<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Microsoft and Browser</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Microsoft+Browser</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Microsoft' and 'Browser' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Freedom! Horrible, horrible freedom!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82422/Freedom%2DHorrible%2Dhorrible%2Dfreedom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/microsoft/5514948/Microsoft-to-ship-Windows-7-without-Internet-Explorer.html"&gt;Windows 7 will ship without Internet Explorer in Europe&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Microsoft said it made it&#8217;s decision following an anti-trust investigation by the European Union.&quot; &quot;This means that computer manufacturers and users will be free to install Internet Explorer on Windows 7, or not, as they prefer&quot; - Dave Heiner, deputy general counsel for Microsoft.

Related: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/82087/Gang-Bing&quot;&gt;Bing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=64&amp;qpcustom=Bing&amp;sample=41&quot;&gt;(6% market share launch)&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars&quot;&gt;Browser Wars&lt;/a&gt; which are still being &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=0&quot;&gt;won by IE&lt;/a&gt; or pretty much a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp&quot;&gt;dead heat&lt;/a&gt; between IE and FF depending on who you sample.

&lt;small&gt;Apple nod: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/browser-wars-continue-apple-claims-11-million-downloads-for-new-safari-in-3-days/&quot;&gt;Safari&apos;s come from behind upset?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82422</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>7</category>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>chrome</category>
		<category>firefox</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>safari</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<category>windows7</category>
		<dc:creator>sloe</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Internet Explorer - We discovered the web.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42357/Internet%2DExplorer%2DWe%2Ddiscovered%2Dthe%2Dweb</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.getinternetexplorer.com"&gt;Internet Explorer - We discovered the web.&lt;/a&gt; Check out this humorous parody site created for Microsoft&apos;s browser Internet Explorer. Something tells me this won&apos;t be up for too much longer though.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42357</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 14:04:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Browser</category>
		<category>Fun</category>
		<category>Humour</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Parody</category>
		<category>Web</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<dc:creator>sjvilla79</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>in other news, there is no evil microsoft conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34071/in%2Dother%2Dnews%2Dthere%2Dis%2Dno%2Devil%2Dmicrosoft%2Dconspiracy</link>
		<description> What the heck? Now even Slate is saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2103152/&quot;&gt;you should ditch IE and switch to Firefox&lt;/a&gt;. But, as they say in the article, Slate is owned by Microsoft...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34071</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:55:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>firefox</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>reklaw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>All your plugin capability are belong to us</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28018/All%2Dyour%2Dplugin%2Dcapability%2Dare%2Dbelong%2Dto%2Dus</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eolas.com/about_us.html"&gt;Eolas&amp;#0174; Technologies Inc. owns the plugin concept.&lt;/a&gt; Meet &lt;a href=&quot;http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=&apos;5838906&apos;.WKU.&amp;OS=PN/5838906&amp;RS=PN/5838906&quot;&gt;US Patent 5,838,906&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;The patent claims to cover mechanisms for embedding objects within distributed hypermedia documents, where at least some of the object&apos;s data is located external to the document, and there is a control path to the object&apos;s implementation to support user interaction with the object.&quot; Eolas &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eolas.com/zmapress.htm&quot;&gt;sued&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/legal/other/08-11-03EolasStatement.asp&quot;&gt;was awarded $521 million&lt;/a&gt;, Microsoft is appealing, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2003/08/patent&quot;&gt;W3C held&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://macromedia.com/&quot;&gt;Macromedia&lt;/a&gt; hosted) an ad hoc meeting on the recent court decision and launched a &lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-plugins/&quot;&gt;discussion list&lt;/a&gt;. Microsoft plans to promptly make changes to Internet Explorer. If this follows through, what are the negative and positive implications?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28018</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 13:40:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>Eolas</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>IP</category>
		<category>litigation</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>patent</category>
		<category>plugin</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>aaronshaf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>WaSP Calls for MS to Fix Standards Bugs in Discontinued IE</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26663/WaSP%2DCalls%2Dfor%2DMS%2Dto%2DFix%2DStandards%2DBugs%2Din%2DDiscontinued%2DIE</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://webstandards.org/opinion/archive/2003/06/27/"&gt;IE in bug fix mode? Then fix the bugs!&lt;/a&gt; As was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/26386&quot;&gt;mentioned here&lt;/a&gt; before, MS is &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1045_3-1017126.html&quot;&gt;discontinuing&lt;/a&gt; the free version of IE for Mac, and offering it only as part of the MSN service instead. They also &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-1012943.html&quot;&gt;appear&lt;/a&gt; to be doing the same with IE for Windows. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webstandards.org&quot;&gt;Web Standards Project&lt;/a&gt; is demanding that they include standards bugs in the list they are going to fix, because MS has always advertised IE as standards-compliant.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26663</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:03:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Browser</category>
		<category>Bugs</category>
		<category>Fix</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>Mac</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Software</category>
		<category>WebStandards</category>
		<dc:creator>setmajer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12498/</link>
		<description> While the father of Visual Basic tells Microsoft to: &lt;a target=_top href=&quot;http://iwsun4.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/06/15/010615hncooper.xml&quot;&gt;&quot;abandon the browser&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, a multitude of researchers are &lt;a target=_top href=&quot;http://www.techreview.com/magazine/dec01/tristram.asp&quot;&gt;looking into next-generation interfaces&lt;/a&gt; (links via &lt;a target=_top href=&quot;http://www.joelonsoftware.com&quot;&gt;Joel on Software&lt;/a&gt; and Wired respectively).  Is the software industry even close to moving on to a new paradigm?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12498</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2001 06:57:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>gui</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>ui</category>
		<dc:creator>costas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5816/</link>
		<description> The W3C opens a can of whoopass on the browser manufacturers with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206&quot;&gt;this detailed list of bugs they&apos;d like to see remedied&lt;/a&gt;. Will this result in any changes whatsoever, or will Microsoft and Netscape continue to ignore what they &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; be doing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5816</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:36:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>bugs</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>netscape</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>w3c</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4089/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2650506,00.html"&gt;IE 6.0&lt;/a&gt; : The browser for more sophisticated, computer-savvy users?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4089</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2000 13:05:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>ie6</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1658/</link>
		<description> &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.macintouch.com/&quot;&gt;Macintouch&lt;/A&gt; is reporting that Microsoft has disbanded the IE for Mac team and is discontinuing development of IE for Mac.  So much for a 5 year commitment....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1658</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 13:02:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>mac</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>faisal</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1386/</link>
		<description> You know their server isn&apos;t particularly secure; well &lt;A HREF=http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-1717460.html&gt;neither is their browser&lt;/A&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1386</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2000 09:39:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>browsers</category>
		<category>CNet</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>ericost</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


