<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Lawsuit and brokenlink</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Lawsuit+brokenlink</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Lawsuit' and 'brokenlink' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:40:56 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:40:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Class action CD lawsuitchecks mailed.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31398/Class%2Daction%2DCD%2Dlawsuitchecks%2Dmailed</link>
		<description> &lt;i&gt;As Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, I am pleased to enclose payment for your claim in the settlement of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://musiccdsettlement.com/&quot;&gt;Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust Litigation&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Checks have gone out to people who &quot;purchased prerecorded Music Products, consisting of compact discs, cassettes and vinyl albums, from one or more retailers during the period January 1, 1995, through December 22, 2000.&quot; Mine was for $13.86. I think I&apos;ll go buy an indie CD.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31398</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:40:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CD</category>
		<category>CDs</category>
		<category>checks</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>pricefixing</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>settlement</category>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>MikeRoweSoft Settles with Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30961/MikeRoweSoft%2DSettles%2Dwith%2DMicrosoft</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-5147374.html?tag=nefd_top"&gt;MikeRoweSoft Settles with Microsoft for an XBox&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Mike Rowe had a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mikerowesoft.com/&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt; named after himself that was alot like the mega-corp.&lt;br&gt;
MS wanted to give him $10 to change the domain, he wanted $10k. They settled on a trip to Redmond, some traffic redirection and an XBox.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Followup to this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/30800&quot;&gt;thread&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30961</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:57:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>followup</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>MikeRowe</category>
		<category>MikeRoweSoft</category>
		<category>settlement</category>
		<category>student</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<category>Xbox</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Man Giveth, the Church Taketh, Whateth Be the Problem?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30717/Man%2DGiveth%2Dthe%2DChurch%2DTaketh%2DWhateth%2DBe%2Dthe%2DProblem</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/breaking_news/7699643.htm"&gt;Man Wants Church Donation Back&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;A man, in the midst of a serious bout of depression, gives away almost his entire life savings, $126,000, to a local church. He later realizes that this was not the smartest thing to do. He asks the church for the money back. The church, not surprisingly, says they&apos;ve already spent it and so he can&apos;t have it back. &lt;br&gt;
What&apos;s next?&lt;br&gt;
Bust out the lawyers!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30717</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:59:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>church</category>
		<category>donation</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Death of Indymedia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29186/The%2DDeath%2Dof%2DIndymedia</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.indymedia.org/"&gt;Indymedia to cease operations.&lt;/a&gt; Sure, it&apos;s not announced just yet on their homepage.  You have to go &lt;a href=&quot;http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=8694_Indymedia_Libels_Me_Again#comments&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; to find out why.  A hint: they &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; screenshots of this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=357581&amp;group=webcast&quot;&gt;trash post&lt;/a&gt; on the usually very trash commentboards of a fine idea of a website.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29186</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:20:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Indymedia</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>LGF</category>
		<category>libel</category>
		<category>LittleGreenFootballs</category>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Aid and comfort?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28638/Aid%2Dand%2Dcomfort</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/press_release0929.html"&gt;Anti-sanctions group sanctioned.&lt;/a&gt; Anti Iraq-sanctions group Voices in the Wilderness is being &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/pages/newPages/SBsummonsdocument.html&quot;&gt;sued&lt;/a&gt; by the U.S. Department of Justice for bringing relief supplies to Iraq before the war. ViTW has issued an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/pages/newPages/SBsummons_response1.html&quot;&gt;initial response&lt;/a&gt; and filed an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/press_release0929.html&quot;&gt;answer and counterclaim&lt;/a&gt;. Does the DoJ have a leg to stand on? What moral and legal obligations do we have to refrain from giving aid and comfort to &quot;enemy&quot; civilians? How about if they live in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/examiner/archive/1999/12/05/TRAVEL13148.dtl&quot;&gt;sunny Cuba&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28638</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:25:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>civilian</category>
		<category>cuba</category>
		<category>DOJ</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>relief</category>
		<category>sanctions</category>
		<category>supplies</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>vitw</category>
		<category>voicesinthewilderness</category>
		<dc:creator>stonerose</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Metallica sues over use of E, F chords.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27035/Metallica%2Dsues%2Dover%2Duse%2Dof%2DE%2DF%2Dchords</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www1.scoopthis.com/411/met_uf/stc_met_uf_mtv.htm"&gt;Metallica sues over use of E, F chords.&lt;/a&gt; No, it&apos;s not an Onion article. Really. They&apos;re completely serious. No exaggerating is taking place here. Honestly, they really are suing another band for using the E and F chords. It&apos;s on their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www1.scoopthis.com/411/met_uf/stc_met_uf.htm&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;, for god&apos;s sake. All I know is, I&apos;m getting drunk tonight.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27035</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 01:12:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BrokenLink</category>
