<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Liberal</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Liberal</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Liberal' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:22:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:22:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>What would Michelle Bachmann eat?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86594/What%2Dwould%2DMichelle%2DBachmann%2Deat</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hunch.com/media/reports/food/&quot;&gt; How Food Preferences Vary by Political Ideology&lt;/a&gt; Courtesy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hunch.com/&quot;&gt;Hunch&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/82476/Just-a-hunch&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86594</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:22:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Conservative</category>
		<category>Food</category>
		<category>Hunch</category>
		<category>Liberal</category>
		<category>Nom</category>
		<category>Omnom</category>
		<dc:creator>Lord_Pall</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Michael B&amp;#0233;rub&amp;#0233; is back blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75255/Michael%2DB%E9rub%E9%2Dis%2Dback%2Dblogging</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php&quot;&gt;Michael B&amp;#0233;rub&amp;#0233;&lt;/a&gt;, professor of American Literature and Cultural Studies at Penn State, one of America&apos;s most &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=CYqZjtVp00AC&amp;pg=PA71&amp;lpg=PA71&amp;dq=%22Berube%22%2B%22economic+transformations%22&amp;source=web&amp;ots=xD6ttUUrnA&amp;sig=1N-62XLeGTnSZxe56iS9XE9ayU4&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=5&amp;ct=result&quot;&gt;dangerous&lt;/a&gt; professors, &lt;a href=&quot;http://2006.weblogawards.org/2006/12/best_educational_blog.php&quot;&gt;award&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://wampum.wabanaki.net/vault/2006/04/002603.html&quot;&gt;winning&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogawards.org/2005/12/best_of_the_top_251_500_blogs.php&quot;&gt;blogger&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.powells.com/biblio/62-0393060373-0&quot;&gt;author&lt;/a&gt;, and father of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/C5/&quot;&gt;Jamie B&amp;#0233;rub&amp;#0233;&lt;/a&gt;, has started up his blog again.  I, for one, welcome our new(ly) blogging (again) overlords.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/43783/this-is-the-post-title&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75255</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:01:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>disabilitystudies</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>theory</category>
		<dc:creator>pasici</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Conservatives are scaredy-cats</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75044/Conservatives%2Dare%2Dscaredycats</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sciencenow;2008/918/2&quot;&gt;The Politics of Fear&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=112246&amp;org=NSF&quot;&gt;Some Political Views May be Related to Physiology&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nsfgov.httpsvc.vitalstreamcdn.com/nsfgov_vitalstream_com/politics.swf&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://nsfgov.httpsvc.vitalstreamcdn.com/nsfgov_vitalstream_com/podcast/hibbing.mp3&quot;&gt;audio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; news stories - &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7623256.stm&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;British Broadcasting Corporation&quot;&gt;BBC&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080919/NEWS03/809190354/1022/LIVING02&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94764491&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;National Public Radio&quot;&gt;NPR&lt;/acronym&gt; with audio&lt;/a&gt;

Plus, a 2006 lecture on the heritability of political attitudes by John Hibbing, one of the authors of the above study - &lt;a href=&quot;http://videocast.com/episode/19080427/&quot;&gt;flash video&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unl.edu/unlpub/podcasts/videofiles/HibbingsNebraskaLecture.m4v&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;Moving Picture Experts Group&quot;&gt;MPEG&lt;/acronym&gt;4 download&lt;/a&gt;, starts at around 10:00 and runs for about an hour  (during the intro &lt;acronym title=&quot;by the way&quot;&gt;btw&lt;/acronym&gt; he quips &quot;I&apos;m a social scientist pretending to be a scientist...&quot;) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75044</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 15:06:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>physiology</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>XMLicious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Point dog!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72042/Point%2Ddog</link>
		<description> Intense debate about weighty issues like racism, abortion, and immigration... between animals in funny hats! This is the silly punditry of &lt;em&gt;Scenario: Dog v. Cat&lt;/em&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=8a25c39219e182770119e3aecee4000f&quot;&gt;Round 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=8a25c3921a059109011a06b121cf0004&quot;&gt;round 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=8a25c3921a059109011a06b33a87000a&quot;&gt;round 3&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72042</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:12:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adultswim</category>
		<category>cat</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>dog</category>
		<category>dogvcat</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>scenario</category>
		<category>williamsstreet</category>
