<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Microsoft and XP</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Microsoft+XP</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Microsoft' and 'XP' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:48:42 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:48:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>We secretly switched their operating system....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73552/We%2Dsecretly%2Dswitched%2Dtheir%2Doperating%2Dsystem</link>
		<description> Microsoft, browbeaten by &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Windows_Vista&quot;&gt;criticism over Windows Vista&lt;/a&gt;, demoed a new operating system code-named Project Mojave to a group of Windows XP users. An overwhelming majority of the XP users liked what they saw.

It was then that Microsoft told them they were &lt;strike&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HGKJHpQkfI&quot;&gt;drinking Folgers Crystals&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strike&gt;, er, using &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2008/07/24/microsoft-lies-to-xp-users-and-they-start-to-love-vista?bub&quot;&gt;Windows Vista&lt;/a&gt;. More on &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9998336-56.html&quot;&gt;Microsoft&apos;s new Vista marketing plan.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73552</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:48:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>crystals</category>
		<category>folgers</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>vista</category>
		<category>xp</category>
		<dc:creator>dw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Limp Bizkit?  Seriously?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53482/Limp%2DBizkit%2DSeriously</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.projectstreamer.com/users/r0t0r00t3r/xp_priv_esc/xp_priv_esc.html "&gt;Compromise any Windows XP machine&lt;/a&gt; (that you have physical access to) with one single line of code.  Even if you&apos;re logged on as guest, this cmd line text will upgrade your account to root level on the fly, after which time you can do anything you wish to the machine, (even reformat the drive &amp;amp; install linux!).  ACHTUNG: Link goes to video that, for inexplicable reasons, has Limp Bizkit for the soundtrack.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53482</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:23:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>whitehat</category>
		<category>xp</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Public computers get security help</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43330/Public%2Dcomputers%2Dget%2Dsecurity%2Dhelp</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum19/2293.htm"&gt;Securing public computers isn&apos;t easy, but a Microsoft kit to do that may also help families share home computers.&lt;/a&gt; If you share a Windows XP Home or Professional computer with other users, particularly, children, or family members, you may find the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/sharedaccess/default.mspx&quot;&gt;Shared Computer Toolkit beta&lt;/a&gt; an interesting idea. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caveat_emptor&quot;&gt;caveat emptor&lt;/a&gt;: this is free &quot;beta&quot; software, has a spooky &quot;validation&quot; process to confirm your copy of Windows is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/genuine/downloads/whyValidate.aspx&quot;&gt;&quot;genuine,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and installation is not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=9516&quot;&gt;for the faint of heart.&lt;/a&gt; Then again, neither is re-installing Windows after a friend/relative/SO inadvertently trashes your computer.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43330</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:40:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>sharing</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>WindowsXP</category>
		<category>WinXP</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>paulsc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17157/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/partner/campaign/Winpro1.asp"&gt;Windows XP Pro for $40!&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft is running a special offer where &apos;partners&apos; can buy Windows XP for &amp;gt;85% off the retail price (free baseball too); all that&apos;s (realistically) needed is a .NET passport account.  Since the MeFites had such fun &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/12512&quot;&gt;buying cameras&lt;/a&gt;, I figured I&apos;d throw this out for discussion; it does seem to involve a wee bit of misrepresentation to take advantage of.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17157</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2002 08:26:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.net</category>
		<category>discount</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>pro</category>
		<category>xp</category>
		<dc:creator>boaz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15380/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/721268.asp"&gt;Microsoft must include Java with XP and IE.&lt;/a&gt; Sun sues Microsoft for including Java, then sues Microsoft for not including Java.  Fascinating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15380</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2002 11:06:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>Java</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Sun</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>milnak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14496/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://homepage.mac.com/Cipher13/.Pictures/vergleich.jpg"&gt;Not even the duckie escapes co-optation&lt;/a&gt; No one disputes the XP GUI is cool. &quot;Good Artists create, Great Artists STEAL, and Real Artists Ship&quot; [link from &lt;a href=&quot;http://nofuncharlie.com&quot;&gt;nofuncharlie&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14496</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 18:36:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>duckies</category>
		<category>GUI</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>plagiarism</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>WinXP</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>otherchaz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13324/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7BAE0CCEB7%2DC65D%2D419E%2DA7DC%2D3F3FA84FBAB8%7D&amp;amp;siteid=mktw"&gt;FBI warns Microsoft XP users&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The FBI is urging computer users to unplug and don&apos;t play when it comes to addressing serious security flaws found in Microsoft&apos;s new Windows XP program.&quot;

&quot;Microsoft admitted this week that there are several serious glitches in the new software. &quot;

Really?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13324</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:40:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>doublepost</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>PlugAndPlay</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>WindowsXP</category>
		<category>WinXP</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>headlemur</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12352/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22789.html"&gt;XP demonstrates &quot;Intelligent design.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; You mean they didn&apos;t evolve it with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.santafe.edu/~shalizi/reviews/holland-on-emergence/&quot;&gt;genetic algorithms&lt;/a&gt;?  Boy, I could swear the past versions were composed of randomly generated code fragments.  (Do read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christianity.com/CC/article/0,,PTID2228|CHID100546|CIID1074576,00.html&quot;&gt;original article&lt;/a&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12352</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:11:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ChuckColson</category>
		<category>creationism</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>fundamentalism</category>
		<category>ID</category>
		<category>IntelligentDesign</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>Watergate</category>
		<category>WindowsXP</category>
		<category>WinXP</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>badstone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12051/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.betanews.com/article.php3?sid=1004438377"&gt;Is Microsoft finally doing things right?&lt;/a&gt; According to this usability study putting Win98 and XP side by side, the answer seems to be affirmative - on favour of XP.