		<category>chords</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<dc:creator>tweebiscuit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>*MichaelSavageFilter*</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26653/MichaelSavageFilter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nealpollack.com/cgi-bin/blog/do.cgi/200306102329/permalink"&gt;Hey everybody,&lt;/a&gt; it&apos;s &lt;q&gt;Appropriate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michaelsavage.com/&quot;&gt;Michael Savage&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s name for your own purposes&lt;/q&gt; day! With contributions from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haypenny.com/archive/dailyarchive/garrett/030626.html&quot;&gt;Haypenny&lt;/a&gt;,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://uber.nu/docs/do.cgi/20030625&quot;&gt;&amp;#0252;ber&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nealpollack.com/cgi-bin/blog/do.cgi/200306251458/permalink&quot;&gt;Neal Pollack&lt;/a&gt; himself, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nealpollack.com/cgi-bin/blog/do.cgi/200306261316/permalink&quot;&gt;much&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nealpollack.com/cgi-bin/blog/do.cgi/200306261126/permalink&quot;&gt;much&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nealpollack.com/cgi-bin/blog/do.cgi/200306260955/permalink&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;, all in response to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/06/11/1643219&amp;mode=thread&amp;tid=11&quot;&gt;these threats&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26653</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:55:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>criticism</category>
		<category>critics</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>MichaelSavage</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>kickingtheground</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Blair Hornstine Project</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26212/The%2DBlair%2DHornstine%2DProject</link>
		<description> Remember Blair Hornstine? Her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/25576&quot;&gt;$2.5 million lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; against her high school for not naming her valedictorian &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/25678&quot;&gt;resulted in an injunction&lt;/a&gt; and the sole possession of the title. Now it gets worse: she has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/6017163.htm&quot;&gt;Jayson Blair problem.&lt;/a&gt; Several of her contributions to local papers were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/ny-bc-nj--valedictorian-exc0604jun04,0,7747250.story?coll=ny-ap-regional-wire&quot;&gt;lifted from presidential speeches, Supreme Court opinions, and editorials.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26212</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2003 07:25:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blairhornstine</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>highschool</category>
		<category>hornstine</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>plagiarism</category>
		<category>schools</category>
		<category>valedictorian</category>
		<dc:creator>PrinceValium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>About freaking time</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26115/About%2Dfreaking%2Dtime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/21361"&gt;Remember the Coastal Records Project?&lt;/a&gt; When I first heard about this, I applauded, then wasted a couple of hours looking at the nice pics.  But I couldn&apos;t help wondering when they&apos;d run into some compound of a celebrity who&apos;d put up a stink (okay, I was hoping it would be Ah-nold, and there&apos;d be a scene reminiscent of his movies, stinger missile launched from his patio at the helicopter...) alas, it&apos;s only &lt;a href=&quot;http://entertainment.msn.com/news/article.aspx?news=124007&quot;&gt;Barbara.&lt;/a&gt;  Still, does this only make me wonder if our celebrities are helping push through laws to establish themselves in a higher class than us peons?  Please note that the irony of rich people suing each other isn&apos;t lost on me, and I&apos;m not trying to put forward that it could be any one of us touring in a helicopter doing this.  

But I mean, the guy&apos;s taking picture&apos;s of the whole coast, not just some star-map, coastline version.  Until this lawsuit, I&apos;d wager, only the most dedicated stalker would&apos;ve known this was her place.  But now...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26115</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:28:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BarbraStreisand</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Californation</category>
		<category>CoastalRecordsProject</category>
		<category>coastlines</category>
		<category>helicopter</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<dc:creator>Busithoth</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Death of Netscape?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26099/The%2DDeath%2Dof%2DNetscape</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2003/05/29/technology/microsoft/index.htm"&gt;AOL and Microsoft settle AOL&apos;s Netscape lawsuit.&lt;/a&gt; AOL gets $750 million and keeps IE as its default browser for seven years. Is this the &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatdoiknow.org/archives/000981.php&quot;&gt;death of Netscape&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26099</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2003 09:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>BrokenLink</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>Lawsuit</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Netscape</category>
		<dc:creator>timeistight</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Music Industry looses in court</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25382/Music%2DIndustry%2Dlooses%2Din%2Dcourt</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/04/25/national1747EDT0700.DTL"&gt;Federal judge rules Morpheus, Grokster not liable for Internet piracy.&lt;/a&gt; Well that is until the big pocketed music industry finds a favorable judge and wins the appeal.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25382</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 20:42:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>doublepost</category>
		<category>Grokster</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Morpheus</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>peer-to-peer</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lynne Cheney parody draws White House ire</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24093/Lynne%2DCheney%2Dparody%2Ddraws%2DWhite%2DHouse%2Dire</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tribnet.com/24hour/entertainment/story/794376p-5674411c.html"&gt;Lynne Cheney parody draws White House ire&lt;/a&gt; An Internet lampoon of Vice President Dick Cheney&apos;s wife is no laughing matter at the White House, which has asked a satirist to remove pictures of her - complete with red clown noses - from his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.org/administration/lynne.asp&quot;&gt;Web site&lt;/a&gt;.

