<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Mind and consciousness</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Mind+consciousness</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Mind' and 'consciousness' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:15:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:15:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Feeling &apos;Selfy&apos; ? Regarding &apos;The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind, and the Myth of the Self&apos; by Thomas Metzinger</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85824/Feeling%2DSelfy%2DRegarding%2DThe%2DEgo%2DTunnel%2DThe%2DScience%2Dof%2Dthe%2DMind%2Dand%2Dthe%2DMyth%2Dof%2Dthe%2DSelf%2Dby%2DThomas%2DMetzinger</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/rn/allinthemind/&quot; title=&quot;Natasha Mitchell is an Australian science/health journalist, radio host and producer. She presents a weekly program called All in the Mind. &quot;&gt;Natasha Mitchell&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: So it&apos;s not a little man or woman inside our heads...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philosophie.uni-mainz.de/metzinger/&quot; title=&quot;Professor of Philosophy, Director of the Theoretical Philosophy Group at the Department of Philosophy of the Johannes Gutenberg-Universit&amp;#0228;t Mainz. Head of Neurophilosophy Section at IFSN (Interdisziplin&amp;#0228;ren Forschungsschwerpunkts Neurowissenschaften). Coordinator Neuroethics Section. Adjunct Fellow, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies&quot;&gt;Thomas Metzinger&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: ...that looks at pictures. But the experience of looking, of being directed to one&apos;s own feelings or to one&apos;s sensory perceptions of the outside world, this is itself an image. There is nobody looking at the image, it&apos;s like the camera is part of the picture or the viewing is itself a part of the process of viewing. This is how a first-person perspective emerges in our own case, the question is, okay, if it&apos;s not a thing, if it&apos;s not something in the brain, what kind of a process is it? &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;And I think it&apos;s a process, as philosophers say, of representing, that is of making an image, and that process is not there all the time. You know you have a conscious self in dreams, you have one in your waking life. During anaesthesia or during dreamless sleep there is no such thing as this process of self-ing, if I may call it like that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/rn/allinthemind/stories/2009/2705963.htm#transcript&quot; title=&quot;&apos;Conscious experience is like a tunnel; extremely selective, what we see, hear, feel, smell is only a small fraction of what exists out there. The ongoing process of conscious experience is not so much an image of reality as a tunnel through reality...The brain constantly creates the experience that I am present in the world outside my brain...ultimately our Ego is an activation pattern in your central nervous system&apos; -Thomas Metzinger, The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind, and the Myth of the Self&quot;&gt;You are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a self! Bodies, brains and the nature of consciousness&lt;/a&gt; 

A review of Metzinger&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://metapsychology.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=book&amp;id=5170&amp;cn=396&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt;The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind, and the Myth of the Self&lt;/a&gt;

From the review:&lt;blockquote&gt;Metzinger believes strongly that it is possible to solve the philosophical puzzle of consciousness only if we come to understand that to the best of our current knowledge there is no thing, no indivisible entity that is us, neither in the brain nor in some metaphysical realm beyond this world. Thus, highlighting a series of groundbreaking experiments in neuroscience, virtual reality and robotics, and his own pioneering research into the phenomenon of the &quot;out-of-body&quot; experience, Metzinger reveals how our brains construct our reality. According to him, our deepest sense of self is completely dependent on our brain functioning. 

The internal image of the person-as-a-whole is the phenomenal Ego, the &quot;I&quot; or &quot;self&quot; as it appears in conscious experience. The phenomenal Ego is not some mysterious thing or little man inside the head but the content of an inner image, namely, the conscious self-model. Metzinger claims that by placing the self-model within the world-model, a center, which we experience as ourselves, the Ego, is created. But, as Metzinger himself admits, one has to dissolve the problem of the subjectivity of consciousness if one wants to have the big picture. The ego tunnel is a consciousness tunnel that has evolved the additional property of creating a robust first person perspective, a subjective view of the world. It is a consciousness tunnel plus an apparent self. But, this is the challenge Metzinger takes in order to understand how a genuine sense of selfhood appears. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.abc.net.au/allinthemind/2009/10/you-are-not-a-self-thomas-metzinger.html&quot; title=&quot;His new book is The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind, and the Myth of the Self, and we&apos;re dissecting the nature of feeling &apos;Selfy&apos; on the show. Selfy? Tune in for more.&quot;&gt;All In the Mind blog post&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.perseusbooksgroup.com/basic/book_detail.jsp?isbn=0465045677&quot; title=&quot;We&#8217;re used to thinking about the self as an independent entity, something that we either have or are. In The Ego Tunnel, philosopher Thomas Metzinger claims otherwise: No such thing as a self exists. The conscious self is the content of a model created by our brain--an internal image, but one we cannot experience as an image. Everything we experience is &apos;a virtual self in a virtual reality.&apos; But if the self is not &apos;real,&apos; why and how did it evolve? How does the brain construct it? Do we still have souls, free will, personal autonomy, or moral accountability ?&quot;&gt;The Ego Tunnel&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20127001.600-review-the-ego-tunnel-by-thomas-metzinger.html&quot; title=&quot;WHAT is the self? One answer is that it is the diamond in the rough that is you, the unique, immutable and indestructible jewel that makes each person who they are, the being amidst the becoming, the unfluxable within the flux. Kant called it the Transcendental Ego, which stands behind experience as the condition of its possibility. An alternative view endorsed by Buddha, Heraclitus, John Locke, David Hume and William James is that the self does not exist. &quot;&gt;New Scientist review preview&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot; title=&quot;Neuroscience and psychology tricks to find out what&apos;s going on inside your brain. &quot;&gt;Mindhacks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85824</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:15:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>Dream</category>
		<category>Ego</category>