		<dc:creator>hjo3</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>History is a Weapon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72008/History%2Dis%2Da%2DWeapon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyisaweapon.org/indextrue.html"&gt;History is a Weapon&lt;/a&gt; -- Featuring &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/bernprop.html&quot;&gt;Propaganda&lt;/a&gt; by the inventor of modern PR, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays&quot;&gt;Edward Bernays&lt;/a&gt;, essays by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/clinton.htm&quot;&gt;Bill Clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/debs.html&quot;&gt;Eugene Debs&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/douglassjuly4.html&quot;&gt;Frederick Douglass&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/aintwomantruth.html&quot;&gt;Sojourner Truth&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/twain.html&quot;&gt;Mark Twain&lt;/a&gt;, the entirety of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyisaweapon.org/zinnapeopleshistory.html&quot;&gt;A People&apos;s History of the United States&lt;/a&gt; by Howard Zinn, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyisaweapon.org/indexsmall.html&quot;&gt;much, much more&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72008</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:58:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antiwar</category>
		<category>essays</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>leftwing</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>nonviolence</category>
		<category>pacifist</category>
		<category>socialist</category>
		<dc:creator>empath</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Are Liberals and Conservatives Different Species?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69493/Are%2DLiberals%2Dand%2DConservatives%2DDifferent%2DSpecies</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sloan-wilson/are-liberals-and-conserva_b_72044.html"&gt;Are Liberals and Conservatives Different Species?&lt;/a&gt; Get this: Everyone in our sample was an American, a teenager, and belonged to the same major religious tradition of Protestantism. In these respects they were culturally uniform. But some belonged to conservative denominations such as Pentecostal and others to liberal denominations such as Episcopalian.  As Ingrid combed through the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1412949238/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;data&lt;/a&gt;, which involved tedious hours in front of the computer, the differences that began to emerge were astounding.  It was as if these conservative and liberal religious youth were--different species. [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.3quarksdaily.com/&quot;&gt;3quarksdaily&lt;/a&gt;] &lt;a href=&quot;http://evolution.binghamton.edu/dswilson/resources/publications_resources/LibCons.pdf&quot;&gt;Original research.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sloan_Wilson&quot;&gt;Some background on David Sloan Wilson&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69493</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:23:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>teenager</category>
		<dc:creator>sisquoc15</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>When this world&apos;s big enough for all different views...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69093/When%2Dthis%2Dworlds%2Dbig%2Denough%2Dfor%2Dall%2Ddifferent%2Dviews</link>
		<description> From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmt.com/news/articles/1568955/20070905/brooks_garth.jhtml&quot;&gt;unprecedented chart-topping&lt;/a&gt;, to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetgarth.com/news/article.php?cid=00221&quot;&gt;crossover appeal&lt;/a&gt;, to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetgarth.com/chrisgaines/&quot;&gt;bizarre image change&lt;/a&gt; and retirement from music, he was truly country&apos;s Michael Jackson.  While many of us may not have cared for his music or paid much attention to his core audience, those of us who were inspired despite ourselves by the (previously posted) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dipdive.com&quot;&gt;Will.i.am&lt;/a&gt; video might just find something in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://gaytoday.badpuppy.com/garchive/entertain/040599en.htm&quot;&gt;surprisingly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1285/is_n3_v24/ai_15409037&quot;&gt;liberal&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IgvCKjt8ps&quot;&gt;prince of the red states.&lt;/a&gt; From the GLAAD Hollywood list:  &lt;i&gt;What&apos;s odd is that nobody assumed it could mean interracial marriages or interfaith marriages. They immediately went straight to the homosexual thing... I can&apos;t see love being a bad thing. Lust is different. But if you&apos;re in love, you&apos;ve got to follow your heart and trust that God will explain to us why we sometimes fall in love with people of the same sex. Judgment Day is coming, and I ain&apos;t going to be the one standing over people up there.&lt;/i&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69093</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:59:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brooks</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>dontjudgeabookbyitscover</category>
		<category>Garth</category>
		<category>GarthBrooks</category>
		<category>gayrights</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>redstates</category>
		<category>william</category>