Won&apos;t make me trade my Mac for a Wintel machine though.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12051</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 19:37:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>98</category>
		<category>comparison</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>operatingsystem</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>usabilitystudy</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>betobeto</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9360/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/code/kausfiles/kausfiles.asp?Show=7/29/2001&amp;idMessage=8058&quot;&gt;Slate&apos;s Mickey Kaus&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56188-2001Jul26.html&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; ask the question: For all the claims of illegal monopolies and unfair advantage, is the tech industry counting on Microsoft and Windows XP&apos;s Oct. 25 release to save its bacon?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9360</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2001 08:30:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>MickeyKaus</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>WindowsXP</category>
		<category>WinXP</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9252/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20620.html"&gt;NY Senator wants XP&apos;s release delayed&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Register&lt;/a&gt; writes a somewhat humourous article about it (as usual). Excerpt: &lt;i&gt;&quot;It appears that Microsoft intends to maximize its monopolistic power, using XP as a platform to enter new lines of business while encumbering competitors,&quot; Schumer said, rooting deep into the &apos;I just sussed out Redmond&apos;s business strategy; let&apos;s arrange a press conference&apos; archive.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9252</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:48:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>schumer</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<category>xp</category>
		<dc:creator>DyRE</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9075/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20433.html&quot;&gt;Win XP&apos;s Product Activation as a breeze to hack.&lt;/a&gt;  Provided that RC1 still ships as is and you keep your RAM locked at a fixed number of sticks, it&apos;s simply a matter of keeping a backup of a DBL file.  For all the ballyhoo, it&apos;s amazing that something this obvious slipped under the cracks.  With WPA this sloppy, is this the only half-hearted facet of Windows XP?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9075</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:04:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>activation</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>hacked</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8908/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.licenturion.com/xp/fully-licensed-wpa.txt"&gt;Someone reverse engineered&lt;/a&gt; the Win-XP activation mechanism. It&apos;s not as bad as many people thought. It&apos;s certainly no cause for paranoia.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8908</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2001 23:06:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>activation</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>programming</category>
		<category>reverseengineered</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8459/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20010620/ts/windows_xp_pcs.html"&gt;Microsoft XP Unvevils Blah Blah Blah Oh Who Cares.&lt;/a&gt; The full-press marketing blitz, in the face of slumping PC sales, a sluggish economy, and all common sense, will gloss over the fact that you now need 128 megs of RAM to run Microsoft&apos;s craptastically ill-conceived OS.  Can&apos;t wait, Bill - I&apos;m already gripping the sink!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8459</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>xp</category>
		<dc:creator>solistrato</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8119/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://public.wsj.com/sn/y/SB991862595554629527.html"&gt;Windows XP inserts its own links into any page on the Web.&lt;/a&gt; I especially like the part about their fear that some pages are &quot;underlinked&quot;.  The implications behind this are huge.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8119</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2001 06:31:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>links</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>SmartTags</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>WindowsXP</category>
		<category>WinXP</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>goto11</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6957/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.canoe.ca/MoneyWSJ/wsj2-dow.html"&gt;Microsoft to cripple MP3 capabilities&lt;/a&gt; I don&apos;t think anyone has posted this yet; Microsoft&apos;s new Windows XP operating system is set up so as to cripple MP3 copying, in order to nudge users into using Windows Media Player format for all their music files. Of course, the latter is a proprietary format with copy protection built in. Not only does the built-in software not copy MP3 files at a higher sampling rate than 56kps, but third-party MP3 software apparently does not work properly. --As usual, this will not stop knowledgeable users from finding workarounds, but the goal is to make unprotected copying too difficult for the average Joe.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6957</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:00:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>Rebis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5850/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/guide/newlook.asp"&gt;Windows XP unveiled...&lt;/a&gt; why does it look so &lt;I&gt;bloopy&lt;/I&gt;? And all those bright colors and rounded edges! It&apos;s like Fisher Price OS! (via &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.k10k.net&quot;&gt;K10K&lt;/A&gt;.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5850</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:04:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<category>windowsxp</category>
		<category>xp</category>
		<dc:creator>wiremommy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5689/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com"&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2001/Feb01/02-05NamingPR.asp&quot;&gt;announces the product names&lt;/a&gt; for the next version of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/windows/default.asp&quot;&gt;Windows&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/office/&quot;&gt;Office&lt;/a&gt;.  They&apos;ll be called &quot;Windows XP&quot; and &quot;Office XP&quot;, respectively.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5689</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 10:22:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>naming</category>
		<category>office</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<category>xp</category>
		<dc:creator>milnak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


