<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Marijuana and SupremeCourt</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Marijuana+SupremeCourt</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Marijuana' and 'SupremeCourt' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:46:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:46:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Limits of Free Speech in Schools</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54305/The%2DLimits%2Dof%2DFree%2DSpeech%2Din%2DSchools</link>
		<description> From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Starr&quot;&gt;guy&lt;/a&gt; who brought you the Whitewater scandal and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200412030011&quot;&gt;impeachment of President Clinton&lt;/a&gt; for lying about oval antics in the Oral Office, a legal push to make the Supreme Court &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/08/27/from-cigars-to-bongs/&quot;&gt;just say no to &quot;Bong Hits 4 Jesus.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Ken Starr&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://wsj.com/public/resources/documents/JuneauSchoolBoardCertPetitionFINAL20060828.pdf&quot;&gt;petition to the Court [PDF]&lt;/a&gt; makes clear that Starr believes this is no laughing matter, but a chance for the Court to make a landmark ruling that will give school adminstrators the power to limit student speech: &quot;This case presents the Court with a much-needed  opportunity to resolve a sharp conflict among federal courts 
(and to eliminate confusion on the part of school boards, 
administrators, teachers, and students) over whether the First 
Amendment permits regulation of student speech when such 
speech is advocating or making light of illegal substances.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54305</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:46:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>bong</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>Clinton</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>FirstAmendment</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<category>school</category>
		<category>Starr</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>Tinker</category>
		<category>Whitewater</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>...to the highest court in the land...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34032/to%2Dthe%2Dhighest%2Dcourt%2Din%2Dthe%2Dland</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;amp;storyID=5532500"&gt;Medical Marijuana&lt;/a&gt; is finally going to be addressed by the Supreme Court.  What this will come down to is federal law vs. state law.  Who has the right to make the final decision?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34032</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:34:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>medicalmarijuana</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>Dantien</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Granny kept it for medicinal purposes only</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28963/Granny%2Dkept%2Dit%2Dfor%2Dmedicinal%2Dpurposes%2Donly</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theolympian.com/home/news/20031015/frontpage/124466.shtml&quot;&gt;SCOTUS supports state medical-weed laws&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a Justice Department effort to punish doctors in Washington and other states for recommending marijuana or even discussing the drug&apos;s benefits with their patients.&quot; (from google news)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28963</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:03:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6568/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/03/26/scotus.affirmative.action.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;one&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/03/26/scotus.death.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;two&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/03/26/medical.marijuana.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;three&lt;/a&gt;.  considering this is the same bunch that put our current resident in the whitehouse, why do i have a bad feeling about this?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6568</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:19:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AffirmativeAction</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>Marijuana</category>
		<category>MedicalMarijuana</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<dc:creator>bliss322</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


