<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Lucire</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Lucire</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Lucire' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 14:58:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 14:58:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Lucire enters the real world</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33405/Lucire%2Denters%2Dthe%2Dreal%2Dworld</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lucire.com/2004a/0516ll0.shtml&quot;&gt;Lucire the fashion website becomes the next website to go real world with a magazine in newsagents.&lt;/a&gt;  It&apos;s not the first (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chud.com/&quot;&gt;Chud&lt;/a&gt; which publishes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livepublishing.co.uk/content/movieinsider.shtml&quot;&gt;Movie Insider&lt;/a&gt;) but they&apos;ve taken the step of putting the prototype May issue online in .pdf format and are asking readers for their input.  How well can they do in an already crowded market place and is it significantly different for us to care?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33405</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 14:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>Lucire</category>
		<category>magazine</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>NewZealand</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


