<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Lawsuit and USA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Lawsuit+USA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Lawsuit' and 'USA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:07:32 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:07:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Nader sues Democratic Party for conspiring against democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66090/Nader%2Dsues%2DDemocratic%2DParty%2Dfor%2Dconspiring%2Dagainst%2Ddemocracy</link>
		<description> Yesterday, Ralph Nader sued the Democratic Party for conspiring to prevent him from running for president in 2004. The lawsuit alleges that defendants used &#8220;groundless and abusive litigation&#8221; to bankrupt Ralph Nader&#8217;s campaign and force him off the ballot in 18 states, and names as co-defendants the Kerry-Edwards campaign, the Service Employees International Union, private law firms, and organizations like the Ballot Project and America Coming Together that were created to promote voter turnout on behalf of the Democratic ticket. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/31/145208&quot;&gt;attorney Carl Mayer from the team that filed the suit, interviewed this morning by &lt;em&gt;Democracy Now!&lt;/em&gt;&apos;s Amy Goodman&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;&quot;what this lawsuit will do, and the importance of it is, is to set a precedent so that the two-party monopoly system that shuts out minor parties in a way that other Western democracies never do, that this will set a precedent to prevent this type of intimidation and harassment.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66090</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:07:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>duopoly</category>
		<category>kerry</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>nader</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>finite</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What is the sound of a &quot;No Hearing Hearing&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46908/What%2Dis%2Dthe%2Dsound%2Dof%2Da%2DNo%2DHearing%2DHearing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=280&amp;amp;Itemid=51"&gt;California holds a &quot;No Hearing Hearing&quot; on Diebold certification.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;In June, over 200 people traveled to Sacramento to voice their concerns at a public hearing before a panel of advisors to the Secretary of State on voting systems. Since then, every scheduled meeting of the Voting Systems Panel has been cancelled, and now the Secretary has simply disbanded the VSP without notice, without hearings, without any type of due process.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

This isn&apos;t the only jurisdiction in which Diebold is attempting to circumvent legal requirements - in North Carolina they  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/368895.html&quot;&gt;filed for and received a broad exemption from new disclosure rules&lt;/a&gt; recently passed into law.  The EFF are now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2005_11.php#004171&quot;&gt;suing to force Diebold to comply with the law&lt;/a&gt;.

As if that wasn&apos;t enough, an official &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbvdocs.org/reports/freeman.pdf&quot;&gt;Certification Test&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) for Diebold&apos;s Optical Scan voting machines confirms an earlier &lt;a href=&quot;http://vote.nist.gov/threats/papers/ReplaceableMediaOnOpticalScan.pdf&quot;&gt;threat analysis test&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) that the memory cards on these machines run uncertified and arbitrary executable code, a charge that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/14296.html&quot;&gt;Diebold has vigorously denied&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46908</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:58:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>diebold</category>
		<category>eff</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>integrity</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>transparency</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>dinsdale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Aid and comfort?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28638/Aid%2Dand%2Dcomfort</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/press_release0929.html"&gt;Anti-sanctions group sanctioned.&lt;/a&gt; Anti Iraq-sanctions group Voices in the Wilderness is being &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/pages/newPages/SBsummonsdocument.html&quot;&gt;sued&lt;/a&gt; by the U.S. Department of Justice for bringing relief supplies to Iraq before the war. ViTW has issued an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/pages/newPages/SBsummons_response1.html&quot;&gt;initial response&lt;/a&gt; and filed an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/press_release0929.html&quot;&gt;answer and counterclaim&lt;/a&gt;. Does the DoJ have a leg to stand on? What moral and legal obligations do we have to refrain from giving aid and comfort to &quot;enemy&quot; civilians? How about if they live in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/examiner/archive/1999/12/05/TRAVEL13148.dtl&quot;&gt;sunny Cuba&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28638</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:25:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>civilian</category>
		<category>cuba</category>
		<category>DOJ</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>relief</category>
		<category>sanctions</category>
		<category>supplies</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>vitw</category>
		<category>voicesinthewilderness</category>
		<dc:creator>stonerose</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19614/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/dailynews/239/politics/Florida_counties_plan_to_settl:.shtml"&gt;Florida to settle 2000 election lawsuit.&lt;/a&gt; Major provisions include a promise for massive reforms in voter registration, voter-roll maintenance and polling practices, as part of the lawsuit pushed by the NAACP.  Granted, it&apos;s good that a large angered group is &quot;getting over it&quot; as many (even on this board) have still been explaining, but should skeptics (read: Democrats) such as myself read the Florida legislature&apos;s desire to settle as a sign that they may not have thought they would have won against charges of rigging the election?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19614</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 09:49:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>NAACP</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15833/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020326/ts_nm/rights_slavery_lawsuit_dc_4&amp;amp;printer=1"&gt;Reparations Sought From U.S. Firms for Slavery.&lt;/a&gt; Big U.S. companies were named in a lawsuit on Tuesday filed on behalf of black Americans descended from slaves, the first-ever class action seeking reparations from firms for profiting from slavery. Is this really sensible?
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15833</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:35:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>classaction</category>
		<category>companies</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>reparations</category>
		<category>slavey</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>sixdifferentways</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8617/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010626/wl/aids_un_dc.html"&gt;US drops WTO lawsuit &lt;/a&gt; against Brazil for producing generic anti-AIDS drugs while UN nations&apos; contributions to African AIDS relief falls short of Annan&apos;s proposed 10 billion war chest.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8617</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:11:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WTO</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5176/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0102/hentoff.shtml"&gt;Nat Hentoff on the Supreme Court and &lt;i&gt;Bush v Gore:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Far from stealing the election for Bush, the majority of the Supreme Court shamed the politicians of both parties who, for so long, have failed to secure everyone&apos;s meaningful right to vote.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5176</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:03:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>VillageVoice</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4779/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.monickels.com/images/bushwins.jpg"&gt;Bush apparently wins...&lt;/a&gt; and the New York Times is apparently speechless. &lt;i&gt;54k&lt;/i&gt; &lt;font size=-2&gt;&lt;br&gt;(The &lt;a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/13/politics/13CND-ELECT.html&gt;original&lt;/a&gt; page has already changed; please forgive the link to the image on my site.)&lt;/font&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4779</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:17:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Mo Nickels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4723/</link>
		<description> &lt;B&gt;&lt;i&gt;Supreme Court II: Election Boogaloo.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; Programs, getcher programs here! Thanks to the wonders of the Internet, you can get your grubby hands on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/election2000/uscbushbrf1210.pdf&quot;&gt;Bush&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/supremecourt/goremerits.fdf&quot;&gt;Gore&lt;/a&gt; briefs right now. Fascinating reading. PDF files, of course.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4723</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2000 21:26:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>recount</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