		<dc:creator>Navelgazer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cognitive Differences Between Liberals and Conservatives?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64614/Cognitive%2DDifferences%2DBetween%2DLiberals%2Dand%2DConservatives</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-politics10sep10,1,5376455.story?ctrack=1&amp;amp;cset=true"&gt;In an experiment&lt;/a&gt; reported in the journal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nn1979.html&quot;&gt;Nature Neuroscience&lt;/a&gt;, scientists at NYU and UCLA demonstrate that political orientation is related to basic differences in cognition - how the brain processes information. Psychological studies in the past found conservatives tend to be more structured and persistent in their judgments while liberals are more &quot;open to new experiences.&quot; The latest study finds these traits are not confined to political situations but also influence everyday decisions. On one hand, there is something to be said about focus and holding to your convictions under pressure. On the other hand, there is also something to be said about the ability to reprocess a situation as it unfolds and try a different tactic if needed. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64614</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:00:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<dc:creator>uaudio</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;PASS THIS ON!  (emails from the right)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63861/PASS%2DTHIS%2DON%2Demails%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2Dright</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2007-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&amp;amp;updated-max=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&amp;amp;max-results=100"&gt;My Right Wing Dad&lt;/a&gt; is a new-ish and rather informal blog that aims to provide &quot;a chance for folks to examine the unrestrained rhetoric that is quietly passed from in-box to in-box in America,&quot; by hosting a collection of the emails that form an often untraceable and unacknowledged part of public discourse in the U.S., especially on the Right.  Tagged by category (for example: &lt;a href=&quot;http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/search/label/GOD&quot;&gt;God&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/search/label/college&quot;&gt;college&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/search/label/FLAG&quot;&gt;flag&lt;/a&gt;,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/search/label/LIBERAL&quot;&gt;liberal&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/search/label/WORLD%20WAR%20II&quot;&gt;World War II&lt;/a&gt;), the amateur archive presents a range of colorful opinion, not all of it strikingly accurate, and some of it offensive.  In efforts to understand &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.visualcomplexity.com/vc/project.cfm?id=227&quot;&gt;liberal and conservative habits of communication&lt;/a&gt;, it may be worth considering the role of forwarded email in the electoral process, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7662&quot;&gt;reasons that the forwarding of email is popular among some people&lt;/a&gt;, and whether this behavior tends to correlate with particular political opinions.   The emails hosted on MyRightWingDad may in any case be enlightening, unless you&apos;re already on the forward list of someone in the know.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63861</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:16:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>democrat</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>myrightwingdad</category>
		<category>polemic</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>republican</category>
		<category>rhetoric</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It ends when you&apos;re dead</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63010/It%2Dends%2Dwhen%2Dyoure%2Ddead</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thepaincomics.com/"&gt;Tim Kreider&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; editorial cartoons have that sort of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly050420.htm&quot;&gt;vulgarity&lt;/a&gt;,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly050504.htm&quot;&gt;puerility, &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly070404.htm&quot;&gt;absurdity&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly070328.htm&quot;&gt;topicality&lt;/a&gt;,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly070328.htm&quot;&gt;pith&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly070214.htm&quot;&gt;bile&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly050525.htm&quot;&gt;self-awareness&lt;/a&gt; that help me get through the unending despair of reading the news every day.  

(He also draws great faces.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63010</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:27:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cartoon</category>
		<category>comic</category>
		<category>comics</category>
		<category>editorial</category>
		<category>kreider</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>timkreider</category>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Left&apos;s Victim Complex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62066/The%2DLefts%2DVictim%2DComplex</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://adbusters.org/the_magazine/71/The_American_Lefts_Silly_Victim_Complex.html"&gt;The American Left&apos;s Silly Victim Complex&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62066</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:20:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<dc:creator>exogenous</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Quebec voters elect first minority provincial government since 1878</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59771/Quebec%2Dvoters%2Delect%2Dfirst%2Dminority%2Dprovincial%2Dgovernment%2Dsince%2D1878</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/quebecvotes2007/story/2007/03/26/qv-liberals20070326.html"&gt;Results of tonight&apos;s election in Quebec are in.&lt;/a&gt; The Quebec Liberal Party has managed just barely to hold onto power in that province, winning a minority government--the first time this has happened in &lt;i&gt;la belle province&lt;/i&gt; since...well...since the year the phonograph was first patented. But there&apos;s an even bigger story. And that&apos;s the apparent collapse of the separatist &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parti_Qu&amp;#0233;b&amp;#0233;cois&quot;&gt;Parti Qu&amp;#0233;b&amp;#0233;cois&lt;/a&gt; vote, in favour of the centre-right &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_d&amp;#0233;mocratique_du_Qu&amp;#0233;bec&quot;&gt;Action D&amp;#0233;mocratique Party&lt;/a&gt;, surprising just about everybody other than those who actually live in the province. 

