MetaFilter posts tagged with Microsoft and antitrust

Freedom! Horrible, horrible freedom!

sloe — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:55 -0800

Windows 7 will ship without Internet Explorer in Europe "Microsoft said it made it’s decision following an anti-trust investigation by the European Union." "This means that computer manufacturers and users will be free to install Internet Explorer on Windows 7, or not, as they prefer" - Dave Heiner, deputy general counsel for Microsoft. Related: Bing (6% market share launch) and the Browser Wars which are still being won by IE or pretty much a dead heat between IE and FF depending on who you sample. Apple nod: Safari's come from behind upset?

but mommy SAID i could!!!!!

quonsar — Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:10:03 -0800

Microsoft Corp. accused the European Union on Tuesday of going too far in seeking a record fine of about $615 million against the software giant for alleged antitrust abuses, saying it was being penalized for behavior permitted in the United States.

Microsoft like Tanya Harding

Ron — Fri, 06 Dec 2002 07:34:28 -0800

Microsoft akin to Tanya Harding. So says U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz. The crowbar wielding, knee popping company is also similar to baseball.

gsteff — Thu, 23 May 2002 21:52:41 -0800

Microsoft has designed a Windows XP patch that will trick computers into behaving as though IE, Outlook Express, and Messenger aren't there, though not removing them, per the requirements of its antitrust settlement. They demonstrated a working version to the AP yesterday. Oh yeah, and they're releasing it as a 40 megabyte download. In August. And it's other primary function will be to potentially sabotage the operating system. Good ol' Microsoft.

aaronshaf — Mon, 04 Mar 2002 12:42:20 -0800

Microsoft plans "doomsday defense". Microsoft Corp. plans to argue in court hearings next week that if antitrust sanctions sought by state prosecutors are granted, the company would be forced to pull its latest Windows computer operating systems off the market and be unable to develop new systems.

plemeljr — Wed, 23 Jan 2002 05:23:52 -0800

Fed Up? Happy? Excited? Step right up and add your comments to the Microsoft Antitrust Trial. Due to the Tunney Act, all of us have the right to comment on the proceedings. The comment period closes Monday morning (the 28th) so if you have an opinion, and we know everyone here does, email/snail mail/call the DOJ.

hitsman — Tue, 22 Jan 2002 19:05:42 -0800

AOL's Netscape sues Microsoft for damage done to its Netscape Internet browser by violations of antitrust law found in a separate government case against the software giant. "I don't see this case as primarily about money. I see it as primarily about injunctive relief,'' said Steve Salop, a Georgetown University law professor.

SilentSalamander — Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:02:29 -0800

Justice Rejects Microsoft Penalty (yahoo news) The government considered but rejected penalties against Microsoft Corp. in its antitrust case that would have required the company to reveal the secret blueprints to its flagship Windows software and to distribute products from its fiercest rivals, court records show. The Justice Department also set up an e-mail address where consumers and companies may send their comments about the antitrust settlement. That address is: microsoft.atr@usdoj.gov Whether or not you're pro-Microsoft, anti-Microsoft, or on the fence... I encourage everyone to send their thoughts along.

riffola — Fri, 02 Nov 2001 10:01:08 -0800

Microsoft signs consent decree with the US government to settle antitrust case. Settlement is fair, reasonable and good for consumers; It is time now to focus on challenges ahead for the industry and Economy, says Gates.

misterioso — Tue, 09 Oct 2001 13:04:20 -0800

U.S. Supreme Court denies Microsoft's appeal. Is anyone else surprised how long these U.S. v. Microsoft trials have gone on? Is there an end in sight? The longer the courts (and both parties) drag this on, the more moot this case will become.

Steven Den Beste — Thu, 06 Sep 2001 07:57:17 -0800

Microsoft wins!!!

lawtalkinguy — Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:27:04 -0800

"[Gigantic Media Company]'s actions are unprecedented and completely anti-consumer," said [Other Gigantic Media Company] spokesman Vivek Varma. "[Gigantic Media Company] is paying computer makers to eliminate consumer choice, forcing people to select the most expensive service in the industry." Uh, pot, kettle left a message for you: you're black.

dwivian — Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:02:17 -0800

Microsoft to stay one company? Appeals say Microsoft to stay a behemoth. I think Clippy is here to stay.

Sapphireblue — Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:11:03 -0800

Oh, leave the poor guy alone already. Not the much-harrassed ex-president Clinton this time, but rather Bill Gates and co., who are in the Justice Department's crosshairs yet again, due to Microsoft's investments in Corel.

jay — Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:57:30 -0800

Gates worried about AOL's dominance of IM market. So what does he do, he gets on the phone to the FCC. That's right, Bill wants the governement to intervene to prevent a company from dominating a market. Umm... Bill what the Freedom to innovate which you are so worried about.

daveadams — Wed, 15 Nov 2000 13:30:42 -0800

After Microsoft and Napster, Boies tackles Bush. Did anyone catch this? I noticed this morning on NBC that David Boies, who has represented IBM (versus the DOJ), the Yankees, the DOJ (versus Microsoft), and Napster, is now representing Al Gore. Wacky stuff.

Steven Den Beste — Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:01:11 -0800

Some people don't know when to keep their mouths shut. You'd think a judge of such long experience would know better. (Also this.)

Steven Den Beste — Wed, 07 Jun 2000 22:13:24 -0800

Will MSFT go up or down tomorrow on the market? Whatcha all think?

daveadams — Wed, 07 Jun 2000 13:49:58 -0800

Judge rules Microsoft must split up
Judge Jackson handed down the verdict today that Microsoft should be broken into two companies: one for Windows OSes, the other for all other applications and services. Many restrictions on Microsoft's behavior would also be put in place, pretty much just ensuring they couldn't lock anyone into exclusive contracts or force bundling deals on anyone.

Mark — Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:20:37 -0800

The judged ruled against Microsoft today, saying that the company did in fact violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, but we already knew that.

mathowie — Sat, 06 Nov 1999 12:27:40 -0800

You've no doubt seen the original DOJ document issued yesterday on the MS trial findings. Brent Verner has posted a nicely formatted copy that makes for easier reading.

jjg — Sat, 17 Jul 1999 17:58:13 -0800

I wonder if Microsoft's acquittal in the Bristol case is a bad omen for the DOJ.