But the New York Civil Liberties Union struck back Wednesday on behalf of John A. Wooden, 31, threatening a lawsuit to protect his First Amendment rights to parody the White House and Bush officials on his site, whitehouse.org.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24093</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 07:13:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>lynnecheney</category>
		<category>whitehouse.org</category>
		<dc:creator>turbanhead</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Journalist Bill Wyman threatened with legal action for having same name as Rolling Stones member</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21688/Journalist%2DBill%2DWyman%2Dthreatened%2Dwith%2Dlegal%2Daction%2Dfor%2Dhaving%2Dsame%2Dname%2Das%2DRolling%2DStones%2Dmember</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.austin360.com/aas/life/ap/ap_story.html/Entertainment/AP.V4871.AP-People-Wyman.html"&gt;Journalist Bill Wyman threatened with legal action for having same name as Rolling Stones member.&lt;/a&gt; Via Google News.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21688</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2002 13:08:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>billwyman</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>rollingstones</category>
		<category>wyman</category>
		<dc:creator>stevenf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19614/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/dailynews/239/politics/Florida_counties_plan_to_settl:.shtml"&gt;Florida to settle 2000 election lawsuit.&lt;/a&gt; Major provisions include a promise for massive reforms in voter registration, voter-roll maintenance and polling practices, as part of the lawsuit pushed by the NAACP.  Granted, it&apos;s good that a large angered group is &quot;getting over it&quot; as many (even on this board) have still been explaining, but should skeptics (read: Democrats) such as myself read the Florida legislature&apos;s desire to settle as a sign that they may not have thought they would have won against charges of rigging the election?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19614</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 09:49:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>NAACP</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19291/</link>
		<description> The &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;other&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; other reparations movement: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/stories/newswire080102a.htm&quot;&gt;Penile reparations.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;...even where the procedure is performed at the professional standard, a circumcision is litigious if the consent is not informed... An army of lawyers will be there with this precedent and many more in their arsenal.&quot; [more inside]
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19291</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:10:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>circumcision</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<dc:creator>Slithy_Tove</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19244/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/26718.html"&gt;This new RIAA lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; really &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/26718.html&quot;&gt;frosts my cookies&lt;/a&gt;! I can&apos;t believe the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.riaa.com/&quot;&gt;Recording Industry Ass. of America&lt;/a&gt; has the balls to think they can censor the Internet, but they contend that &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soundbyting.com/html/top_10_myths/myths_index.html&quot;&gt;As a matter of fact, copyright itself was written into the Constitution before the Framers ever even got to the first 10 amendments.&quot; &lt;/a&gt;Therefore, the RIAA reserves for itself the right to determine which Internet websites you may view. Please discuss.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19244</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2002 10:03:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>block</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>TheRegister</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>Maxor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18489/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;cid=545&amp;amp;ncid=755&amp;amp;e=3&amp;amp;u=/ap/20020717/ap_on_sp_ba_ne/bbo_expos_lawsuit_12"&gt;Commish or Capo?&lt;/a&gt;  Commissioner of Baseball Bud Selig has been sued under the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ricoact.com/ricofaq.htm&quot;&gt;RICO Act&lt;/a&gt; for wire and mail fraud.  The charge stems from his attempt at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoplease.com/spot/contraction1.html&quot;&gt;contraction of two teams&lt;/a&gt; in Major League Baseball.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Mr. Selig can&apos;t seem to get a break from bad publicity.  Does he deserve one?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18489</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2002 23:53:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>baseball</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>BudSelig</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>RICO</category>
		<category>Selig</category>
		<category>sports</category>
		<dc:creator>Argyle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17576/</link>
		<description> Your quote of the day: &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;ncid=578&amp;e=2&amp;cid=578&amp;u=/nm/20020603/ts_nm/court_lawyer_sleep_dc_1&quot;&gt;&quot;She said harm should not be presumed just because the lawyer &apos;intermittently dozed and actually fell asleep.&apos;&quot; &lt;/a&gt;  Because, y&apos;know, the inmate&apos;s only on Death Row in Texas.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17576</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2002 13:35:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>deathrow</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>lawyers</category>
		<category>Texas</category>