		<category>Lucid</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Out-of-Body</category>
		<category>Self</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Afterlife and the Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75721/Afterlife%2Dand%2Dthe%2DMind</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=never-say-die&amp;ec=su_neversaydie&quot;&gt;Never Say Die: Why We Can&apos;t Imagine Death&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;Why do we wonder where our mind goes when the body is dead? Shouldn&#8217;t it be obvious that the mind is dead, too?&lt;/i&gt; Examining self-consciousness and mortality.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75721</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afterlife</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>dying</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>mortality</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wilder Penfield</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74465/Wilder%2DPenfield</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2008/08/wilder_penfield_neural_cartographer.php"&gt;Wilder Penfield, Neural Cartographer.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74465</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:15:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>homunculus</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>MotorHomunculus</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>Sensation</category>
		<category>sensoryhomunculus</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Limits of fMRI</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74238/The%2DLimits%2Dof%2DfMRI</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/08/17/picturing_our_thoughts/?page=full"&gt;Picturing our thoughts.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;We&apos;re looking for too much in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2008/06/the_fmri_smackdown_c.html&quot;&gt;brain scans&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74238</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:20:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>BrainScan</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>fMRI</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>To Read or Not to Read</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65863/To%2DRead%2Dor%2DNot%2Dto%2DRead</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://consc.net/mindpapers"&gt;MindPapers&lt;/a&gt; - David Chalmers organizes, streamlines and expands his &lt;a href=&quot;http://consc.net/online/&quot;&gt;collection of papers&lt;/a&gt; related to mind and neuroscience.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65863</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:11:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>resource</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Philosophy and Neuroscience</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65306/Philosophy%2Dand%2DNeuroscience</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.petemandik.com/philosophy/papers/brookmandik.pdf"&gt;The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement&lt;/a&gt; (PDF).  A paper by &lt;a href=&quot;http://http-server.carleton.ca/~abrook/&quot;&gt;Andrew Brook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petemandik.com/&quot;&gt;Pete Mandik&lt;/a&gt; on the relationship between neuroscience and philosophy.  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot;&gt;MindHacks&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;ABSTRACT: A movement dedicated to applying neuroscience to traditional philosophical problems and using philosophical methods to illuminate issues in neuroscience began about twenty-five years ago. Results in neuroscience have affected how we see traditional areas of philosophical concern such as perception, belief-formation, and consciousness. There is an interesting interaction between some of the distinctive features of neuroscience and important general issues in the philosophy of science. And recent neuroscience has thrown up a few conceptual issues that philosophers are perhaps best trained to deal with. After sketching the history of the movement, we explore the relationships between neuroscience and philosophy and introduce some of the specific issues that have arisen.&lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65306</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:05:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I&apos;m blue, da boo dee, da boo die...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48688/Im%2Dblue%2Dda%2Dboo%2Ddee%2Dda%2Dboo%2Ddie</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bluebrainproject.epfl.ch/"&gt;Blue Gene bears Blue Brain beats Deep Blue.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;c2coff=1&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;q=author%3A%22H+Markram%22&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_yhi=&amp;btnG=Search&quot;&gt;Dr. Henry Markram&lt;/a&gt; answers questions in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bluebrainproject.epfl.ch/FAQs.htm&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/pr.nsf/pages/rsc.bluegene_cognitive.html&quot;&gt;Neurons  are beautiful&lt;/a&gt;.  Blue Gene/L is now the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.top500.org/lists/2005/11/basic&quot;&gt;fastest supercomputer in the world&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.research.ibm.com/tts/&quot;&gt;IBM Research&lt;/a&gt; rocks. Deep Blue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/home/html/b.shtml&quot;&gt;beat Kasparov&lt;/a&gt; almost a decade ago. &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4071192.stm&quot;&gt;F&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4054975&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/308/5729/1738c?maxtoshow=&amp;HITS=10&amp;hits=10&amp;RESULTFORMAT=&amp;titleabstract=%22Blue+Brain%22&amp;searchid=1119808194758_2018&amp;stored_search=&amp;FIRSTINDEX=0&amp;fdate=10/1/1995&amp;tdate=6/30/2005&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050606/full/435720a.html&quot;&gt;l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/technology/sciences/2005/06/06/cx_mh_0606ibm.html&quot;&gt;i&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/hardwaretopics/hardware/story/0,10801,102288,00.html&quot;&gt;n&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0720_050720_bluebrain.html&quot;&gt;g&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theconnection.org/shows/2005/06/20050613_b_main.asp&quot;&gt;B&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/006973.php&quot;&gt;l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neuroart2006.com/&quot;&gt;u&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neuron.yale.edu/neuron/&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://brain.cse.unr.edu/ncsDocs/&quot;&gt;?