<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Militarism</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Militarism</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Militarism' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:40:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:40:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The American Military Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74122/The%2DAmerican%2DMilitary%2DCrisis</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174964/andrew_bacevich_the_american_military_crisis"&gt;Illusions of Victory: How the United States Did Not Reinvent War&#8230; But Thought It Did.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174965/andrew_bacevich_the_lessons_of_endless_war&quot;&gt;Is Perpetual War Our Future? Learning the Wrong Lessons from the Bush Era.&lt;/a&gt; Two excerpts from &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0805088156/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, the new book by &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Bacevich&quot;&gt;Andrew Bacevich&lt;/a&gt; (previously: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/39801/On-The-New-American-Militarism-How-Americans-Are-Seduced-By-War&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/41466/On-The-New-American-Militarism-How-Americans-Are-Seduced-By-War-20&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/61204/Semiwar&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/61571/I-Lost-My-Son-to-a-War-I-Oppose&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74122</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:40:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>AndrewBacevich</category>
		<category>Exceptionalism</category>
		<category>Militarism</category>
		<category>Military</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq Movie Posters</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62779/Iraq%2DMovie%2DPosters</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/picture_gallery/picture_gallery/0,,70141-1274249-1,00.html"&gt;Iraq&apos;s Horror Movie Posters.&lt;/a&gt; According to Sky News, insurgent forces are taking up &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worth1000.com/&quot;&gt;Worth1000&lt;/a&gt; style criticism to hold up a mirror to citizens of the US and their Military-Entertainment complex.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62779</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:47:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anti-american</category>
		<category>complex</category>
		<category>insurgency</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>militarism</category>
		<category>military-entertainment</category>
		<category>movie</category>
		<category>parody</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poster</category>
		<category>situationist</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Ambrosia Voyeur</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Semiwar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61204/Semiwar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070423/bacevich"&gt;The Semiwarriors: By creating an atmosphere of perpetual crisis, Presidents have expanded their powers and hidden their actions from the public eye.&lt;/a&gt; A recent essay by retired Army lieutenant Colonel and current Boston University professor of international relations &lt;a href=http://www.bu.edu/ir/faculty/bacevich.html&gt;Andrew J. Bacevich&lt;/a&gt;, on &quot;semiwar,&quot; a term coined after World War II &quot;to promote permanent quasi mobilization as the essential response to permanent global crisis.&quot; Bacevich is the author of  &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=2334&gt;The New American Militarism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=2337&gt;How Americans Are Seduced by War&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; (previously discussed &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/39801/On-The-New-American-Militarism-How-Americans-Are-Seduced-By-War&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/41466/On-The-New-American-Militarism-How-Americans-Are-Seduced-By-War-20&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  Tragically, &lt;a href=http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/002129.php&gt;Bacevich&apos;s own son&lt;/a&gt;, an Army First Lieutenant, &lt;a href=http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/05/15/son_of_professor_opposed_to_war_is_killed_in_iraq/&gt;was killed on patrol in Iraq two days ago by an IED&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61204</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 02:32:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Militarism</category>