		<dc:creator>solistrato</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17446/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/news/02-05/28.shtml"&gt;RIAA sues&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.audiogalaxy.com/&quot;&gt;Audiogalaxy&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;After targeting decentralized popular file-sharing services such as Kazaa, Morpheus, Grokster, and Madster, the Recording Industry Association of America took aim at Audiogalaxy in court last Friday...&quot;  [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://pitchforkmedia.com&quot;&gt;pfm&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17446</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 11:49:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Audiogalaxy</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>p2p</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<dc:creator>dobbs</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17068/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020511-9699493.htm"&gt;Deserts are dry? Sue.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The families of 11 immigrants who died [while] illegally crossing into Arizona from Mexico have filed a $41 million claim against two federal agencies, saying the government&apos;s refusal to put water out in the desert contributed to the migrants&apos; deaths.&quot; Do they have a case?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17068</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2002 12:07:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arizona</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>desert</category>
		<category>immigrants</category>
		<category>immigration</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>mexico</category>
		<dc:creator>darukaru</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16188/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020408/ts_nm/attack_lawsuit_dc_3&amp;amp;cid=578"&gt;Disgusting.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16188</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2002 12:38:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>AmericanAirlines</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<dc:creator>johnnydark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15833/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020326/ts_nm/rights_slavery_lawsuit_dc_4&amp;amp;printer=1"&gt;Reparations Sought From U.S. Firms for Slavery.&lt;/a&gt; Big U.S. companies were named in a lawsuit on Tuesday filed on behalf of black Americans descended from slaves, the first-ever class action seeking reparations from firms for profiting from slavery. Is this really sensible?
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15833</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:35:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>classaction</category>
		<category>companies</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>reparations</category>
		<category>slavey</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>sixdifferentways</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14089/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/~jwhite/tunney.html"&gt;Fed Up? Happy? Excited?&lt;/a&gt; Step right up and add your comments to the Microsoft Antitrust Trial.  Due to the Tunney Act, all of us have the right to comment on the proceedings. The comment period closes Monday morning (the 28th) so if you have an opinion, and we know everyone here does, email/snail mail/call the DOJ.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14089</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 05:23:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>trial</category>
		<dc:creator>plemeljr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13746/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20020111/tc/microsoft_privatesuits_dc_3.html"&gt;Judge kills Microsoft private suit settlement&lt;/a&gt;  that would have had MS donate hundreds of millions of dollars worth of software to schools... and effectively killed any incentive to use non-MS products such as a Macintosh or Linux.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13746</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:16:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>overturned</category>
		<category>schools</category>
		<category>settlement</category>
		<dc:creator>pmurray63</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13381/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=law/View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=ZZZDLY2UPVC&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;cst=1&amp;amp;pc=3&amp;amp;pa=0&amp;amp;s=News&amp;amp;ExpIgnore=true&amp;amp;showsummary=0"&gt;Court TV Seeks to Broadcast Moussaoui Trial.  &lt;/a&gt; The Senate has passed a bill allowing for the closed circuit televising (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courttv.com/casefiles/oklahoma/documents/govcirc.html&quot; title=&quot;May 1, 1996 brief, the government asks that closed-circuit television be set up for Oklahoma City bombing victims and their family members&quot;&gt;similar to that used in the case against McVeigh and Nichols&lt;/a&gt;) of the trial in this case to a number of locations for victims of the crimes associated with the terrorist acts of September 11th, who have an interest in attending, but can not do so because of inconvenience and expense.  Federal rules prohibit TV cameras in the courtroom, but Court TV argues that the prohibition is unconstitutional.  Television coverage has come a long way from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=381&amp;invol=532&quot; title=&quot;Estes v. Texas&quot;&gt;first case involving the impact of radio and television broadcasting&lt;/a&gt; before the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in an overturned conviction.   Should cameras be allowed in the courtroom, and if they are, will they &lt;a href=&quot;http://tlhsrv3.flabar.org/RHandbook01.nsf/1119bd38ae090a748525676f0053b606/5192d3660a0dd573852569cb004c8e15?OpenDocument&quot; title=&quot;see this article&apos;s sections on the historical perspective of courtroom media coverage and on federal courtrooms&quot;&gt; shape the outcome of the trial?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13381</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2001 22:55:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CourtTV</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>Moussaoui</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>trial</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>bragadocchio</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


