<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with MSN and google</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/MSN+google</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'MSN' and 'google' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:12:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:12:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Fo Shizzle My Nizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75076/Fo%2DShizzle%2DMy%2DNizzle</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchenginerapbattle.com/&quot;&gt;Search Engine Battle.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75076</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:12:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>battle</category>
		<category>geeks</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>gman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Search engine battle heats up</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70906/Search%2Dengine%2Dbattle%2Dheats%2Dup</link>
		<description> According to ComScore, Google takes 59.8% of search traffic in the US, leaving Yahoo, MSN and smaller players to fight for the scraps. &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080415-184858.php&quot;&gt;Pretty pie-chart here&lt;/a&gt;. Slightly different numbers are available from &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080415-151201.php&quot;&gt;Compete &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/080414-135322.php&quot;&gt;Hitwise&lt;/a&gt;, but Google still rules the roost.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70906</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:52:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengine</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>SharQ</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>SBC Vonage Google Internet pay Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46292/SBC%2DVonage%2DGoogle%2DInternet%2Dpay%2DYahoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_45/b3958089.htm"&gt;&quot;They use my lines for free -- and that&apos;s bull.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; The CEO of SBC Communications Inc. Ed Whitacre launched this criticism at the likes of Vonage, Google,Yahoo and MSN. Meanwhile Google is &lt;a href=&quot;http://today.reuters.com/business/newsArticle.aspx?type=media&amp;storyID=nN13349148&quot;&gt;
seeking &lt;/a&gt; some &lt;a hef=&#8221;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,69271,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_5&quot; &quot;&gt;alternative&lt;/a&gt;
paths to&lt;a href=&quot;http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=171202569&quot;&gt;  the Internet.&lt;/a&gt;Perhaps SBC should head the old adage from John Gilmore &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/accidentalsuperhighway.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;the net treats censorship as a defect and routes around it&#8221;&lt;/a&gt;Or perhaps these companies need to pay the proverbial Internet plumbers; myself, I prefer more competition;&lt;a href=&quot;http://assets.wharton.upenn.edu/~faulhabe/732/InternetKilledPhone.html&quot;&gt;my  phone bill has never been lower! &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46292</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:30:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BPL</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>FTTH</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>SBC</category>
		<category>WIFI</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Blackhat Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43431/Blackhat%2DSearch%2DEngine%2DOptimization</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.platinax.co.uk/blogs/brian/archives/2005/06/dmca_the_new_bl.html"&gt;Blackhat Search Engine Optimization Techniques.&lt;/a&gt; Through the use of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMCA&quot;&gt;DMCA&lt;/a&gt; (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) complaint, you can have competing web sites thrown out of Yahoo&apos;s search index. If you file a DMCA report against a site, Yahoo will quickly remove the &quot;offending&quot; site, leaving no trace of the site in its index.  This has led to a rise in so-called &quot;Blackhat &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization&quot;&gt;SEO&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; wherein one seeks to become the leading search result not by improving one&apos;s own site, but by having competing sites removed through the DMCA.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43431</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blackhat</category>
		<category>dmca</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>nlindstrom</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Search Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36935/Search%2DWars</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4003193.stm"&gt;Search Wars&lt;/a&gt; The BBC reviews five search engines, including Google and the new MSN beta  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36935</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:34:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>websearches</category>
		<dc:creator>Mwongozi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Biz Stratergy MS uses</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27141/Biz%2DStratergy%2DMS%2Duses</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2085668/"&gt;Google: the God that failed?&lt;/a&gt; is the title of the article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/&quot;&gt;MSN Slate&lt;/a&gt;. All of us know Microsoft is working on a new search engine technology. Till date everyone considers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; to be &lt;em&gt;the Guru&lt;/em&gt;. MS obviously doesn&apos;t like that, so what it is doing? Well, the same thing it always does - to survive competition, eliminate it.
The reasons being given by the article are pretty silly and more aimed at &apos;faming down&apos; Google.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27141</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:17:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>engine</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>jayantk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>MSN + Linux = Funny</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26724/MSN%2DLinux%2DFunny</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://search.msn.com/results.asp?RS=CHECKED&amp;amp;FORM=MSNH&amp;amp;v=1&amp;amp;q=linux"&gt;Searching MSN for the phrase &quot;Linux&quot;&lt;/a&gt; yields some pretty amusing (but yes, unsurprising) results.  The first site seems moderately legit - Amazon stuff related to linux.  The second one - MSN has a tech section about Linux?  Not exactly.  It doesn&apos;t really have much linux content at first glance.  The third link is most amusing - see for yourself.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Comparatively, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;q=linux&quot;&gt;google search for &quot;linux&quot;&lt;/a&gt; yields much more useful results.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This makes me wonder:  should ethics be taken into consideration on search engines?  MS has every right to have whatever they want come up when you type in &quot;linux&quot; - but they are willfully contaminating search results, which makes one wonder what &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=word+processor&amp;FORM=SMCRT&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=browser&amp;FORM=SMCRT&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=instant+messaging&amp;FORM=SMCRT&quot;&gt;terms&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft might want to rig the output of, and also, which they might have &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=freebsd&amp;FORM=SMCRT&quot;&gt;overlooked&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26724</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:39:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>twiggy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


