<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with MSN and AOL</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/MSN+AOL</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'MSN' and 'AOL' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:52:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:52:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Search engine battle heats up</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70906/Search%2Dengine%2Dbattle%2Dheats%2Dup</link>
		<description> According to ComScore, Google takes 59.8% of search traffic in the US, leaving Yahoo, MSN and smaller players to fight for the scraps. &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080415-184858.php&quot;&gt;Pretty pie-chart here&lt;/a&gt;. Slightly different numbers are available from &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080415-151201.php&quot;&gt;Compete &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080414-135322.php&quot;&gt;Hitwise&lt;/a&gt;, but Google still rules the roost.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70906</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:52:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengine</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>SharQ</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3215/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://preview.msn.com/"&gt;Does anyone really dig the new MSN?&lt;/a&gt; I am not a member of the Church of Microsoft but I do really like what they have done with the new MSN.  I&apos;m not talking about just the web site but the overall experience with the MSN Preview 2.0.  I think they may be in a position to really give AOL a run for the money.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3215</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:17:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<dc:creator>Brilliantcrank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/866/</link>
		<description> Today&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davenetics.com&quot;&gt;Davenetics&lt;/a&gt; (it&apos;s a newsletter) noticed a flurry of wireless deals came about today. AOL is planning &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-1559048.html&quot;&gt;mobile versions of instant messenger, email, and other AOL services&lt;/a&gt;, Microsoft is working on &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-1559068.html&quot;&gt;mobile MSN and Hotmail&lt;/a&gt;, while Amazon has unveiled &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.excite.com/news/r/000228/06/net-amazon-wireless&quot;&gt;their phone portal to shopping&lt;/a&gt;. Looks like we will soon be reminiscing about the good old days when the internet used silly wires and cables.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.866</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:45:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIM</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>cell</category>
		<category>Davenetics</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>IM</category>
		<category>mobile</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>phones</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/850/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.activewin.com/articles/mars/1.shtml"&gt;Mars, the next version of MSN, is just around the corner.&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s obviously an AOL clone, giving new users a view of the internet filtered for ease of use. My opinion of it is split. On the one hand, there&apos;s nothing wrong with making a useful, straight-forward interface that anyone can use. In fact that&apos;s a holy grail for UI designers. But the interface is a bit much, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.activewin.com/articles/mars/images/ui-1.jpg&quot;&gt;taking up over a third of the screen real estate&lt;/a&gt;, and it will no doubt funnel users into all of the MSN websites. Will MSN users know the rest of the internet is out there?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.850</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2000 00:30:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>clone</category>
		<category>mars</category>
		<category>messaging</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/tc/zd/story.html?s=v/zd/19990726/tc/19990726348"&gt;AOL and Microsoft are resorting to playground antics.&lt;/a&gt; I downloaded the new MS messenger when it came out last Thursday, and I&apos;ve already gotten three patches for it, each time it works with AOL users for just a few hours. I wonder how long they&apos;ll continue the dueling banjos thing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.57</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:25:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aim</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>im</category>
		<category>messenger</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


