<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Lessig</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Lessig</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Lessig' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:35:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:35:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The perils of openness in government</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85745/The%2Dperils%2Dof%2Dopenness%2Din%2Dgovernment</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/books-and-arts/against-transparency"&gt;Against Transparency.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;How could anyone be against transparency? Its virtues and its utilities seem so crushingly obvious. But I have increasingly come to worry that there is an error at the core of this unquestioned goodness. We are not thinking critically enough about where and when transparency works, and where and when it may lead to confusion, or to worse. And I fear that the inevitable success of this movement--if pursued alone, without any sensitivity to the full complexity of the idea of perfect openness--will inspire not reform, but disgust. The &apos;naked transparency movement,&apos; as I will call it here, is not going to inspire change. It will simply push any faith in our political system over the cliff.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.3quarksdaily.com/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85745</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:35:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Government</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Transparency</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Free Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69212/Free%2DCongress</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://lessig08.org"&gt;In trademark style, Lawrence Lessig today announced the creation of a congressional exploratory committee.&lt;/a&gt; If in the next few days he decides to officially enter the race, he&apos;ll be running in the special election on April 8th to fill the CA-12 seat recently vacated by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/68971/RIP-Rep-Lantos&quot;&gt;the death of Tom Lantos&lt;/a&gt;.  A run by Lessig would likely be seen as a new front the the technocratic, post-partisan movement Barack Obama is attempting to catalyze; Lessig was a colleague of Obama at the University of Chicago law school, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=obamas_plan_for_opensource_democracy&quot;&gt;helped to draft Obama&apos;s technology plan&lt;/a&gt;, and is describing his potential run (his first attempt at public office), and the larger &lt;a href=&quot;http://change-congress.org/&quot;&gt;Change Congress&lt;/a&gt; project he also announced today, as an attempt to save Congress as an institution from the corrupting influence of money. Lessig would be an untraditional democratic candidate; he began his law career clerking for Justice Scalia, and gained celebrity &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eldred_v._Ashcroft&quot;&gt;fighting&lt;/a&gt; against Hollywood and the RIAA for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.free-culture.cc/&quot;&gt;shorter copyright terms and expanded fair use&lt;/a&gt;.  This move comes only months after Lessig &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/62296/Lessig-moves-on&quot;&gt;moved on&lt;/a&gt; from that work to focus on political corruption, saying at the time&lt;blockquote&gt; I have come to believe that until a more fundamental problem is fixed, [the free culture movement] can&apos;t succeed either. Compare: Imagine someone devoted to free culture coming to believe that until free software supports free culture, free culture can&apos;t succeed. So he devotes himself to building software. I am someone who believes that a free society -- free of the &quot;corruption&quot; that defines our current society -- is necessary for free culture, and much more. For that reason, I turn my energy elsewhere for now.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This announcement comes after a week of efforts to draft Lessig into the race on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=13417986140&amp;ref=nf&quot;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myspace.com/lawrencelessig&quot;&gt;MySpace&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://draftlessig.org/&quot;&gt;elsewhere&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69212</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:34:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>freeculture</category>
		<category>lantos</category>
		<category>lessig</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<dc:creator>gsteff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Character. Integrity. Do.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68810/Character%2DIntegrity%2DDo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://lessig.org/blog/2008/02/20_minutes_or_so_on_why_i_am_4.html"&gt;20 minutes or so on why I am 4Barack.&lt;/a&gt; A very thoughtful and eloquent comparison (&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.printf.net/articles/2008/2&quot;&gt;transcript&lt;/a&gt;) of the core differences between Obama and Clinton - by Creative Commons CEO and Professor &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Lessig&quot;&gt;Lawrence Lessig&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68810</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:44:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008</category>
		<category>Barack</category>
		<category>Clinton</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>Hillary</category>
		<category>Lawrence</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<dc:creator>zenzizi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lessig moves on.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62296/Lessig%2Dmoves%2Don</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/003800.shtml"&gt;Lawrence Lessig moves on&lt;/a&gt; Lessig has spent the last 10 years fighting for IP reform and open culture, He&apos;s decided to focus on fighting what he calls &quot;corruption&quot; (with quotes)... the pernicious effect that moneyed interests have in crafting and controlling public policy.&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;sub&gt;Finally, I am not (as one friend wrote) &quot;leaving the movement.&quot; &quot;The movement&quot; has my loyalty as much today as ever. But I have come to believe that until a more fundamental problem is fixed, &quot;the movement&quot; can&apos;t succeed either. Compare: Imagine someone devoted to free culture coming to believe that until free software supports free culture, free culture can&apos;t succeed. So he devotes himself to building software. I am someone who believes that a free society -- free of the &quot;corruption&quot; that defines our current society -- is necessary for free culture, and much more. For that reason, I turn my energy elsewhere for now.&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62296</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:23:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>creativecommons</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is the EFF harmful to online rights?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47312/Is%2Dthe%2DEFF%2Dharmful%2Dto%2Donline%2Drights</link>
		<description> In a sardonic new editorial, the Register asks whether &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/06/eff_needs_to_die/&quot;&gt;the EFF is harming the very causes that it&apos;s supposedly fighting for.&lt;/a&gt; This isn&apos;t coming out of left field. The EFF has lost numerous cases that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.papersplease.org/gilmore/legal.html&quot;&gt;could &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/media/internet/3949/&quot;&gt;have &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.duke.edu/publiclaw/supremecourtonline/certgrants/2004/mgmvgro.html&quot;&gt;been &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://eldred.cc/eldredvashcroft.html&quot;&gt;won&lt;/a&gt;, and in doing so is helping to creating precedents that make fights for civil liberties harder to wage.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47312</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:07:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DeCSS</category>
