/editorial/2002/city_2_2002-10-03.cfm&quot;&gt;harrassed&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sltrib.com/2002/Sep/09222002/Sunday/236.htm&quot;&gt;evangelical&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,405031569,00.html&quot;&gt;volunteers&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20681</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:41:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>lds</category>
		<category>mormon</category>
		<category>utah</category>
		<dc:creator>aaronshaf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16230/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sltrib.com/04092002/utah/726835.htm"&gt;Two men arrested for handing out anti-Mormon literature.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&apos; and Salt Lake City&apos;s restrictions on behavior they deem &quot;offensive&quot; on the plaza are now the subject of an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit before the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.&quot; ... &quot;The deed made it clear it [the plaza] was not a First Amendment forum...&quot; Does the ACLU have a good case?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16230</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 20:32:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aclu</category>
		<category>lds</category>
		<category>mormonism</category>
		<category>mormons</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>utah</category>
		<dc:creator>aaronshaf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7058/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0104.mencimer.html"&gt;Theocracy in America?&lt;/a&gt; Specifically, in Utah, according to the writer of this &lt;i&gt;Washington Monthly&lt;/i&gt; piece, who grew up there. Is the article too harsh, though, given the author&apos;s apparent lingering bitterness regarding her upbringing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7058</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:56:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>essay</category>
		<category>LatterDaySaints</category>
		<category>LDS</category>
		<category>Mormons</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<category>TheMormons</category>
		<category>theocracy</category>
		<category>Utah</category>
		<category>WashingtonMonthly</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5226/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/sex/world/2001/01/11/mormon/index.html"&gt;A modern Dr Bowdler...&lt;/a&gt; (yeah, I know it&apos;s Salon, but...) A video-rental store in Utah offers &quot;cleaned up&quot; versions of modern films. First thought: is it legal? Post-DeCSS, one would think not: after all, the MPAA has done its best to protect its right to control the manner of reproduction. But are the studios not jumping to litigate, because they&apos;re happier to alienate Linux users with DVD drives than the LDS contingent in UT?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5226</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:20:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bowdler</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>decss</category>
		<category>dvds</category>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>lds</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>mormons</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>mpaa</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>utah</category>
		<category>videos</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


