<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with LifeAquatic</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/LifeAquatic</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'LifeAquatic' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:58:58 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:58:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Wes Anderson and the Problem with Hipsters</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38371/Wes%2DAnderson%2Dand%2Dthe%2DProblem%2Dwith%2DHipsters</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nplusonemag.com/"&gt;Is N+1&apos;s review of the Life Aquatic&lt;/a&gt; more than a bit snobbish or dead on? While I agree with much of the review, particularly how Life Aquatic seemed to lack a plot, I can&apos;t help but feel icky having read this.  (Link via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popfactor.com/tmftml/archives/001851.html&quot;&gt;TMFTML&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38371</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:58:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>filmreview</category>
		<category>LifeAquatic</category>
		<category>moviereview</category>
		<category>WesAnderson</category>
		<dc:creator>box elder</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