		<category>DMCA</category>
		<category>EFF</category>
		<category>FirstAmendment</category>
		<category>Grokster</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>MGM</category>
		<category>OnlineRights</category>
		<dc:creator>bshort</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Choirboy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42290/The%2DChoirboy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/features/12061/index.html"&gt;The Choirboy.&lt;/a&gt; Lawrence &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lessig.org/blog/&quot;&gt;Lessig&lt;/a&gt; takes onto an other battle.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42290</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 09:09:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abuse</category>
		<category>child</category>
		<category>lessig</category>
		<dc:creator>NewBornHippy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lessig and Epstein debate DRM, IP law</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42107/Lessig%2Dand%2DEpstein%2Ddebate%2DDRM%2DIP%2Dlaw</link>
		<description> In &lt;i&gt;Technology Review&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/06/issue/feature_people.asp&quot;&gt;Lawrence Lessig&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/06/issue/feature_creators.asp&quot;&gt;Richard Epstein&lt;/a&gt; are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/06/issue/feature_rebuttal.asp&quot;&gt;debating&lt;/a&gt; intellectual property, free software, and digital rights management.        &lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;Shamelessly lifted, verbatim, from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/2005/05/free_as_in_talk.shtml#009551&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; by Reason&apos;s Jesse Walker&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42107</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 08:18:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DRM</category>
		<category>epstein</category>
		<category>intellectual</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>lessig</category>
		<category>property</category>
		<dc:creator>Kwantsar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Yahoo Search for Creative Commons Content</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40696/Yahoo%2DSearch%2Dfor%2DCreative%2DCommons%2DContent</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://search.yahoo.com/cc"&gt;Yahoo Releases a beta tool that searches for Creative Commons content.&lt;/a&gt; It even allows you to specify the type of license you&apos;re interested in (derivitive works, commercial use). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/002790.shtml&quot;&gt;Lawrence Lessig&lt;/a&gt; obviously has something to say about it. If nothing else, it will increase awareness of the cause.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40696</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:00:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>creativecommons</category>
		<category>lessig</category>
		<category>searchengine</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>o2b</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How I Lost the Big One</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31536/How%2DI%2DLost%2Dthe%2DBig%2DOne</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/March-April-2004/story_lessig_marapr04.html"&gt;How I Lost the Big One&lt;/a&gt; Lawrence Lessig on losing Eldred v. Ashcroft: &quot;We had in our Constitution a commitment to free culture. In the case that I fathered, the Supreme Court effectively renounced that commitment. A better lawyer would have made them see differently.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31536</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:53:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ashcroft</category>
		<category>Copyright</category>
		<category>Eldred</category>
		<category>FreeCulture</category>
		<category>FreeSpeech</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>LawrenceLessig</category>
		<category>Lawyer</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>Liberty</category>
		<category>Rights</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<dc:creator>ericost</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rules Against Eldred</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22838/Supreme%2DCourt%2DRules%2DAgainst%2DEldred</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SCOTUS_COPYRIGHTS?SITE=COFOR&amp;SECTION=HOME&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has ruled&lt;/a&gt;, seven to two, that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Bono_Copyright_Term_Extension_Act&quot;&gt;Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998&lt;/a&gt; is not unconstitutional. The act automatically extended copyright by an additional 20 years, delaying by those two decades the entry of works into the public domain. &lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/&quot;&gt;Lawrence Lessig&lt;/a&gt; and others have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.immaterial.net/page.php/95/&quot;&gt;argued&lt;/a&gt; that the Act places unreasonable and unnecessary bounds on the potential of the Internet, as well as effectively rendering unobtainable many works from the early decades of the twentieth century.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22838</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:05:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>Lessig</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>Songdog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20757/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.abanet.org/journal/ereport/oct11blawg.html"&gt;B&lt;i&gt;law&lt;/i&gt;gs:&lt;/a&gt; Blogs from the legal world.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/&quot;&gt;Lessig&lt;/a&gt; is not the only lawyer sharing his expertise in the blog format.  Blawgs range from individual lawyers (&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0104634/&quot;&gt;Ernie the Attorney&lt;/a&gt;) to entire firms using a collaborative format to focus on a single practice area (such as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goldsteinhowe.com/blog/&quot;&gt;Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt;).  &quot;Almost every law firm is trying to build a &lt;a href=&quot;http://directory.google.com/Top/Reference/Knowledge_Management/&quot;&gt;knowledge management &lt;/a&gt;system for itself to take advantage of the expertise within the firm,&quot; Svenson says. &quot;But with blawgs, it happens organically. If you gave your lawyers their own blawgs, pretty soon everyone within the firm could see who knows the most about different topics.&quot;  Are knowledge management systems feasible &lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt; practical yet?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20757</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:28:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>lessig</category>
		<dc:creator>ajr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19103/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://randomfoo.net/oscon/2002/lessig/"&gt;Free Culture&lt;/a&gt; (8Mb flash). &lt;a href=&quot;http://lessig.org/&quot;&gt;Lawrence Lessig&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s keynote speech at this year&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/&quot;&gt;OSCON&lt;/a&gt; conference is a stirring and effective explanation of how the entertainment industry, with the help of lawmakers, have undermined our fundamental right to create.  Lessig asks, &lt;i&gt;what have you personally done to stop them?&lt;/i&gt;  This &lt;a href=&quot;http://randomfoo.net/oscon/2002/lessig/&quot;&gt;30 minute long flash slideshow&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.creativecommons.org/freeculture/&quot;&gt;mirror&lt;/a&gt;), compiled by &lt;a href=&quot;http://randomfoo.net/&quot;&gt;Leonard Lin&lt;/a&gt;, tells you what happened and what you can do.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19103</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:34:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>freeculture</category>
		<category>lessig</category>
		<dc:creator>waxpancake</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