		<category>SemiWar</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>IJN Battleship YAMATO</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58133/IJN%2DBattleship%2DYAMATO</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=l-FaVVtjItg"&gt;IJN Battleship YAMATO&lt;/a&gt; (from 2005 Toei &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0451845/&quot;&gt;film&lt;/a&gt;).  NHK IJN feature &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_XiIg7A_-A&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdaXmcDarJE&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lpvu438Nz1w&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpLOosWvahU&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoIT2NeA3KU&quot;&gt;5&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOzk0AXu4PM&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRmUxH0bWO0&quot;&gt;Glorious Imperial Japanese Navy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51rIaskPAfM&quot;&gt;Modern mashup&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qn_Djx7Naek&quot;&gt;JSDF fanvid pt 1&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v3gUuDMFMg&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;. JMSDF Fleet Review &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEr_GJ72MFA&quot;&gt;rehearsal&lt;/a&gt;. JSDF Marching Festival 2006: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2cJ3sKZ_lc&quot;&gt;Opening Ceremony&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRKBGVquFFs&quot;&gt;USAJ Band&lt;/a&gt; (sad),  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LIi3pIjQgw&quot;&gt;7th Fleet Band&lt;/a&gt; (gack), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASpRusi7ytU&quot;&gt;III MEF Band&lt;/a&gt; (nice!), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufKQ3UkPE7Q&quot;&gt;J NDA Honor Guard&lt;/a&gt;. PLA &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXaxzpf987c&quot;&gt;schools everyone&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58133</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:22:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>band</category>
		<category>ijn</category>
		<category>jmsdf</category>
		<category>marching</category>
		<category>militarism</category>
		<category>pla</category>
		<category>yamato</category>
		<dc:creator>Heywood Mogroot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Risk-transfer militarism, small massacres and the historic legitimacy of war</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42983/Risktransfer%2Dmilitarism%2Dsmall%2Dmassacres%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dhistoric%2Dlegitimacy%2Dof%2Dwar</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;In this paper, I will first consider the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as the latest examples of the new Western way of war, and analyse their casualties alongside those of previous campaigns in the Gulf and Kosovo. I shall identify the new type as &#8220;risk-transfer war,&#8221; a central feature of which is a &#8220;militarism of small massacres.&#8221; I shall argue that this new type thus offers only a partial answer to the problems, for the legitimacy of warfare, caused by the systematic targeting of civilians in earlier &#8220;degenerate war.&#8221; Despite a closer approximation to &#8220;just war&#8221; criteria, the application of which the new mode I shall discuss, inequalities of risk between Western military personnel and civilians in the zone of war revive the question of legitimacy in a new form. The paper then suggests that in our concern for relatively small numbers of civilian casualties, we may be applying to war standards from which it has historically been exempt. In this context, I shall conclude by proposing that the contradictions of the new Western way of war reinforce a &apos;historical pacifist&apos;  position towards the general legitimacy of warfare.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://presentdanger.irc-online.org/papers/0406militarism_body.html&quot; title=&quot;However Walzer also provided the fly in the ointment when he pointed out that &apos;Simply not to intend the death of civilians is too easy... What we look for in such cases is some sign of a positive commitment to save civilian lives. Civilians have a right to something more. and if saving civilian lives means risking soldiers&#8217; lives, that risk must be accepted.&apos; In risk-transfer war, this is precisely what is avoided at all costs. bombing and long-range artillery bombardments are undertaken in the firm knowledge that it will increase the risk to civilians compared to other possible means, military as well as non-military. High-altitude and long-range destruction is inherently indiscriminate.&quot;&gt;Risk-transfer Militarism and the Legitimacy of War after Iraq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justwartheory.com&quot; title=&quot;Welcome! JustWarTheory.com is a free, non-profit, annotated aid to research and instruction in philosophical studies of warfare. It is owned and maintained by Mark Rigstad, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Oakland University. &quot;&gt;JustWarTheory.com&lt;/a&gt;, which has its own &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justwartheory.com/editorial.html&quot; title=&quot;JWT BLOG (News, Uncatalogued Links, &amp; Editorial Reflections)&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42983</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:45:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>militarism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>On The New American Militarism - How Americans Are Seduced By War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39801/On%2DThe%2DNew%2DAmerican%2DMilitarism%2DHow%2DAmericans%2DAre%2DSeduced%2DBy%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;The argument I make in my book is that what I describe as the new American militarism arises as an unintended consequence of the reaction to the Vietnam War and more broadly, to the sixties... If some people think that the sixties constituted a revolution, that revolution produced a counterrevolution, launched by a variety of groups that had one thing in common: they saw revival of American military power, institutions, and values as the antidote to everything that in their minds had gone wrong. None of these groups &#8212; the neoconservatives, large numbers of Protestant evangelicals, politicians like Ronald Reagan, the so-called defense intellectuals, and the officer corps &#8212; set out saying, &#8220;Militarism is a good idea.