<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Lawsuit and Trial</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Lawsuit+Trial</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Lawsuit' and 'Trial' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:01:35 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:01:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>No Such Thing as a Free Lunch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65288/No%2DSuch%2DThing%2Das%2Da%2DFree%2DLunch</link>
		<description> [Newsfilter]:  Fighting a recording industry lawsuit for file sharing saying &quot;it wasn&apos;t me!&quot; is probably a really, really bad idea.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.startribune.com/467/story/1464264.html&quot;&gt;Jury awards recording companies $222,000 for willfully infringing the copyright on 24 songs in first-to-trial file sharing lawsuit.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65288</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:01:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>First</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>To</category>
		<category>Trial</category>
		<dc:creator>Muddler</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14089/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/~jwhite/tunney.html"&gt;Fed Up? Happy? Excited?&lt;/a&gt; Step right up and add your comments to the Microsoft Antitrust Trial.  Due to the Tunney Act, all of us have the right to comment on the proceedings. The comment period closes Monday morning (the 28th) so if you have an opinion, and we know everyone here does, email/snail mail/call the DOJ.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14089</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 05:23:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>trial</category>
		<dc:creator>plemeljr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13381/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=law/View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=ZZZDLY2UPVC&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;cst=1&amp;amp;pc=3&amp;amp;pa=0&amp;amp;s=News&amp;amp;ExpIgnore=true&amp;amp;showsummary=0"&gt;Court TV Seeks to Broadcast Moussaoui Trial.  &lt;/a&gt; The Senate has passed a bill allowing for the closed circuit televising (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courttv.com/casefiles/oklahoma/documents/govcirc.html&quot; title=&quot;May 1, 1996 brief, the government asks that closed-circuit television be set up for Oklahoma City bombing victims and their family members&quot;&gt;similar to that used in the case against McVeigh and Nichols&lt;/a&gt;) of the trial in this case to a number of locations for victims of the crimes associated with the terrorist acts of September 11th, who have an interest in attending, but can not do so because of inconvenience and expense.  Federal rules prohibit TV cameras in the courtroom, but Court TV argues that the prohibition is unconstitutional.  Television coverage has come a long way from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=381&amp;invol=532&quot; title=&quot;Estes v. Texas&quot;&gt;first case involving the impact of radio and television broadcasting&lt;/a&gt; before the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in an overturned conviction.   Should cameras be allowed in the courtroom, and if they are, will they &lt;a href=&quot;http://tlhsrv3.flabar.org/RHandbook01.nsf/1119bd38ae090a748525676f0053b606/5192d3660a0dd573852569cb004c8e15?OpenDocument&quot; title=&quot;see this article&apos;s sections on the historical perspective of courtroom media coverage and on federal courtrooms&quot;&gt; shape the outcome of the trial?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13381</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2001 22:55:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CourtTV</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Moussaoui</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>trial</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>bragadocchio</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3641/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-3153207.html"&gt;Some people don&apos;t know when to keep their mouths shut.&lt;/a&gt; You&apos;d think a judge of such long experience would know better. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/13830.html&quot;&gt;Also this.&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3641</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:01:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>judge</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>misconduct</category>
		<category>trial</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