Here&apos;s the breakdown in the vote as of 11:00PM: &lt;br&gt;
Liberal (32.50%) - ADQ (31.19%) - PQ (28.48%). 

What these results mean for Canada&apos;s federal parliament---also in a minority situation---is anyone&apos;s guess at this point. The smart money is on Prime Minister Harper calling an early summer election. These results tonight would certainly give him reason to think that Quebec voters are in the mood for change. But like spring weather in these parts, things are quite changeable these days.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59771</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:12:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ADQ</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>PQ</category>
		<category>quebec</category>
		<dc:creator>runningdogofcapitalism</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Seeing the Other Side</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53784/Seeing%2Dthe%2DOther%2DSide</link>
		<description> Thanks to &lt;a href=&quot;http://peacemoonbeam.typepad.com/&quot;&gt;Peace Moonbeam&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s weblog, I now truly understand my liberal friends. And for those willing to reciprocate, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shelleytherepublican.com/&quot;&gt;Shelley the Republican&lt;/a&gt; is a similar blog from the opposite end of the spectrum.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53784</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 04:52:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>satire</category>
		<dc:creator>CodeBaloo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Canada&apos;s Next Prime Minister</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50769/Canadas%2DNext%2DPrime%2DMinister</link>
		<description> On December 3rd, 2006 Canada&apos;s next Prime Minister will be decided by a few thousand &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberal.ca/news_e.aspx?site=news&amp;id=11509&quot; title=&quot;To be eligible to be a delegate, a person must first be a member of the Liberal Party of Canada. To become a delegate, a person must be elected by voting members at a Delegate Election Meeting (DEM) held in their riding or recognized club. ----- A DEM will take place in all 308 local riding associations across the country. All DEMs take place across the country on the same weekend. There are also DEMs that take place in recognized Young Liberal student clubs, seniors&#8217; clubs, womens&#8217;clubs, and aboriginal groups. A person must fill out a nomination form that indicates: (a) which Leadership Candidate they intend to support; or (b) that you wish to stand for election as an independent delegate. If elected, they may attend the Leadership Convention as a delegate.&quot;&gt;delegates&lt;/a&gt; at the Liberal party convention in Montreal &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberal.ca/join_e.aspx&quot;&gt;join&lt;/a&gt; for ~$10)&lt;/small&gt;. Don&apos;t believe me? In the last 110 years of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/liberals/&quot; title=&quot;In 1919 Laurier was replaced &#8211; on an interim basis &#8211; by Daniel D. McKenzie, the only Liberal leader since 1896 not to serve as prime minister.&quot;&gt;Liberal party history&lt;/a&gt; only one leader has failed to become Prime Minister. No fewer than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060407/leadership_event_060408/20060408?hub=CTVNewsAt11&quot; title=&quot;Officially declared: Clifford Blais, St&amp;#0233;phane Dion, Martha Hall Findlay, John Godfrey, Michael Ignatieff, Gerard Kennedy. ----- Why were they speaking if they aren&apos;t candidates: Carolyn Bennett, Maurizio Bevilacqua, Scott Brison, Ruby Dhalla, Joe Fontana, Hedy Fry, John McCallum, Bob Rae, Joe Volpe, Paul Zed.&quot;&gt;sixteen candidates met in Edmonton&lt;/a&gt; last week. On the surface the candidates are making nice. &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/04/08/libs-060408.html&quot;&gt;Ignatieff:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;None of us, none of us are going to run against each other. All of us are running against Stephen Harper&apos;s vision of Canada.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt; It is even said that Bob Rae and Ignatieff are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/02autumn/school.asp#two&quot;&gt;life long close friends&lt;/a&gt;. That didn&apos;t stop the Ignatieff campaign co-chair.&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060405/peterson_rae_060405/20060405?hub=Canada&quot;&gt;David Peterson:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;[Rae&apos;s] got some terrible burdens to overcome. &lt;b&gt;One is his record and one is his loyalty&lt;/b&gt;.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Emphasis mine, and &amp;lt;more inside&amp;gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50769</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 16:53:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>Ignatieff</category>
		<category>Kennedy</category>
		<category>leader</category>