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48688</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:51:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>ibm</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>reflection</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The concept of the Transhuman: human, the self, consciousness and their effects on the law</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47580/The%2Dconcept%2Dof%2Dthe%2DTranshuman%2Dhuman%2Dthe%2Dself%2Dconsciousness%2Dand%2Dtheir%2Deffects%2Don%2Dthe%2Dlaw</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.transhumanlaw.org/index.html"&gt;The first Transhuman Conference On the Law of Transhuman Persons:&lt;/a&gt; Whether or not you believe humans are set to evolve into gods, or AI is destined to achieve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.transhumanist.com/volume1/moravec.htm&quot;&gt;self-awareness&lt;/a&gt; the idea of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhuman&quot;&gt;Transhuman&lt;/a&gt; is a thought provoking concept. Philosophers have debated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/texts.html&quot;&gt;the nature of the self&lt;/a&gt;, of the human for millennia. Is it time to start drafting new laws to govern &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; possible sentient beings on this planet? or is it all just a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/jstrout/uploading/MUHomePage.html&quot;&gt;science&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=505&quot;&gt;fiction&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.granta.com/books/chapters/979&quot;&gt;a comfortable  humanist illusion&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47580</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:43:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>awareness</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>existence</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>humanism</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>reference</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>scifi sf</category>
		<category>self</category>
		<category>sf</category>
		<category>singularity</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>transhuman</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This so called reality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46889/This%2Dso%2Dcalled%2Dreality</link>
		<description> If the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailycal.org/article.php?id=20361&quot;&gt;universe is a hologram&lt;/a&gt; and the healthy human brain a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4360572.stm&quot;&gt;valve of consciousness&lt;/a&gt; then where&apos;d &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/node/8288&quot;&gt;this mental infinity&lt;/a&gt; come from? &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.com/wiki/simulacrum&quot;&gt;Are we simply living the simulacrum&lt;/a&gt;? Or does &lt;a href=&quot;http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/pimatrix.html&quot;&gt;Pi protect us all, forever, infinitely?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46889</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:38:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>infinity</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>perception</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>pi</category>
		<category>reality</category>
		<category>schizophrenia</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>simulacrum</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ramachandran for brain enthusiasts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42494/Ramachandran%2Dfor%2Dbrain%2Denthusiasts</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mindbluff.com/phantom.htm"&gt;Phantom limb illusions&lt;/a&gt; Dr. Ramachandran is an investigator of the senses. His explorations on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0003014B-9D06-1E8F-8EA5809EC5880000&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;catID=2&quot;&gt;synesthesia&lt;/a&gt;, phantom limbs, and human consciousness are revealing excursions into sensory awareness. And his reader-friendly books, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0131486861/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;A Brief Tour of Human Consciousness&lt;/a&gt; and  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0688172172/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Phantoms in the Brain&lt;/a&gt; (both from Amazon) are a pleasure to read. His greatest gifts appear to be a childlike simplicity, coupled with straightforward empiricism. His writing is easy-to-understand, often sparked with unpredictable humor. Recommended for all mind &amp;amp; brain enthusiasts who may not have heard of him yet.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42494</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:57:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>limbs</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>phantom</category>
		<category>synesthesia</category>
		<dc:creator>ember</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Online papers on consciousness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40125/Online%2Dpapers%2Don%2Dconsciousness</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://consc.net/online.html"&gt;Online papers on consciousness&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lccs.edu/~jsennett/iceman.htm&quot;&gt;androids&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scar.utoronto.ca/~seager/zombie.html&quot;&gt;zombies&lt;/a&gt;, compiled by &lt;a href=&quot;http://fragments.consc.net/&quot;&gt;David Chalmers&lt;/a&gt;.  Need a primer before you jump into the heavy stuff?  See his &lt;a href=&quot;http://consc.net/guide.html&quot;&gt;Guide to the Philosophy of Mind&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidchess.com/words/log.html&quot;&gt;The Curvature of the Earth is Overwhelmed by Local Noise&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40125</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:28:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bibliography</category>
		<category>chalmers</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>davidchalmers</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<dc:creator>DevilsAdvocate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11074/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20011002/aponline210347_000.htm"&gt;John C. Lilly dies.  &lt;/a&gt; Inventor of the isolation tank and pioneer of dolphin/human communications and all around cool counterculture guy.  He will be missed. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnclilly.com/&quot;&gt;[Lilly homepage]&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11074</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 14:33:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>dolphins</category>
		<category>JohnCLilly</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>obit</category>
		<category>obituary</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8690/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010629/sc/life_consciousness_dc_1.html"&gt;Scientist Says Mind Continues After Brain Dies.&lt;/a&gt; This articles raises an interesting new theory on how the mind works, suggesting that perhaps a person&apos;s consciousness exists independent of the brain, with the brain acting as a sort of receiver of thoughts. Interesting and scary.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8690</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:56:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>NDE</category>
		<category>NearDeathExperience</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<dc:creator>mcsweetie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


