<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Labor and women</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Labor+women</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Labor' and 'women' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 08:42:25 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 08:42:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>India&apos;s reproductive assembly line</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/116096/Indias%2Dreproductive%2Dassembly%2Dline</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&apos;http://contexts.org/articles/dev/spring-2012/indias-reproductive-assembly-line/&apos;&gt;&lt;i&gt;If you asked me two years ago whether I&#8217;d have a baby and give it away for money, I wouldn&#8217;t just laugh at you, I would be so insulted I might hit you in the face,&#8221; said Indirani, a 30-year old garment worker and gestational surrogate mother. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.116096</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 08:42:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bangalore</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>india</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>pregnancy</category>
		<category>pregnant</category>
		<category>surrogacy</category>
		<category>surrogate</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<dc:creator>latkes</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>88 cents for the same job</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/113665/88%2Dcents%2Dfor%2Dthe%2Dsame%2Djob</link>
		<description> Just in time for &lt;a href=&quot;http://internationalwomensday.com/&quot;&gt;International Womens Day&lt;/a&gt;, it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://narrowthegapp.com/&quot;&gt;Narrow the Gap&lt;/a&gt;, a look at the unbalanced payrolls of American workers based on US Department of Labor statistics from a variety of industries.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.113665</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:32:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>genderequality</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<category>workforce</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Progesterone Gel Helps Prevent Preemies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/102344/Progesterone%2DGel%2DHelps%2DPrevent%2DPreemies</link>
		<description> One in every 8 babies born in the US is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdc.gov/features/prematurebirth/&quot;&gt;premature&lt;/a&gt;. A new &lt;a href=&quot;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.9017/pdf&quot;&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(pdf/&lt;a href=&quot;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291469-0705/accepted&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt; published online Wednesday in &lt;em&gt;Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology&lt;/em&gt; indicates that vaginal progesterone gel can help women who are pregnant for the first time and at risk of premature birth &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=new-hope-for-preventing-pre-term-bi-2011-04-08&quot;&gt;extend their pregnancies, reduce potential complications and boost the health of their newborns&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/short/2011/407/1?rss=1&amp;q=mednews_jd&quot;&gt;&quot;In women with a short cervix during the second trimester of pregnancy, use of a vaginal progesterone gel essentially halves the risk for preterm birth,&lt;/a&gt; according to an NIH- and industry-funded study published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

Previous, smaller-scale studies had produced &lt;a href=&quot;http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2007/802/2?q=pfw&quot;&gt;conflicting, disparate results.&lt;/a&gt;  The new study involved &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/progesterone-gel-lowers-the-risk-of-preterm-delivery-in-pregnant-women-with-a-short-cervix/2011/04/06/AFl7YmuC_story.html&quot;&gt;32,000 pregnant women in the United States and nine other countries. &lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.102344</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:12:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>babies</category>
		<category>baby</category>
		<category>birth</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>drug</category>
		<category>fetus</category>
		<category>gel</category>
		<category>infant</category>
		<category>injections</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>makena</category>
		<category>medication</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>mother</category>
		<category>motherhood</category>
		<category>parenthood</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>preemie</category>
		<category>preemies</category>
		<category>pregnancy</category>
		<category>premature</category>
		<category>prochieve</category>
		<category>progesterone</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>study</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Department of Labor eliminating women&apos;s bureau?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13703/Department%2Dof%2DLabor%2Deliminating%2Dwomens%2Dbureau</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dol.gov/dol/wb/public/info_about_wb/interwb.htm"&gt;Department of Labor eliminating women&apos;s bureau?&lt;/a&gt; Posted on the  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cwa-legis-pol.org/legalert/alert_WomensbureauClosings.htm&quot;&gt;CWA &lt;/a&gt;site is some info on how the Bush Administration is trying to close all of the regional offices of the Women&apos;s Bureau at the Labor Department.  

I guess, since we&apos;re being &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dol.gov/dol/wb/public/wb_pubs/wagegaptext2.htm&quot;&gt;paid almost 73% &lt;/a&gt;of what men are, we should be grateful and assume that this 80 year institution has done all it can do for women?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13703</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:16:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>CWA</category>
		<category>employment</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