		<category>leadership</category>
		<category>Liberal</category>
		<category>Peterson</category>
		<category>PrimeMinister</category>
		<category>Rae</category>
		<dc:creator>Chuckles</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Meanwhile, in Canada...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50527/Meanwhile%2Din%2DCanada</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ignatieff"&gt;Michael Ignatieff,&lt;/a&gt; the candidate parachuted into Etobicoke by supporters who would see him as the next leader of the federal &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_of_Canada&quot;&gt;Liberal Party&lt;/a&gt; of Canada, has just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060330.wignatiefftext0330/BNStory/National/?page=rss&amp;id=RTGAM.20060330.wignatiefftext0330&quot;&gt;given a speech&lt;/a&gt; outlining his vision for Canada, which is probably the forerunner to an official announcement about his candidacy. (Previously, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47054&quot;&gt;on MeFi&lt;/a&gt;.) If he runs, he will be up against &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marthahallfindlay.ca/&quot;&gt;Martha Hall Findlay&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johngodfrey.on.ca/&quot;&gt;John Godfrey&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mauriziobevilacqua.com/&quot;&gt;Maurizio Bevilacqua&lt;/a&gt; who have all declared. Other contenders might well include &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St%C3%A9phane_Dion&quot;&gt;St&amp;#0233;phane Dion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joevolpe.com/&quot;&gt;Joe Volpe&lt;/a&gt;,  and hockey legend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kendryden.ca/&quot;&gt;Ken Dryden&lt;/a&gt;. Finally, the race appears to be hotting up.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50527</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:03:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>Dion</category>
		<category>Dryden</category>
		<category>Ignatieff</category>
		<category>Liberal</category>
		<dc:creator>Zinger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Whiny future conservatives?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50276/Whiny%2Dfuture%2Dconservatives</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=1142722231554&amp;amp;call_pageid=970599119419"&gt;Things we already knew:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Jack Block and his wife and fellow professor Jeanne Block (now deceased) began tracking more than 100 nursery school kids as part of a general study of personality. The kids&apos; personalities were rated at the time by teachers and assistants who had known them for months. ...  A few decades later, Block followed up with more surveys, looking again at personality, and this time at politics, too. The whiny kids tended to grow up conservative, and turned into rigid young adults who hewed closely to traditional gender roles and were uncomfortable with ambiguity.  The confident kids turned out liberal and were still hanging loose, turning into bright, non-conforming adults with wide interests.&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50276</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:19:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Conservative</category>
		<category>Kids</category>
		<category>Liberal</category>
		<category>Pop_Psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Liberal Capitalism and Evil</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49981/Liberal%2DCapitalism%2Dand%2DEvil</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/5/alainbadiou.php"&gt;On Evil: An Interview with Alain Badiou&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49981</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:40:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Alain</category>
		<category>Badiou</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>evil</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<dc:creator>kuatto</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pigs against Poverty</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49619/Pigs%2Dagainst%2DPoverty</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.truemajority.org"&gt;True Majority&lt;/a&gt; Weird+political+gadgets: The inventor of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hokeyspokes.com/&quot;&gt;Hokey Spokes&lt;/a&gt; has teamed up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truemajority.org/fun/&quot;&gt;Ben Cohen&lt;/a&gt; (of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benjerry.com/&quot;&gt;Ben &amp;amp; Jerry&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; fame) to add a computerized &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/000477.php&quot;&gt;EL-wire light&lt;/a&gt; display system to Ben&apos;s family of motorized pigs, which illustrate the relative size of the military, education, and world health/AIDS budgets. All is service of Ben&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truemajority.org&quot;&gt;TrueMajority&lt;/a&gt; project.