&#8221; But I argue that this is what we&#8217;ve ended up with: a sense of what military power can do, a sort of deference to the military, and an attribution of virtue to the men and women who serve in uniform. Together this constitutes such a pernicious and distorted attitude toward military affairs that it qualifies as militarism. &lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bu.edu/alumni/bostonia/2004/winter/war/&quot; title=&quot;How do you see us getting out of this World War IV mess? &apos;I think the beginning of wisdom is to rethink our attitudes and expectations with regard to military power and to come to something that&#8217;s more realistic and balanced &#8212; and I&#8217;d emphasize, more in harmony with our democracy. This outsourcing to a professional elite of our responsibility as citizens to defend the country, this penchant for interventionism in our world, this expectation that somehow the building up of ever-greater military power offers some sort of antidote to the problems that we face &#8212; these are wrong. We can&#8217;t come to the right answer until we first recognize that the accepted answer is defective &#8212; fundamentally defective.&apos;&quot;&gt;An interview with Andrew Bacevich&lt;/a&gt;, international relations professor and former Army colonel, and author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryOther/MilitaryHistory/~~/cHI9MTAmcGY9MCZzcz1wdWJkYXRlLmFzYyZzZj1jb21pbmdzb29uJnNkPWFzYyZ2aWV3PXVzYSZjaT0wMTk1MTczMzg0&quot; title=&quot;In this provocative new book, Andrew Bacevich warns of a dangerous dual obsession that has taken hold of Americans, conservatives and liberals alike. It is a marriage of militarism and utopian ideology--of unprecedented military might wed to a blind faith in the universality of American values. This perilous union, Bacevich argues, commits Americans to a futile enterprise, turning the US into a crusader state with a self-proclaimed mission of driving history to its final destination: the world-wide embrace of the American way of life. This mindset invites endless war and the ever-deepening militarization of US policy. It promises not to perfect but to pervert American ideals and to accelerate the hollowing out of American democracy. As it alienates others, it will leave the United States increasingly isolated. It will end in bankruptcy, moral as well as economic, and in abject failure.&quot;&gt;The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War&lt;/a&gt;--and here is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://antiwar.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=The+New+American+Militarism+-+by+Paul+Craig+Roberts&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=12911826&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fantiwar.com%2Froberts%2F%3Farticleid%3D4445&amp;partnerID=16&quot; title=&quot;The new American militarism has abandoned the Founding Fathers, deserted the Constitution, and unrestrained the executive. War is a first resort. Militarism is inconsistent with globalism and with American ideals. It will end in abject failure. The world is a vast place. The U.S. has demonstrated that it cannot impose its will on a tiny part known as Iraq. American realism may yet reassert itself, dispel the fog of delusion, cleanse the body politic of the Jacobin spirit, and lead the world by good example. But this happy outcome will require regime change in the U.S.&quot;&gt;review&lt;/a&gt;. Recently by Bacevich: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/iraq/commentary/la-oe-bacevich20feb20,1,6632062,print.story?coll=la-iraq-commentary&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true&quot; title=&quot;In the early days of the insurgency, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez vowed to use &apos;whatever combat power is necessary to win,&apos; displaying all the pugnacity of a George Patton or Stormin&apos; Norman Schwarzkopf... Senior commanders no longer make such bold promises. Nor do senior civilian officials in Washington. Indeed, today the Bush administration&apos;s aim is not to win but to relieve itself of responsibility for waging a war that it began but cannot finish. Debate in national security circles focuses not on deploying war-winning technologies or fielding innovative tactics that might turn the tide, but on how we can extricate ourselves before our overstretched forces suffer irreparable damage... The decisive victory promised by the war&apos;s advocates back in March 2003 &#8212; remember all the talk of &apos;shock and awe&apos;? &#8212; has now slipped beyond our grasp.&quot;&gt;We Aren&apos;t Fighting to Win Anymore - U.S. troops in Iraq are only trying to buy time&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39801</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>american</category>
		<category>andrewbacevich</category>
		<category>army</category>
		<category>bacevich</category>
		<category>militarism</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>vietnam</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