Pics &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/robsmith/sets/72057594071545889/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49619</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:36:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>artcars</category>
		<category>bencohen</category>
		<category>benjerrys</category>
		<category>federalbudget</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>re6smith</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Come Home, America: Liberals need another George McGovern&#8212;and perhaps conservatives do too</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48617/Come%2DHome%2DAmerica%2DLiberals%2Dneed%2Danother%2DGeorge%2DMcGovernand%2Dperhaps%2Dconservatives%2Ddo%2Dtoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_01_30/article.html"&gt;Come Home, America:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/archive.shtml&quot;&gt;Pat Buchanan&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; magazine, The American Conservative, prints a passionate defense of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcgovernlibrary.com/george.htm&quot;&gt;George McGovern&lt;/a&gt;.      (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/2006/01/communion.shtml#012387&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48617</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:56:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>buchanan</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>democrat</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>mcgovern</category>
		<category>nixon</category>
		<category>republican</category>
		<dc:creator>pandaharma</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Seeing the other side</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48212/Seeing%2Dthe%2Dother%2Dside</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bostonreview.net/BR31.1/hansonbenforado.html"&gt;Why does the Supreme Court Make Justices More Liberal?&lt;/a&gt; Does it?  If so, why, and why more liberal not more conservative?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48212</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:04:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>courts</category>
		<category>justices</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Supreme_Court</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Conservative Blogs Rock!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47458/Conservative%2DBlogs%2DRock</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001657918"&gt;Conservative Blogs Rock!&lt;/a&gt; NEW YORK In an argument sure to be challenged in certain sectors of the blogosphere, a story in The New York Times magazine coming up this Sunday declares that conservative blogs continue to best liberal blogs in political and electoral influence.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47458</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:20:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Sagres</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47228/Freedom%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dpress%2Dis%2Dguaranteed%2Donly%2Dto%2Dthose%2Dwho%2Down%2Done</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.truthdig.com/"&gt;truthdig&lt;/a&gt; --drilling beneath the headlines. A new webmagazine, offering &lt;i&gt;expert in-depth coverage of current affairs as well as a variety of thoughtful, provocative content assembled from a progressive point of view. The site is built around major &#8220;digs,&#8221; led by authorities in their fields, who will drill down into contemporary topics and assemble packages of content...&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthdig.com/about/staff/4&quot;&gt;Robert Scheer&lt;/a&gt; is editor in chief (you may know him from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/columnists/scheer/archive/&quot;&gt;SF Chronicle&lt;/a&gt;). The current featured &quot;dig&quot; is on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthdig.com/dig/item/religion_homosexuality/&quot;&gt;religion and homosexuality.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47228</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:43:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>events</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>magazine</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>progressive</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>UK Liberal Democrat councillor Paul Leake chooses his blog over his party</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45230/UK%2DLiberal%2DDemocrat%2Dcouncillor%2DPaul%2DLeake%2Dchooses%2Dhis%2Dblog%2Dover%2Dhis%2Dparty</link>
		<description> UK politician chooses his blog over his party: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulleake.org.uk&quot;&gt;Paul Leake&lt;/a&gt;, a Liberal Democrat councillor in Durham, was asked by his local party to remove any &quot;controversial&quot; posts from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readmyday.co.uk/blogs/index.php?blogid=24&quot;&gt;his weblog&lt;/a&gt; and to give them the right to vet future posts. Denis Jackson, another Liberal Democrat on Durham City Council, said that the Labour councillors were using the blog to find &quot;lurid headlines&quot;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readmyday.co.uk/blogs/index.php?itemid=634&quot;&gt;Leake refused, and stepped down from the party&lt;/a&gt;. He&apos;ll now serve his constituents as an independent. [Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggerheads.com/political_weblogs/archives/2005/09/paul_leake_choo.html&quot;&gt;The Political Weblog Project&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45230</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:41:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>labour</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>tapeguy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>teh hill.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42348/teh%2Dhill</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20050527/pl_usatoday/pollmajoritysaytheydbelikelytovoteforclinton"&gt;Hillary Clinton?&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/5/27/12050/2462&quot;&gt;progressive &lt;/a&gt; side of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://atrios.blogspot.com/2005_05_22_atrios_archive.html#111721238167260609&quot;&gt;blogsphere&lt;/a&gt; is a twitter with news that 53% of the public would vote for Hillary. What do you think?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42348</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 02:26:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Clinton</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>helmethair</category>
		<category>Hillary</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>progressive</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lee and Dan&apos;s Excellent Adverts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41658/Lee%2Dand%2DDans%2DExcellent%2DAdverts</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=67"&gt;The truth behind the spin?&lt;/a&gt; - three party political broadcasts (.wmv) made by &lt;a href=&quot;http://leeanddan.com/&quot;&gt;Lee and Dan&lt;/a&gt;, the men behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/38736&quot;&gt;VW Suicide Bomber&lt;/a&gt; advert, and commissioned by the UK&apos;s Channel 4  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41658</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:23:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Advertising</category>
		<category>Conservative</category>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>Labour</category>
		<category>Liberal</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Spoof</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Navek Rednam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


